Всего подписок: 4, всего просмотров: 457
Оценка читателей: голосов 0
1. Schelling T. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2008. 312 p.
2. Kahn H. On Escalation: Metaphors and Scenarios. New York, NY, Frederick Praeger, 1965. 308 p.
3. Brodie B. Escalation and the Nuclear Option. Santa-Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 1965. 88 p.
4. Davis P., Stan P. Concepts and Models of Escalation. Santa-Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 1984. 92 p.
5. Snyder J. The Soviet Strategic Culture: Implications for Limited Nuclear Operation. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 1977. 48 p.
6. Yeaw C. 21st Century Air Force Nuclear Deterrence and Escalation. Presentation at Cross-Domain Deterrence Seminar, Center for Global Security Research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 18–19.11.2014. Available at: https://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20200426144033/https://www.slideshare.net/LivermoreLab/yeaw-llnl-multi-domain-deterrence-yeaw (accessed 11.12.2022).
7. Hersman R. Wormhole Escalation in the New Nuclear Age. Texas National Security Review, 2020, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 90-109. DOI: 10.26153/tsw/10220
8. Lock-Pullan R. How to Rethink War: Conceptual Innovation and AirLand Battle Doctrine. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2005, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 679-702. DOI: 10.1080/01402390500301087
9. Богданов К., Евтодьева М. США–КНР: механизмы и динамика гонки вооружений. Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 2021, т. 65, № 6, сс. 42-50. Bogdanov K., Yevtodyeva M. U.S.–China: Mechanisms and Dynamics of Arms Race. World Economy and International Relations, 2021, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 42-50. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-6-42-50
10. Евтодьева М. Развитие китайской системы A2/AD в контексте отношений США и КНР. Общественные науки и современность, 2022, № 4, сс. 77-92. Yevtodyeva M. Development of the Chinese A2/AD System in the Context of US–China Relations. Social Sciences and Contemporaneity, 2022, no. 4, pp. 77-92. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S0869049922040062
11. Todd Lopez C. Defense Secretary Says ‘Integrated Deterrence’ Is Cornerstone of U.S. Defense. U.S. Department of Defense, 30.04.2021. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2592149/defense-secretary-says-integrated-deterrence-is-cornerstone-of-us-defense/ (accessed 11.12.2022).
12. Morgan F., et. al. Dangerous Thresholds. Managing Escalation in 21st Century. Santa-Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 2008. 245 p.
13. Иссерсон Г. Новые формы борьбы. (Опыт исследования современных войн.) Москва, Военгиз, 1940. 76 с. Isserson G. The New Forms of Struggle. (The Lessons Learned from Modern Warfare.) Moscow, Voengiz, 1940. 76 p. (In Russ.)
14. Герасимов В. Ценность науки – в предвидении. Военно-промышленный курьер, № 8 (476), 27.02.2013. Gerasimov V. The Value of Science is in Foresight. Voenno-promyshlennyi kur'er, 27.02.2013, no. 8 (476). (In Russ.) Available at: https://vpk.name/news/85159_cennost_nauki_v_predvidenii.html (accessed 11.12.2022).
15. Snyder G. The Balance of Power and the Balance of Terror. Seabury P., ed. The Balance of Power. San Francisco, CA, Chandler, 1965, pp. 184-201.
16. Smeets M. A Matter of Time: On the Transitory Nature of Cyberweapons. Journal of Strategic Studies, 2018, vol. 41, no. 1–2, pp. 6-32. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2017.1288107
17. Tertrais B. French Nuclear Deterrence Policy, Forces, and Future: A Handbook, Recherches & Documents. 2020, no. 4. Paris, Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, 2020. 73 p.
18. Manzo V., Miles A. The Logic of Integrating Conventional and Nuclear Planning. Arms Control Today, 2016, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 8-14. Available at: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2016-10/features/logic-integrating-conventional-nuclear-planning (accessed 11.12.2022).
19. Acton J. Escalation Through Entanglement: How the Vulnerability of Command-and-Control Systems Raises the Risks of an Inadvertent Nuclear War. International Security, 2018, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 56-99. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00320
20. Acton J., et al. Entanglement: Russian and Chinese Perspectives on Non-nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks. Washington, DC, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2017. 86 p.
21. Круглов В., Шубин А. О возрастающем значении упреждения противника в действиях. Военная мысль, 2021, № 12, cс. 27-34. Kruglov V., Shubin A. On the Increasing Importance of Preempting the Adversary in Hostilities. Voennaya mysl’, 2021, no. 12, pp. 27-34. (In Russ.) Available at: https://vm.ric.mil.ru/upload/site178/yQH4EuoqhP.pdf (accessed 11.12.2022).
22. Стучинский В., Корольков М. Пути противодействия реализации концепции США и НАТО “многодоменная битва”. Военная мысль, 2021, № 7, cс. 41-49. Stuchinsky V., Korolkov M. The Ways to Counter the U.S. and NATO ‘Multi-Domain Battle’ Concept. Voennaya mysl’, 2021, no. 7, pp. 41-49. (In Russ.) Available at: https://vm.ric.mil.ru/upload/site178/pdj6wywh3M.pdf (accessed 11.12.2022).
23. Стерлин А., Протасов А., Крейдин С. Современные трансформации концепций и силовых инструментов стратегического сдерживания. Военная мысль, 2019, № 8, cс. 7-12. Sterlin A., Protasov A., Kreydin S. The Modern Transformations of Strategic Deterrence Concepts and Tools of Force. Voennaya mysl’, 2019, no. 8, pp. 7-12. (In Russ.) Available at: https://vm.ric.mil.ru/Stati/item/203864/?ysclid=ldlh0h0v25468223136 (accessed 11.12.2022).
24. Герасимов В. Векторы развития военной стратегии. Красная звезда, 04.03.2019. Gerasimov V. The Development Vectors of Military Strategy. Krasnaya zvezda, 04.03.2019. (In Russ.) Available at: http://redstar.ru/vektory-razvitiya-voennoj-strategii/ (accessed 11.12.2022).