RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY AS A PART OF UNIVERSAL SCIENCE

This short paper considers the discussion about a role of Russian psychology within the context of the worldwide science. A viewpoint that Russian psychology is a part of the global science is proposed. Despite regional specifics of science could be useful for itsfactological, phenomenological, and theoretical aspects, indigenous nationalspecifics of methodology and experimental techniques are fraught with danger for development of psychology. A main statement of this paper is that purposeful isolation of Russian psychology in order to preserve identity is harmful in general. The unique national features will manifest themselves naturallythrough development of psychology within the framework of the worldwide scientific methodology.

Keywords

Russian psychology, science, paradigm, globalization, regional science

Acknowledgment

The work was performed under state assignment 25.5666.2017/8.9

Received

20.03.2019

Publication date

25.03.2019

Number of characters

13343

Cite

GOST	Korovkin S. RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY AS A PART OF UNIVERSAL SCIENCE // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2019. – V. 40. – Issue 2 C. 132-136 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920004063-5-1 (circulation date: 24.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004063-5
MLA	Korovkin, S. "RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY AS A PART OF UNIVERSAL SCIENCE." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40.2 (2019):132-136. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004063-5
APA	Korovkin S. (2019). RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY AS A PART OF UNIVERSAL SCIENCE. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40(2), pp.132-136 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004063-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1532

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aleksandrov YU.I., Aleksandrova N.L. Komplementarnost' kul'turospecifichnyh tipov poznaniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psihologiya. 2010. № 3. P. 18–35. (In Russian)

2. Dvojnin A.M. Krizis v psihologii ili krizis identichnosti rossijskih psihologov? // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. V. 36. № 6. P. 94–107. (In Russian)

3. Golovej L.A., ZHuravlev A.L., Tarabrina N.V. B.G.Anan'ev i mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya v psihologii (k 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 5. P. 108–117. (In Russian)

4. ZHuravlev A.L., Mironenko I.A., YUrevich A.V. Psihologicheskaya nauka v global'nom mire: Vyzovy i perspektivy // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 2. P. 58–71. (In Russian)

5. Zuev K.B. Kul'tura nauchnyh publikacij v Rossii i zapadnyh stranah na primere psihologii // Psihologos. 2006. № 3–4. P. 57–60. (In Russian)

6. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revolyucij. Moscow: AST, 2003. (In Russian)

7. Merton R. Social'naya teoriya i social'naya struktura. Moscow: AST, 2006. (In Russian)

8. Problemy sub"ektov v postneklassicheskoj nauke. Moscow: Kogito-centr, 2007. (In Russian)

9. Spiridonov V.F., Lifanova S.S. Insajt i mental'nye operatory, ili mozhno li poshagovo reshit' insajtnuyu zadachu // Psihologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2013. V. 10. № 3. P. 54–63. (In Russian)

10. Stepin B.C. Nauchnoe soznanie i cennosti tekhnogennoj civilizacii // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. № 10. P. 16–17. (In Russian)

11. YUrevich A.V., ZHuravlev A.L. Vvedenie // Teoriya i metodologiya: postnekrassicheskaya perspektiva. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2007. P. 7–12. (In Russian)

12. YAsnickij A. Kurt Koffka: “U uzbekov EST' illyuzij!”. Zaochnaya polemika mezhdu Luriej i Koffkoj // Psihologicheskij zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka “Dubna”. 2013. № 3. P. 1–25. (In Russian)

13. Blum B. The lifespan of a lie // Medium, June 7, 2018. Rezhim dostupa: https://medium.com/s/trustissues/the-lifespan-of-a-lie-d869212b1f62

14. Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C.-L., Cleeremans A. Behavioral Priming: It's All in the Mind, but Whose Mind? // PLoS ONE 7(1), 2012.

15. German T.P., Barrett H.C. Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture // Psychological Science. 2005. № 10. P. 1–5.

16. Hambrick D.Z., Engle R.W. The Role of Working Memory in Problem Solving // The Psychology of Problem Solving Vol. 6. Cambridge University Press, 2013. P. 176–205.

17. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science // Science. 2015. P. 1–8.

18. Quesada J., Kintsch W., Gomez E. Complex problem-solving: a field in search of a definition? // Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2005. Vol.6. No.1. P. 5–33.