Adaptation of G. Shmidt’s scale for job apathy

 
PIIS020595920007904-0-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920007904-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Research fellow, International laboratory of positive psychology of personality and motivation
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Moscow, Myasnickaya str., b., 20
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 41 Issue 2
Pages115-126
Abstract

The results of adaptation of Russian-language version of G. Shmidt’s scale for professional apathy are presented. On the sample of 275 employees of “Courier Service Express” organization it has been shown that adapted scale makes it possible to measure apathic thoughts (lack of interest and emotional loyalty for work in organization) and apathic actions (lack of tendency in realization of actions necessary for successful decision of work tasks). High reliability of Russian-language version of scale has been demonstrated: Cronbach's alpha for apathic thoughts scale is 0.86 and 0.73 – for apathic actions scale. Validity of the adapted scale has been confirmed by direct correlation of professional apathy with professional burnout and experiencing of nothingness in professional activity and by reverse one with dedication and satisfaction with job and experiencing of gratification and meaning in professional activity. It has been demonstrated that employees’ apathic thoughts do not depend on socio-demographic characteristics while apathic actions depend on age, family status and dependence of family financial state from an employee.

KeywordsProfessional apathy, professional burnout, experiencing in professional activity, dedication to job, satisfaction with job
Received13.12.2019
Publication date04.03.2020
Number of characters23062
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1884

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vodop'janova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Sindrom vygoranija: diagnostika i profilaktika. St.-Petersburg: Piter, 2008. (in Russian)

2. Zolotareva A.A. Razrabotka i aprobacija novoj psihologicheskoj shkaly apatii // Materialy V Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Aktual'nye voprosy psihologii zdorov'ja i psihosomaticheskoj discipliny” (g. Mahachkala, 14 nojabrja 2017 g.). Mahachkala: Dagestanskij gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet, 2017. P. 86–91. (in Russian)

3. Ivanova T.Ju., Rasskazova E.I., Osin E.N. Struktura i diagnostika udovletvorennosti trudom: razrabotka i aprobacija metodik // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2012. V. 2. № 3. P. 2–15. (in Russian)

4. Kutuzova D.A. Organizacija dejatel'nosti i stil' samoreguljacii kak faktory professional'nogo vygoranija pedagoga-psihologa: dis… kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2006. (in Russian)

5. Lovakov A.V. Psihometricheskij analiz russkojazychnoj versii Gollandskoj shkaly trudovoj zavisimosti (DUWAS) // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2016. V. 6. № 3. P. 22–37. (in Russian)

6. Osin E.N., Leont'ev D.A. Diagnostika perezhivanij v professional'noj dejatel'nosti: validizacija metodiki // Organizacionnaja psihologija. 2017. V. 7. № 2. P. 30–51. (in Russian)

7. Chiksentmihaji M. Potok: psihologija optimal'nogo perezhivanija. Moscow: Smysl; Al'pina Non-fikshn, 2011. 464 p. (in Russian)

8. Blau G., Boal K. Conceptualizing how job involvement and organizational commitment affect turnover and absenteeism // Academy of Management Review. 1987. V. 15. № 1. P. 115–127.

9. Griffeth R.W., Gaertner S., Sager J.K. A taxonomic model of withdrawal behavior: The adaptive response model // Human Resource Management Review. 1999. V. 9. № 4. P. 557–590.

10. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural Equation Modeling. 1999. Vol. 6. P. 1–55.

11. Krach S.K., McCreery M.P., Guerard J. Cultural-linguistic test adaptations: Guidelines for selection, alteration, use, and review // School Psychology International. 2017. V. 38. № 1. P. 3–21.

12. Ladebo O.J. Effects of work-related attitudes on the intention to leave the profession: An examination of school teachers in Nigeria // Emotional Management Administration and Leadership. 2005. V. 33. № 3. P. 355–369.

13. Loewenthal K.M. An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2 ed.). Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 2001.

14. Maslach C., Jackson S.E., Leiter M. The Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. In C.P. Zalaquett, R.J. Wood (Eds.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 191–218). The Scarecrow Press, 1997.

15. Schaufeli W.B., Bakker A.B., Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2006. V. 66. № 4. P. 701–716.

16. Schaufeli W.B., Taris T.W., Bakker A. Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hide: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. Burke (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (193–217). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006.

17. Schmidt G.B., Park G., Keeney J., Ghumman S. Job apathy: Scale development and initial validation // Journal of Career Assessment. 2017. V. 25. № 3. P. 484–501.

18. Spector P.E. Relationships of organizational frustration with reported behavioral reactions of employees // Journal of Applied Psychology. V. 60. № 5. P. 635–637.

19. Spence J.T., Robbins A.S. Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1992. V. 58. № 1. P. 160–178.

20. Vanagas G., Bihari-Axelsson S., Vanagienė V. Do age, gender and marital status influence job strain development for general practioner? // Medicina (Kaunas). 2004. V. 40. № 10. P. 1014–1018.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up