Centrifugal and Centripetal Trends in Political Programs of National Movements of South Slavs of Austria-Hungary, 1914—1918

 
PIIS013038640008649-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640008649-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 2
Pages41-57
Abstract

The ethnic and political development of the Austro-Hungarian Empire as a multinational monarchy at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century was determined by several groups of contradictions. First, the internal contradictions between the state and ethnic and social communities. Secondly, the interests of the peoples of Austria-Hungary, whose national movements sought national selfdetermination and its political and legal formalization in the form of national statehood, did not coincide completely or permanently with each other. Thirdly, by the constant contradictions between two full-fledged peoples, three peoples ‘in formation, and the rest — non-full-fledged nations. The Poles, Czechs, and Croats, although they were not equal in their political and legal status to the Austrian Germans and Hungarians (Magyars), had their own state law, which made their position ambivalent. Fourthly, the cross-border political influence of neighbouring states on the internal political development of those regions of the Empire, certain peoples of which were in ethnic kinship with the population of adjacent national and multinational states which conflicted with the desire of the dynasty and the central authorities of Cisleithania and Transleithania to limit the problem of strategic minorities exclusively to the imperial space. Three multinational Empires — Austria- Hungary, Russia, and the Ottoman Empire — failed to complete the modernization process and to provide their peoples with new legal forms of national selfdetermination within the existing borders. In 1919 — 1920 in Versailles (as well as in Neuill-sur-Seine, in the Saint-Germain Palace, in the Grand Trianon Palace and in Sevres), the victorious powers (the Great Britain, France, the US, and Italy) decided the fate of the countries of Central (Central and Southeastern) Europe.

KeywordsHabsburg Monarchy, Multinational Empire, South Slavs, the Croats, the Serbs, the Muslims, the Slovenians, the Czechs, the Austrian Germans, the Magyars, National Self-determination, Centrifugal and Centripetal Trends, National and Social Revolutions
Received03.02.2020
Publication date27.03.2020
Number of characters41695
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 730

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avstro-Vengriya: integratsionnye protsessy i natsional'naya spetsifika. Otv. red. O.V. Khavanova. M., 1997.

2. Avstro-Vengriya: opyt mnogonatsional'nogo gosudarstva. Otv. red. T. M. Islamov, A. I. Miller. M., 1995.

3. Ajrapetov A. G. Vzglyad istorikov na realii mnogonatsional'nogo gosudarstva. — Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, vyp. 3—4. Tambov, 1996, s. 28-35.

4. Ajrapetov A. G. Istoricheskaya sud'ba Avstro-Vengrii. — Voprosy istorii, 1999, № 1, s. 137—144.

5. Vengersko-khorvatskoe soglashenie 1868 g. Kratkij ocherk i perevod s prilozheniem. SPb., 1910.

6. Vishnyakov Ya., Timofeev A., Miloradovich G. Armiya bez gosudarstva. Ot serbskogo k yugoslavyanskomu dobrovol'cheskomu korpusu v Rossii vo vremya Pervoj mirovoj vojny Sb. dok. M., 2014.

7. Votselka K. Istoriya Avstrii. M., 2007.

8. Zemaљski ustav (statut) za Bosnu i Khertsegovinu. Previshњe riјesheњe od 17. februara 1910. o uvoђeњu ustavnikh uredaba. Saraјevo, [1910].

9. Istoriya Vengrii, t. II. Otv. red. T. M. Islamov. M., 1972.

10. Kamberovich Kh. Musul'manskaya politicheskaya ehlita i khorvatskie politicheskie programmy v Bosnii i Gertsegovine v nachale XX veka. — Avstro-Vengriya: Tsentral'naya Evropa i Balkany (Kh1—KhKh vv.). Rossijsko-avstrijskij al'manakh: istoricheskie i kul'turnye paralleli. Vyp. IV. Pamyati V. I. Frejdzona. Otv. red. S. A. Romanenko, I. V. Kryuchkov, A. S. Stykalin. SPb., 2011, s. 294-295.

11. Kirilina L. A., Pil'ko N. S., Churkina I. V. Istoriya Slovenii. SPb., 2011.

12. Kontler L. Istoriya Vengrii. Tysyacheletie v tsentre Evropy. M., 2002.

13. Krestiћ V., Љushiћ R. Programi i statuti srpskikh politichkikh stranaka do 1918 godine. Beograd, 1991.

14. Kryuchkov I. V. Vengriya i slavyanskij mir v poslednej treti XIX — nachale XX v. Stavropol', 2001.

15. Liven D. Navstrechu ognyu. Imperiya, vojna i konets tsarskoj Rossii. M., 2017.

16. Matkovich S. Khorvatskie politicheskie partii i ideya modernizatsii v nachale XX veka. — Avstro-Vengriya: Tsentral'naya Evropa i Balkany (Kh1—KhKh vv.). Rossijsko-avstrijskij al'manakh: istoricheskie i kul'turnye paralleli. Pamyati V. I. Frejdzona. Otv. red. S. A. Romanenko, I. V. Kryuchkov, A. S. Stykalin, vyp. IV. SPb., 2011, s. 233—243.

