Все
 
 
 


Цифровые технологии для устойчивого развития: двойной вызов для устойчивого развития и перспективы инклюзивности
 
Код статьиS123456780015729-2-1
DOI10.18254/S123456780015729-2
Тип публикации Статья
Статус публикации Опубликовано
Авторы
Gidigbi Matthew Oladapo  
Должность: Department of Economics, Modibbo Adama University of Technology; School of Economics, University of Ibadan
Аффилиация:
Modibbo Adama University of Technology
University of Ibadan
Адрес: Нигерия
Название журналаLaw & Digital Technologies
ВыпускТом 1 № 1
Страницы27-36
Аннотация

Данная статья представляет собой обзорное исследование, в котором рассматривается соотношение цифровых технологий и устойчивого развития, а также правовые проблемы устойчивого развития. Цифровая технологическая инклюзия населения основывается на мобильных телефонах, которые в равной степени способствуют финансовой инклюзии и помогают в сокращении бедности. Цифровые технологии открывают широкие возможности для бизнеса и экономического роста. Кроме того, цифровые технологии успешно доказали свою актуальность. Цифровые технологии изменили способ достижения ЦУР и ускорили достижение ЦУР, особенно в условиях инклюзивности. Устойчивость и инклюзивность цифровых технологий должны стать задачей, которая должна быть решена с целью максимизации выгод от их применения для содействия устойчивому развитию. Рекомендуется, чтобы правительства на всех уровнях и учреждения несли ответственность за продвижение цифровых технологий и инфраструктуры, а также за предоставление большего количества основных услуг, которые будут стимулировать инвесторов в этой области. Правительства совместно с частными лицами должны оперативно принимать меры (например, сообщать о неисправностях) по обеспечению безопасности и поддержанию физических объектов, в то время как правоведы должны взять под свой контроль любые правовые проблемы, которые способствуют устранению таких проблем посредством закона.

Ключевые словацифровые технологии, устойчивое развитие, финансовая доступность
Источник финансированияSpecial appreciation to Yulia Kharitonova, Professor, Doctor of Law, MSU, Moscow, whose invitation to make a presentation at the regular conference of Lomonosov Moscow State University birthed this paper. Thanks to Aleksandr Alekseenko, Associate Professor, PhD (Law), Vladivostok, with whose collaboration and contribution to a monograph entitled "Ensuring the Rights of Investors in the Context of the Digitalization of the Economy: The Experience of European and Asian States" and my section contribution, entitled "Delinquency tendency in digital currency and its impact on credit", got Prof. to learn of me. I am grateful to you both, so far. Sincere appreciation to the anonymous reviewers who did their work without any form of prejudice. Your suggestions and comments had further enhanced this paper. Many thanks to you.
Получено01.07.2021
Дата публикации02.07.2021
Кол-во символов33635
Цитировать   Скачать pdf Для скачивания PDF необходимо авторизоваться

Оглавление

1. Meaning of Digital Technologies (DT) and Sustainable Development (SD)
2. Paradigm Shift in Achieving Sustainable Development in the Face of Digital Technologies
3. What Has Been the Stylised Challenges?
4. Prominent Factor in Charting SD
5. Poverty Phenomenon and SD
6. Digital Technologies and Expanded Opportunities
7. Give and Take Game of DT and SD: Drive Inclusion and Reduce Vulnerability
8. Effectiveness of Digital Technologies in Driving Sustainable Development Anchors on an Inclusive Economy
9. A Dual Challenge of Sustainability and Inclusivity
10. Conclusion and Recommendations
1

1. Meaning of Digital Technologies (DT) and Sustainable Development (SD)
2 Digital technologies are ways of automation that are premised on electronic tools. The advent of digital revolution changed almost everything that could possibly be changed, up to the point that those that recognised its effect are afraid of free application of digital technology in some areas, for instance, there is a control of genetically modified seeds – in the area of agriculture. Digital technologies involve a lot of things, such as internet, website, digital television, a smartphone, a digital currency (such as cryptocurrency), blockchain tech, a digital human (robot) among so many other things. In short, digital technologies save time, costs, facilitate ease of doing things and have many possibilities that were hardly envisaged in the past centuries. Digital technologies have improved considerably all facets of human lives. Digital technologies have witnessed enormous progress since the adoption of the Tunis Agenda for the Information Society in 2005 (UNCTAD 2019). The progress was enormous indeed: the population using the internet surpassed half of the world population in 2018 (UNCTAD 2019). With some enablers, digital technologies have now been integrated into everything, without much ado, digital technologies have come to stay, and so far, they have become part of human’s day-to-day activities/engagements.
3 On the other hand, Sustainable Development implies economic prosperity for all. Also, it entails social inclusion, economic and environmental sustainability, and it all gears towards human progress. It implies prosperity for the present generation without hampering the same for future generations. Sustainable Development is universal and holistic (Nakicenovic et al. 2019). This signifies the fact that all countries of the world are in the business of achieving the crystalized goals of the Sustainable Development as defined and itemised by the United Nations (UN) as a succeeded plan for Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). More so, the Sustainable Development is holistic because all the goals encapsulated in it are set to be achieved in unison. Sequel to this position, the SD goals as stipulated by the UN are more or less of making the government of a country be committed to the issue of governance because what any government might set to achieve as end goals under the political economy space are what makes up the SDGs.
4 Going by the lexicon meaning of sustainability it has four pillars, which includes a human in addition to the popularised three pillars. Proclaiming three pillars is justified by the fact that human is the recipient of the consequences of the actions towards the three pillars. Both forward and backward actions and their consequences revolve around the human. Therefore, it is three pillars with the human at the centre of the three-piece pillars. Figure 1 shows the three pillars of sustainability as expected in the instance of sustainable development. Furthermore, Figure 2 represents the interconnectivity of the three pillars of sustainability and prosperity to people, with governance being germane in administering the process (Nakicenovic et al., 2019). It can be inferred from Figure 2 as the three interconnected pillars are seated in the universality of ‘Governing’ and ‘Digitalization’ set that digitalization is important in achieving sustainable development.
5 On a quick note, it is rationally envisaged that digital technologies accelerate and promote sustainable development achievement, while sustainable development attainment promotes digital technologies. The two concepts have bidirectional causality when rationally is considered. Many studies, which had considered pre- and post- statistics of digital diffusion in national productivity, have given credence to the fact that the two concepts supplement each other (Baxtiyarjon and Jurayevich 2020; Sharma 2019).
6
image1

