Immersion in the Concrete (On Dialectics and Its Interpretation by A. A. Zinoviev)

In correlation with the position of A. A. Zinoviev, the peculiarities of dialectics are discussed. The focus is on the philosophical nature of dialectics, its inherent interrelation of the abstract and the concrete, as well as the specificity of dialectical contradiction. The author’s reasoning is built around several pivotal statements. Science can do without dialectics; but philosophy cannot do without dialectics. Dialectical thought does not ascend from the abstract to the concrete, but immerses in the concrete. Dialectical contradiction arises between meanings that are close to the opposite ones, but are not strictly opposite. It is reasonable to distinguish between dialectics of process and dialectics of state and to insist on the irreducibility to the first dialectical paradigm as such. Dialectics is not only a theory and methodology, but, above all, a style.

Keywords

dialectics, philosophical nature of dialectics, the abstract and the concrete, dialectical contradiction, formal logical contradiction, A. A. Zinoviev

Received

14.03.2023

Publication date

30.06.2023

Number of characters

28622

Cite

GOST	Fatenkov A. Immersion in the Concrete (On Dialectics and Its Interpretation by A. A. Zinoviev) // ISTORIYA – 2023. – V. 14. – Issue 4 (126) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840026305-4-1 (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840026305-4
MLA	Fatenkov, Aleksey N "Immersion in the Concrete (On Dialectics and Its Interpretation by A. A. Zinoviev)." ISTORIYA 14.4 (126) (2023) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840026305-4
APA	Fatenkov A. (2023). Immersion in the Concrete (On Dialectics and Its Interpretation by A. A. Zinoviev). ISTORIYA 14(4 (126)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840026305-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 69

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gegel' G. V. F. Sistema nauk. Ch. I. Fenomenologiya dukha / per. s nem. G. Shpeta. SPb.: Nauka, 2002.

2. Zinov'ev A. A. Voskhozhdenie ot abstraktnogo k konkretnomu (na materiale «Kapitala» K. Marksa). M.: IF RAN, 2002.

3. Zinov'ev A. A. Faktor ponimaniya. M.: Algoritm, Ehksmo, 2006.

4. Il'enkov Eh. V. Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo // Il'enkov Eh. V. Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Politizdat, 1991. S. 276—293.

5. Lifshits Mikh. Chto takoe klassika? Ontognoseologiya. Smysl mira. «Istinnaya seredina». M.: Iskusstvo XXI vek, 2004.

6. Popper K. R. Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya: Rost nauchnogo znaniya / per. s angl. A. L. Nikiforova, G. A. Novichkovoj. M.: AST, Ermak, 2004.

7. Fatenkov A. N. Nevozvraschenets: figura sub'ekta v negativnoj dialektike // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. № 6. S. 159—169.

8. Fatenkov A. N. Yazyki filosofii, literatury i nauki v aspekte smysla // Filosofskie nauki. 2003. № 9. S. 68—87.