17. Pavlenko O. V. Katastrofa «russkoj Marsel'ezy» v 1917 g. i ee osmyslenie v sovremennoj istoriografii. — Istoricheskij vestnik. Revolyutsionnyj tranzit. Rossiya, t. 23. M., 2018, s. 12—37.

18. Politicheskie partii i obschestvennye dvizheniya v monarkhii Gabsburgov 1848—1914 gg. Ocherki. Otv. red. O. V. Khavanova. M., 2018.

19. Politicheskij stroj sovremennykh gosudarstv, t. II. SPb, 1910.

20. Romanenko S. A. Mezhdu «proletarskim internatsionalizmom» i «slavyanskim bratstvom». Rossijsko-yugoslavskie otnosheniya v kontekste ehtnopoliticheskikh konfliktov v Srednej Evrope. Ot nachala KhKh v. do1991 g. M., 2011.

21. Romanenko S. A. Natsional'nye revolyutsii v Avstro-Vengrii i ee raspad v predstavleniyakh bol'shevikov. — Chicherinskie chteniya. «Revolyutsionnyj 1917 god»: poisk paradigm revolyutsionnogo razvitiya mira. Tambov, 2018, s. 131—146.

22. Romanenko S. A. Obraz revolyutsionnoj Rossi v Avstro-Vengerskoj imperii mezhdu Fevralem i Oktyabrem 1917 g. — Rossijsko-avstrijski al'manakh: istoricheskie i kul'turnye paralleli, vyp. VI. Stavropol', 2017, s. 91—97.

23. Romanenko S. A. Rossiya i Avstro-Vengriya: dva tipa revolyutsii. Po materialam rossijskoj pressy. — Istoricheskij vestnik. Revolyutsionnyj tranzit. Rossiya, t. 23. M., 2018, s. 78—102.

24. Sobranie konstitutsionnykh aktov. Vyp. II. Konstitutsii Avstrii — Avstro-Vengrii — Vengrii — Anglii. M., 1908, s. 3—47.

25. Sovremennye konstitutsii. Sbornik dejstvuyuschikh konstitutsionnykh aktov, t. 1. SPb., 1905.

26. Tumach povlastitsa, zakona, uredaba i drugikh nareђeњa srpske narodne tsrkvene autonomiјe u Ugarskoј, Khrvatskoј i Slavoniјi. Novi Sad, 1897.

27. Tymovskij S., Kenevich Ya., Khol'tser E. Istoriya Pol'shi. M., 2004.

28. Uchastie yugoslavskikh trudyaschikhsya v Oktyabr'skoj revolyutsii i grazhdanskoj vojne v SSSR. Sbornik dokumentov i materialov. M., 1976.

29. Formy natsional'nogo dvizheniya v sovremennykh gosudarstvakh. SPb, 1905.

30. Frejdzon V. I. Istoriya Khorvatii. SPb., 2001.

31. Frejdzon V. I. K istorii bosnijsko-musul'manskogo ehtnosa. — Formirovanie natsij v Tsentral'noj i Yugo-Vostochnoj Evrope. M., 1981, s. 329—343.

32. Chekhiya i Slovakiya v KhKh v. Ocherki istorii, t. 1. Otv. red. V. V. Mar'ina. M., 2005.

33. Cheshsko-slovatskij (Chekhoslovatskij) korpus. Dokumenty i materialy, v 2-kh t. M., 2013-2018.

34. Shimov Ya. Avstro-Vengerskaya imperiya. M., 2003.

35. Yasi O. Raspad Gabsburgskoj monarkhii. M., 2011.

36. Cipek T, Matković Stj. Programatski dokumenti hrvatskih političkih stranaka i skupina. 1842.— 1914. Zagreb, 2006.

37. Cipek T., Vradečić J. Hrestomatija liberalnih ideja u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb, 2004.

38. Goldstein I. Hrvatska povijest. Zagreb, 2003.

39. Hrvatske pravice. Sastavio Petar Požar. Split — Zagreb, 1990.

40. Magyarországi pártprogramok 1867—1919. Budapest, 2003.

41. Österreichische Parteiprogramme 1868—1966. Hrsg. von K. Berchtold. München — Oldenburg, 1967. Zgodovinski arhiv komunističke partije Jugoslavije, T. V. Socijalistično gibanje v Sloveniji. 1869—1920. Beograd, 1951.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up