Antiochos I, the Rēš Temple and Hellenistic Uruk: Commentary on YOS 20. 87

 
PIIS207987840024623-4-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840024623-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
Institute of Oriental Studies RAS
Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article concerns with the Late Babylonian text YOS 20. 87 which contains valuable information on the building of the Rēš Temple in Early Seleukid Uruk. The chronology of the text covers the period from 290 to 275 B. C. that corresponds to the time of Antiochos I’s coregency and the first years of his sovereign reign. There was a number of “instructions” (ṭēmu) regarding the building of Bīt Rēš, one of them seems to be the letter of Antiochos himself. The king apparently supported this initiative although he most likely did not personally participate in it. The mention of Queen Apama, mother of Antiochos and the first wife of Seleukos I, in YOS 20. 87 indicates that c. 290 B. C. she was probably alive and together with her son contributed to the building the Rēš Temple. Kidin-Anu, the āšipu priest of Anu, can be identified with the chief priest (šešgallu) of Bīt Rēš known from several Late Babylonian ritual texts. The evidence finds a parallel in so-called Uruk prophecy which may also contain allusions to the first Seleukids. All these sources provide an important evidence on the early stage of the history of the Rēš Temple. It also demonstrates that royal patronage of the first Seleukids (especially Antiochos I) was not limited only to Babylon and Borsippa.

KeywordsHellenistic Babylonia, Hellenistic Near East, the Seleukids, Uruk, Bīt Rēš
Received18.09.2022
Publication date15.03.2023
Number of characters48258
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 312

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Berzon E. M. Deyatel'nost' i polnomochiya sopravitelya tsarya v Selevkidskoj Vavilonii: primer Antiokha I // Vostok (Oriens). 2020. № 3. S. 51—64.

2. Baker H. D. Beneath the Stairs in the Rēš Temple of Hellenistic Uruk. A Study in Cultic Topography and Spatial Organization // ZOrA. 2013. Bd. 6. P. 18—42.

3. Beaulieu P. -A. Nabû and Apollo: The Two Faces of Seleucid Religious Policy // Orient und Okzident in hellenistischer Zeit. Beiträge zur Tagung “Orient und Okzident — Antagonismus oder Konstrukt? Machtstrukturen, Ideologien und Kulturtransfer in hellenistischer Zeit”, Würzburg. 10—13 April 2008 / hrsg. Hoffmann F., Schmidt K. S. Vaterstetten, 2014. P. 13—30.

4. Beaulieu P. -A. The Historical Background of the Uruk Prophecy // The Tablet and the Scroll: Near Eastern Studies in Honor of William W. Hallo / ed. Cohen M. E., Snell D. C., Weisberg D. B. Bethesda, 1993. P. 41—52.

5. Boiy T. Late Achaemenid and Hellenistic Babylon. Leuven, 2004.

6. Boiy T. Temple Building in Hellenistic Babylonia // From the Foundations to the Crenellations. Essays on Temple Building in the Ancient Near East and Hebrew Bible / ed. Boda M. J., Novotny J. Münster, 2010. P. 211—219.

7. Boiy T. TU 38, Its Scribe and His Family // RA. 2010. Vol. 104. P. 169—178.

8. Cohen G. The Hellenistic Settlements in the East from Armenia and Mesopotamia to Bactria and India. Berkeley; Los Angeles; L., 2013.

9. Doty L. T. Cuneiform Documents from Hellenistic Uruk / ed. Wallenfels R. Yale Oriental Series, Babylonian Texts. Vol. 20. New Haven; L., 2012.

10. Engels D., Erickson K. Apama and Stratonike — Marriage and Legitimacy // Seleukid Royal Women: Creation, Representation and Distortion of Hellenistic Queenship in the Seleukid Empire / ed. Coşkun A., McAuley A. Stuttgart, 2016. P. 39—65.

11. Erickson K. G. Apollo-Nabû: The Babylonian Policy of Antiochus I // Seleucid Dissolution: The Sinking of the Anchor / ed. Erickson K., Ramsey G. Wiesbaden, 2011. P. 51—65.

