All
 
|
 
 


The Concept of Inclusive Institutions and Its Applications
 
PIIS086904990011530-5-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Eugene Balatsky 
Occupation: Director, Chief researcher
Affiliation:
Center for Macroeconomic Research in the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 4, 4th Veshnyakovskii pass., Moscow, 109456, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 3
Pages143-156
Abstract

The article discusses the concept of inclusive institutions (CII) put forward by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. Shows the analogies and parallels between CII and earlier economic theories and doctrines, shows their organic relationship and continuity. Particular emphasis is placed on more accurate definition of inclusive and extractive institutions, which is made possible by the introduction of the concepts of guarantees and freedoms for the two social groups – elites and masses. It is shown that in the absence of these clarifications, many systemic crises are not amenable to adequate explanation.

Keywordsinclusive institutions, extractive institutions, reforms, economic growth, evolution
Received14.09.2020
Publication date17.06.2017
Number of characters607
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 902

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. (2015b) Ekonomicheskie istoki diktaturi i demokratii [Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy]. Ìoscow: Publishing house of the HSE.
2. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. (2015à) Pochemu odni strani bogatie, a drugie bednie. Proishozhdenie vlasti, procvetaniya i nishcheti [Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty]. Ìoscow: AST.
3. Arslanov V. V. (2016à) “Inklyuzivnie institute” – osnovnoy faktor ustoychivogo rosta? Statya 1 [“Inclusive institutions” is the main factor of sustainable growth? Article 1]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost?, no. 4, pp. 36–47.
4. Arslanov V.V. (2016b) “Inklyuzivnie institute” – osnovnoy faktor ustoychivogo rosta? Statya 2 [“Inclusive institutions” is the main factor of sustainable growth? Article 2]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost?, no. 5, pp. 49–62.
5. Balatsky E.V. (2015à) Koncepciya antihrupkosti socialnih sistem i ee prilozheniya [The concept of antifragile of social systems and its applications]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost?, no. 6, pp. 116–130.
6. Balatsky E.V. (2013) Novie harakteristiki globalnogo kapitalizma [New features of global capitalism]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, no. 3, pp. 59–80.
7. Balatsky E.V. (2015b) Upravlencheskie paradoksi reform v universitetskom sektore [Management Paradoxes of Reform in University Sector]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy associacii, no. 2, pp. 124–149.
8. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. (2016) Ocenka institucionalnogo razvitiya Rossii [The Assessment of the Institutional Development of Russia]. Ì.: Pero.
9. Bikov P. (2008) Nakanune velikoy revolyucii [On the Eve of the Great Revolution]. Ekspert, no. 42(631) (http://expert.ru/expert/2008/42/nakanune  _velikoy_revolutsii/).
10. North D., Wallis D., Weingast B. (2011) Nasilie i socialnie poryadki. Konceptualnie ramki dlya interpretacii pismennoy istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History]. Ìoscow: Publishing House of The Gaidar Institute.
11. North D., Wallis D., Webb S., Weingast B. (2012) V teni nasiliya: uroki dlya obshchestv s ogranichennim dostupom k politicheskoy i ekonomicheskoy deyatelnosti. [In the Shadow of Violence: Lessons for Limited Access Societies to Political and Economic Activities] Ìoscow: Publishing house of the HSE.
12. Palacios-Huerta I. (ed.) (2016) Cherez 100 let: vedushchie ekonomisti predskazivayut budushchee [In 100 Years: Leading Economists Predict the Future]. Ìoscow: Publishing House Of The Gaidar Institute.
13. Piketty T. (2016) Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the twenty-first century]. Ìoscow: Ad Marginem Press.
14. Pliskevich N.M. (2013à) Vozmozhnosti transformacii v Rossii i koncepciya Norta–Uollisa–Vayngasta. Statya 1. Srivi modernizacii: vchera i segodnya [The Possibility of Transformation in Russia and the Concept of North–Wallis–Weingast. Article 1. Breakdowns of Modernization: Yesterday and Today]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost?, no. 5, pp. 37–50.
15. Pliskevich N.M. (2013b) Vozmozhnosti transformacii v Rossii i koncepciya Norta–Uollisa–Vayngasta. Statya 2. Porogovie usloviya perehoda dlya obshchestva [The Possibility of Transformation in Russia and the Concept of North–Wallis–Weingast. Article 2. Threshold Conditions for the Transition]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost?, no. 6, pp. 45–60.
16. Polterovich V.M. (2007) Elementi teorii reform [Elements of the Theory of Reforms]. Ìoscow: Ekonomika.
17. Polterovich V.M. (1999) Institucionalnie lovushki i ekonomicheskie reformi [Institutional Traps and Economic Reforms]. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metodi, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1–37.
18. Taleb N. N. (2014) Antihrupkost. Kak izvlech vigodu iz haosa [Antifragile. Things That Gain From Disorder]. Ìoscow: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus.
19. Taleb N.N. (2009) Cherniy lebed. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti [The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable]. Ìoskow: KoLibri.
20. Taleb N.N. (2011) Odurachennie sluchaynostyu. Skritaya rol shansa v biznese i zhizni [Fooled by Randomness. The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Market]. Ìoscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber.
21. Zaostrovcev A.P. (2014) Istoriya po Asemoglu-Robinsonu: instituti, razvitie i predeli avtoritarnogo rosta [Story via the Acemoglu–Robinson: Institutions, Development and the Limits of Authoritarian Growth]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost?, no. 3, pp. 32–43.
22. Zolo D. (2010) Demokratiya i slozhnost: realisticheskiy podhod [Democracy and Complexity: A Realistic Approach]. Ìoscow: Publishing house of the HSE.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up