The ideology of open science and the prospect of blockchain

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Leading researcher, Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control”, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6

The ideology of open science is presented in the article as an instrument for overcoming the crisis that arose in science under the influence of the development of Internet technologies. It is shown how this ideology developed through attempts to form a concept of the Internet space of modern science in the technological and philosophical plans. The projects of overcoming the crisis in science with the help of blockchain-applications are considered. It is asserted that the monitoring of ideological trends is turning into an instrument of technological forecasting, that is, in the instrument of determining the field of the technical solutions in demand.

Keywordsblockchain, ideology, ideological trends, open science, technological forecasting
Publication date28.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 1580

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Berners-Lee T., Shadbolt N. (2009) Rozhdenie nauki ob Internete [The birth of Internet science] Den za dnem. Nauka. Kultura. Obrazovanie (

2. Blockchain for Open Science – the living document (2017) Blockchain for Science (

3. Bradley J.-C. (2006) Open Notebook Science. [Published on Drexel COAS E-learning Blog, September 26] (

4. Brock J. (2018) Mapping the blockchain for science landscape Hacker Noon (

5. Carafano J. J. (2012) Wiki at War: Conflict in a Socially Networked World. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

6. Chernozub S.P. (2018) Blokcheyn i socialnie seti novogo pokoleniya: utopiya, revolyuciya, socialniy vizov [Blockchain and Social Networks of the New Generation: Utopia, Revolution, Social Challenge]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 1, pp. 134–142.

7. Destutt de Tracy A. (2013) Elementi Ideologii. Ch. 1. Ideologiya v sobstvennom smisle slova. Gl. 11. Razmishleniya o predshestvuyuschem i o sposobe Kondilyaka analizirovat misl [Elements of the Ideology. Part 1. Ideology in the proper sense of the word. Ch. 11. Reflections on the previous and on Condillac's navel to analyze the idea] Voprosi filosofii, no. 8, pp. 149–154.

8. Egerev S.V., Yushin V.P. (2007) Budushchee rossiyskoy nauki v rabotah perestroechnih avtorov vzglyad cherez 20 let [The future of Russian science in works of perestroika authors is a glance in 20 years]. Nauka. Innovacii. Obrazovanie: almanah NIO. Issue. 2 (

9. E-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice (2009) Routledge.

10. Fecher B., Friesike S. Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 2013.

11. Foley H. (2018) Many Scientific Studies Are Bogus, but Blockchain Can Help. Scientific American (

12. Hannay T. (2007) Interview with Timo Hannay, Head of Web Publishing, Nature Publishing Group (

13. Huillet M. (2018) Oxford Profs Plan Launch of World's First Blockchain-Based, Decentralized University. Cointelegraph (

14. Jankowski N. W. (2007) Exploring e-Science: An Introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, no. 12, pp. 549–562 ( com0549.pdf).

15. Kouzes R. T., Myers J. D., Wulf W. A. (1996) Collaboratories: Doing science on the Internet. IEEE Computer, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 40–46.

16. Matzat U. (2004) Academic communication and Internet discussion groups: Transfer of information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 221–255.

17. Mirskaya E.Z. (2010) Novie informacionno-kommunikacionnie tehnologii v rossiyskoy akademicheskoy nauke: istoriya i rezultati [New ITs in Russian Academy science: history and results]. CyberLeninka (

18. Pool R. (1993) Beyond databases and e-mail. Science 261 (August), pp. 841–843

19. Science goes darknet? (2017) Blockchain for Science (

20. Trujillo J. L., Fromhart S., Srinivas V. (2017) Evolution of blockchain technology. Insights from the GitHub platform Deloitte (

21. Wallerstein I. (2016) Centristskiy liberalizm kak ideologiya [Centrist Liberalism as an Ideology]. (

22. Wouters P. (1996). Cyberscience Kennis en Methode. Vol. 20, pp. 155–186.

23. Wyatt S., Scharnhorst A., Beaulieu A., Wouters P. (2013) Introduction to Virtual Knowledge Virtual Knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press.

Система Orphus