All
 
|
 
 


On the limits of the globalization process (to propounding of a problem). Article 1. About spatial and temporary framework of process and the main contours of the semantic field of a concept of globalization
 
PIIS086904990011472-1-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Yakov Shemyakin 
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Latin America
Address: 21 Bolshaya Ordinka St., Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6
Pages158-172
Abstract

The aim of this article is to investigate the character of the correlation among global and universal dimensions of the reality of “the world of people”, as well as the analysis of the meaning of the concepts, indicated these dimensions and their correspondence in the space of meanings of culture. According to the author’s conception, “global” and “universal” – are the concepts of equal volume as far as they both cover the mankind in whole, but with not the one and the same content because they fix the different features of it: stability and variability. Global – is the system of all connections covered the whole world; its historical formation was gradual. The term “universal” includes the general features, inherent to all people regardless to their belonging to this or that epoch or culture. They have existed as long as the Homo sapiens have whereas in different historical forms.

Keywordsglobalization, global, universal, local, civilization, culture
Received12.09.2020
Publication date17.12.2017
Number of characters973
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 491

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Bessoznatelnoe: Priroda. Funktsii. Metody issledovaniya [Unconscious: Nature. Functions. Methods of research] (1985) Tbilisi: Metsniereba. Vol. 4.
2. Boxer Ch.R. (1970) Plata es Sangre. Sidelights on Drain of Spanish-American Silver in the Far East, 1550–1700. Philippine Studies, vol. 18, pp. 457–475.
3. Eisenstadt S.N. (2001) The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity. International Sociology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 320–340.
4. Flynn D.O., Giraldez A. (2006) Globalization began in 1571. Globalization and Global History. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 232–247.
5. Frank A.G. (1993) The Bronze Age World System and its Cycles. Current Anthropology, no. 34, pp. 383–413.
6. Frank A.G., Thompson W.R. (2005) Bronze Age Economic Expansion and Contraction Revisited.
7. Journal of World History, no. 16 (2), pp. 115–172.
8. Fromm E. (1990) Begstvo ot svobodi [Escape from Freedom]. Moscow: Progress.
9. Gamkrelidze T.V., Ivanov V.V. (1984) Indoevropeiskii yazyk i  indoevropeitsy. Rekonstruktsiya i istoriko-tipologicheskii analiz prayazyka i protokultury [Indo-European language and Indo-Europeans. Reconstruction and historical-typological analysis of proto-language and protoculture] Tbilisi: Tbilisi Univ. Publishing House. Vol. II.
10. Globalization and Global History (2006) London; New York: Routledge.
11. Iberica Americans (2002) Prazdnik v iberoamerikanskoi culture [Holiday at Latin America culture]. Moscow: IMLI RAN.
12. Ionov I.N. (2015) Mirovaya istoriya v global’nyi vek: Novoe istoricheskoe soznanie [World History in the Global Century: A New Historical Consciousness]. Moscow: Aquilon.
13. Ivanov V.V. (2009) O vybore very v Vostochnoi Evrope [On the choice of faith in Eastern Europe]. Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kultury [Selected works on semiotics and history of culture. Vol. 5. Moscow: Znak. Mifologiya and folklore].
14. Jaspers K. (1991) Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of history]. Moscow: Politizdat.
15. Levi-Strauss C. (1962) La pensee savage. Paris: Plon.
16. Meier M.S. (2002) Dolgii serebryanyi vek Vostoka [The long silver age of the East]. Vostok – Zapad – Rossiya [East – West – Russia]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, pp. 145–160.
17. Mil’kov V.V. (2015) Issledovanie kontsepta “zemlya” v russkom samosoznanii [Study of the concept of “land” in Russian identity]. Rossiya v arkhitekture globalnogo mira: tsivilizatsionnoe izmerenie. Moscow: Znaki slavyanskoy kul’tury; Znak, pp. 40–66.
18. Pomeranz K. (2000) The Great Divergence: China, Europa, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
19. Pomerants G.S. (1995a) Ikonologicheskoe myishlenie kak sistema i dialog semioticheskih sistem. Pomerants G.S. Vyihod iz transa. M.: Yurist, pp. 338–345.
20. Pomerants G.S. (1995b) Troitsa Rubleva i trinitarnoe myishlenie, Pomerants G.S. Vyihod iz transa [Escape from trance]. Moscow: Yurist, pp. 316–337.
21. Pomerants G.S. (2003) “Velikie natsii zhivut mirovymi zadachami” [Great Nations Live by the Worldwide Problems]. Zapadniki i natsionalisty: vozmozhen li dialog? [Westernizers and nationalists: is dialogue possible?]. Moscow: OGI.
22. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2001a) Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: Vzaimodeystvie tsivilizatsiy v kontekste vsemirnoy istorii [Europe and Latin America: Interaction of civilizations in the context of world history]. Moscow: Nauka.
23. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2013b) Fenomen “pogranichnosti”: sotciokul’turnoe soderzhanie I istoricheskie tipy [The Phenomenon of “borderline”: socio-cultural content and historical types]. Dialog so vremenem. Al’manakh intellectual’noy istorii [The Dialogue with Time. Almahac of intellectual history], vyp. 42. Moscow: RAS Institute of Oriental Studies, pp. 23–45.
24. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2009) Granitsa (protsess perekhoda i tip sistemnosti) [Boundary (transition process and type of system)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, no. 5, pp. 119–122.
25. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2001b) Latinoamerikanskii prazdnik kak predmet tsivilizatsionnogo issledovaniya [The Latin American holiday as a subject of civilizational research], Latinskaya Amerika, no. 11, pp. 43–62.
26. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2014a) Subekumeny i “pogranichnye” tsivilizatsii v sravnitelno-istoricheskoi perspektive (O kharaktere sootnosheniya Yazyka, Teksta i Shrifta). Statya 1 [Sub-ecumenes and “borderline” civilizations in a comparatively historical perspective (On the nature of the relationship of the Language, Text and Font). Article 1]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, no. 2, pp. 113–123.
27. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2014b) Subekumeny i “pogranichnye” tsivilizatsii v sravnitelno-istoricheskoi perspektive (O kharaktere sootnosheniya Yazyka, Teksta i Shrifta). Statya 2 [Sub-ecumenes and “borderline” civilizations in a comparatively historical perspective (On the nature of the relationship of the Language, Text and Font). Article 2]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 3, pp. 119–129.
28. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2003) V poiskakh smysla. Iz istorii filosofii i religii [In search of meaning. From the history of philosophy and religion]. Moscow: Ripol-Classic, pp. 210–242.
29. Shemyakin Ya.G., Shemyakina O.D. (2008a) Latinoamerikanskii karnaval i karnavalizovannye formy russkoi kul’tury: popytka sravneniya [Latin American carnival and carnivalized forms of Russian culture: an attempt at comparison]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 5, pp. 62–77.
30. Shemyakin Ya.G., Shemyakina O.D. (2008b) Latinoamerikanskii karnaval i karnavalizovannye formy russkoi kul’tury: popytka sravneniya [Latin American carnival and carnivalized forms of Russian culture: an attempt at comparison]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 6, pp. 53–69.
31. Shemyakin Ya.G. (2013a) O kharaktere sootnosheniya Yazyka, Teksta i Shrifta v tsivilizatsiyakh “pogranichnogo” tipa [On the nature of the relationship of the Language, Text and Font in “border” type civilizations]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya, no. 1, pp. 15–26.
32. Tolstaya S.M. (2012) Yazychestvo [Paganism], Slavyanskie drevnosti. Etnolingvisticheskiy slovar [Slavic antiquities. Ethnolinguistic dictionary]. Vol. 5. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia.
33. Toporov V.N. (2007) Balkanskii makrotekst i drevnebalkanskaya neo-eneoliticheskaya tsivilizatsiya (obshchii vzglyad) [Balkan macrotext and ancient Balkan neo-Eneolithic civilization (general view)]. Vostok i Zapad v balkanskoi kartine mira. Pamyati Vladimira Nikolaevicha Toporova [East and West at the Balkan outlook. In memoriam Vladimir Nikolaevich Toporov]. Moscow: Indrik, pp. 1–25.
34. Toporov V.N. (2010) Mirovoe derevo: Universalnye znakovye kompleksy [World Tree: Universal Signed Complexes], vol. 1. Moscow: Rukopisnye pamyatniki Drevney Rusi.
35. Toporov V.N. (1989) Prostranstvo kul’tury i vstrechi v nem [The space of culture and encounters in it], Vostok-Zapad. Issledovaniya. Perevody. Publikatsii [East-West. Researching. Translations. Publications], vyp. 4. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 6–17.
36. Toporov V.N. (1995) Svyatost i svyatye v russkoi dukhovnoi kulture. T. 1. Pervyi vek khristianstva na Rusi [Holiness and Saints in Russian Spiritual Culture. Vol. 1. The first century of Christianity in Russia]. Moscow: Gnozis.
37. Trubachev O.N. (2013) K istokam Rusi. Narod i yazyk [To the origins of Russia. The people and the language]. Moscow: Algorithm.
38. Wallerstein I. (1995) Unthinking Social Sciences. London: Polity Press.
39. Wescott R.W. (2000) Comparing Civilizations. An Unconsensual View on Culture History. Atherton: Atherton Press.
40. Wilkinson D. (2006) Globalization. Globalization and Global History. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 68–78.
41. Zubov A.B. (1990) Parlamentskaya demokratiya i politicheskaya traditsiya Vostoka [Parliamentary democracy and the political tradition of the East]. Moscow: Nauka.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up