7 Figure 1: Three Pillars of Sustainable Development. Source: Lamprinaki Viktoria-Vasiliki (2015)
8
image2

9 Figure 2: Interconnectivity of Sustainability Pillars with the Universality of Governing and Digitalisation. Source: Stone (2017) and Thwink (2014)
10

2. Paradigm Shift in Achieving Sustainable Development in the Face of Digital Technologies
11 Digital technologies have challenged and changed the know-how of handling our daily activities in achieving economic progress. The changes are observed in education, health, agriculture, finance, business undertaking and governance. Now we are having ‘E’ prefix on almost everything we do. It is now E-banking, E-Commerce, E-Health, E-Agriculture, E-Education, E-Governance, just to mention a few. Our activities are now preceded by ‘E-’ prefix, which implies ‘Electronic’, that is, digital technology. Electronic forms are more preferable to the traditional form of activities, as they save time, costs, enhance profitability and productivity, and drive inclusion above all. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Big data, Cloud computing, Machine learning and Algorithmic are relevant and significant tools in realising the Sustainable Development (UNCTAD 2019). Vividly, digital technologies have ways of expediting action towards the achievement of sustainable development.

всего просмотров: 478

Оценка читателей: голосов 0 

1. Baxtiyarjon, Bulturbayevich, M., and Baxriddin Jurayevich, M. 2020. Impact of the Digital Economy on the Economic Growth. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education 01(01): 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015904033 
2. Daño, Neth, Kathy Jo Wetter and Silvia Ribeiro. 2012. Addressing the ‘Technology Divides’: Critical Issues in Technology and SDGs.
3. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/4673dano.pdf 
4. Demirgüç-Kunt Asli, Leora Klapper, Dorothe Singer, Saniya Ansar and Jake Hess. 2018. The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0 
5. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Rwanda. 2019. What is digitalization? https://Innolytics-Innovation.Com/.  Retrieved from https://innolytics-innovation.com/what-is-digitalization/ 
6. Jovanović, Milica, Jasmina Dlačić and Milan Okanović. 2018. Digitalization and society’s sustainable development – Measures and implications. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet Au Rijeci 36(2): 905–928. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2018.2.905 
7. Lamprinaki, Viktoria-Vasiliki. 2015. Introduction to Sustainable Development. A brief handbook for students by students. https://www.ihu.edu.gr/icsd/docs/introduction-to-sustainable-development.pdf 
8. Ledgerwood, Joanna. 1998. Microfinance Handbook: An Institutional and Financial Perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/12383 
9. McWaters, Jesse. 2015. The Future of Financial Services: How Disruptive Innovations Are Reshaping the Way Financial Services Are Structured, Provisioned and Consumed. World Economic Forum.
10. Navaratnam, Anojan, Haidar Abdul-Muhsin and Mitchell Humphreys. 2018. Updates in urologic robot assisted surgery. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15480.1. 
11. Noor, Nadav, Assaf Shapira, Reuven Edri, Idan Gal, Lior Wertheim and Tal Dvir. 2019. 3D printing of personalized thick and perfusable cardiac patches and hearts. Advanced Science 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201900344. 
12. Reiff, Nathan. 2020, November 25. Hom Much of All Money Is in Bitcoin? https://www.investopedia.com/tech/how-much-worlds-money-bitcoin/ 
13. Stone, Alexa 2017, October 1. These 17 goals have a Triple Bottom Line. https://ecopreserve.net/sdg/ 
14. Strohmaier, Rita, Marlies Schuetz and Simone Vannuccini. 2019. A systemic perspective on socioeconomic transformation in the digital age. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics 46: 361-378.
15. Thwink. 2014. The Three Pillars of Sustainability. https://www.thwink.org/sustain/glossary/ThreePillarsOfSustainability.htm 
16. Townsend, Peter. 2014. The International Analysis of Poverty. London: Routledge.
17. World Bank. 2016. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
18. World Poverty Clock. (2020, November 25). World Poverty Clock: Poverty Relative to the World. Retrieved from World Poverty Clock. https://worldpoverty.io/headline 
19. Zharova, Anna, and Ian Lloyd. 2018. An examination of the experience of cryptocurrency use in Russia. In search of better practice. Computer Law & Security Review 34: 1300 - 1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.09.00.

Система Orphus

Загрузка...
Вверх