All
 
|
 
 


Russian Informal Institutions and Establishment of Efficient Safeguards for Personal Liberty and Private Property?
 
PIIS086904990011491-2-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Sergey Zhavoronkov 
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Address: 3–5, Gazetny per., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
Konstantin Yanovskiy
Occupation: Director, Institutional analysis division chief
Affiliation:
Shomron Center for Economic Policy Research (Israel)
Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Address: 3–5, Gazetny per., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 5
Pages120-133
Abstract

Local customs (informal institutions) allegedly incompatible with Rule of Law, personal liberties and private property is the strongest argument against new attempt to transplant these institutions in the Russia. Here we explore its validity in two ways. We try to compare Russian institutions with countries which succeeded to adopt some of above mentioned institutions: Germany, Japan, India, Spain. Then we observe data of public opinion surveys (regarding basic values, private property, freedoms and liberties). We also tried to interpret some demographic and criminal statistics dynamics as indications of the state of informal institution. Eventually we arrived to conclusions, that informal institutions and popular beliefs could damage the efficiency of adoption of basic safeguards for liberty and property, but these problems are quite comparable to problems of countries taken for comparison in their initial, pre-reform conditions. Civic society development in Russia shows growing maturity of the people and gradually growing demand for advanced institutions. The initial conditions for reforms are far from perfect but nor grave, not incompatible with future successes.

Keywordsinformal institutions, modernization, Russian modernization, limited government, economic freedoms, political freedom, traditional values
Received13.09.2020
Publication date17.10.2017
Number of characters486
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 604

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Azari J.R., Smith J.K. (2012) Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies Source. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37–55.
2. Downs A. (2009) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harvard Univ. Press.
3. Filatov S., Lunkin R. (2005) Statistika rossiskoy religioznosty: magia tcyfr i neodnoznachnaya realnost [Russian religiosity statistics: magic of the Numbers and ambiguous Reality] Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 6 (http://www.  isras.ru/files/File/Socis/2005–6/filatov_lunkin_religion.pdf).
4. Gaidar Y. (2009) Vlast’ i sobstvennost’ [The power and Property]. St.-Petersburg: Norma.
5. Gel’man V. (2014) The Rise and Decline of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia. Demokratizatsiya, vol. 22, issue 4, pp. 503–522.
6. Green D. (2009) Vozvraschenie v grazhdanskoe obschestvo. Sotsial’noe obespechenie bez uchastiya gosudarstva [Reinventing Civil Society Rediscovery of Welfare without Politics]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo.
7. Hunter G. (1968) The Transfer of Institutions from Developed to Developing. Countries African Affairs, vol. 67, no. 266, pp. 3–10.
8. Institucionalnye ogranichenia sovremennogo ekonomichåskogo rosta (2011) [Institutional constraints of modern economic Growth]. Moscow: “Delo”.
9. Le Bon G. (2014) Psikhologiya narodov i mass [Psychology of the peoples]. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium.
10. Leoni B. (2008) Svoboda i zakon [Freedom and the Law]. Moscow: IRISEN.
11. Lerner D., Pevsner L. (1964) The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: The Free Press of The Macmillan Co.
12. Lisin V., Yanovskiy K., Zhavoronkov S. (2016) Popytki modernizatsii v Rossii. Sud’ba sobstvennika i ego sobstvennosti (instituonal’ny analiz) [Attempts to Reform Russia: Tracking Back the Liberty and the Property] (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2732384). 
13. Meagher K. (2007) Introduction: Special Issue on ‘Informal Institutions and Development in Africa’ Source. Africa Spectrum, vol. 42, no. 3, Informal Institutions and Development in Africa, pp. 405–418.
14. O’Donnell G. (1998) Polyarchies and (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America’ Paper presented at the Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, September.
15. Oleinik A. (2005) Transfer of Institutions: Actors and Constraints – The Russian Case in a Global Context’ HWWA Discussion paper #320, Hamburgisches Welt-Wirtschafts-Archiv (HWWA) Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
16. Pipes R. (2000) Sobstvennost’ i svoboda [Property and Freedom]. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politechnicheskikh issledovaniy.
17. Rosenzweig P. (2003) The Over-Criminalization of Social and Economic Conduct. Heritage Foundation. Legal Memorandum N 7. April 17 (http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm7.cfm). 
18. Roy T. (2002) Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the Link. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 109–130.
19. Sa’Adah A. (2006) Regime Change: Lessons from Germany on Justice, Institution Building, and Democracy. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 303–323.
20. Walsh B.W., Joslyn T.M. (2010) Without Intent: How Congress Is Eroding the Criminal Intent Requirement in Federal Law. The Heritage Foundation. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (http://s3.amazonaws.com/  thf_media/2010/pdf/WithoutIntent_lo-res.pdf#page=11).
21. Yanovskiy M., Zhavoronkov S. (2013) Electoral Demand for Secure Private Property: On the Edge of Human Capital and Institutions (March 23) (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238507). 
22. Zhavoronkov S., Yanovskiy K. (2015) Konstitutsionnaya economica i zaschita chastnoy sobstvennosti [Constitutional economics and private property safeguard]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennîst’, no. 3, pp. 34–46.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up