12. Falkenstein A. Topographie von Uruk. I. Teil: Uruk zur Seleukidenzeit. Leipzig, 1941.

13. George A. R. House Most High: The Temples of Ancient Mesopotamia. Winona Lake, 1993.

14. Goldstein J. A. The Historical Setting of the Uruk Prophecy // JNES. 1988. Vol. 47. P. 43—46.

15. Hackl J. Bemerkungen zur Chronologie der Seleukidenzeit: Die Koregentschaft von Seleukos I. Nikator und Antiochos (I. Soter) // Klio. 2020. Bd. 102. No. 2. S. 560—578.

16. Hackl J. Late Babylonian // History of the Akkadian Language / ed. Vita J. -P. Vol. 2. Leiden; Boston, 2021. P. 1431—1458.

17. Held W. Seleukidische Tempel babylonischen Typs // Marburger Winckelmann-Programm 2014 / hrsg. Amedick R. Marburg, 2014. S. 143—162.

18. Hellenistic Babylonia: Texts, Images and Names. University of California, Berkeley. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/hbtin/ (data obrascheniya: 27.08.2022).

19. Hunger H., Kaufman St. A. A New Akkadian Prophecy Text // JAOS. 1975. Vol. 95. No. 3. P. 371—375.

20. Kose A. Uruk. Architektur IV. Von der Seleukiden — bis zur Sasanidenzeit. Ausgrabungen in Uruk-Warka: Endberichte / hrsg. Boehmer R. M. Bd. 17. Mainz am Rhein, 1998.

21. Krul J. The Revival of the Anu Cult and the Nocturnal Fire Ceremony at Late Babylonian Uruk. Leiden; Boston, 2018.

22. Lambert W. G. The Background of Jewish Apocalyptic. The Ethel M. Wood Lecture delivered before the University of London on 22 February 1977. L., 1978.

23. Linssen M. The Cults of Uruk and Babylon. The Temple Ritual Texts as Evidence for Hellenistic Cult Practice. Leiden; Boston, 2004.

24. McEwan G. Priest and Temple in Hellenistic Babylonia. Wiesbaden, 1981.

25. Monerie J. D’Alexandre à Zoilos. Dictionnaire prosopographique des porteurs de nom grec dans les sources cunéiformes. Stuttgart, 2014.

26. PHI Greek Inscriptions. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://epigraphy.packhum.org/ (data obrascheniya: 27.08.2022).

27. Robson E. Seleucid Building Inscription Online [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/cams/selbi/corpus (data obrascheniya: 27.08.2022).

28. Robson E. Who Wrote the Babylonian Astronomical Diaries? // Keeping Watch in Babylon: The Astronomical Diaries in Context / ed. Haubold J., Steele J., Stevens K. Leiden; Boston, 2019. P. 120—153.

29. Sherwin-White S. Aspects of Seleucid Royal Ideology: The Cylinder of Antiochus I from Borsippa // JHS. 1991. Vol. 111. P. 71—86.

30. Stevens K. Between Greece and Babylonia: Hellenistic Intellectual History in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cambridge, 2019.

31. Van der Spek R. J. Grondbezit in het Seleucidische rijk. Amsterdam, 1986.

32. Van der Spek R. J. The Babylonian Temple during the Macedonian and Parthian Domination // BiOr. 1985. Vol. 42. No. 5/6. P. 542—562.

33. Van der Spek R. J. The Size and Significance of the Babylonian Temples under Successors // La transition entre l’empire achéménide et les royaumes hellénistiques (vers 350—300 av. J. C.). Actes du colloque organisé au Collège de France par la “Chaire d’histoire et civilisation du monde achéménide et de l’empire d’Alexandre” et le “Réseau international d’études et de recherches achéménides” (GDR 2538 CNRS), 22—23 novembre 2004 / ed. Briant P., Joannès F. P., 2006. P. 261—307.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up