The Council of Mutual Economic Assistance and UNIDO: in Search of a Bright Industrial Future

 
PIIS207987840022775-1-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840022775-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

On the basis of COMECON archive stored in Moscow the author for the first time analyzes mechanism of common decision making among socialist countries regarding UNIDO — the UN body in charge of industrial development in 1970s — 1980s. The article is in a scientific first to represent the story of the Permanent Working Group (PRG) of the COMECON Executive Committee as a special body responsible for working out of collective politics in UNIDO. For the first time the reader can grasp the concept of World economic security which had been worked out and promoted in UN structures by the COMECON member states in the second half of 1980s. On the basis of the PRG materials author comes to the conclusion that the International economic security concept had been seen by socialist states as “elastic mutually acceptable compromise” — part and parcel of the New world economic order, promoted by the Third World countries in 1980s. The author believes that “new thinking” in international economic relations which caused the appearance of the International economic security, strategy of COMECON in UNIDO and other program documents was the idealistic attempt to build the failed socialist project of globalization of which one heard in various publications about alternative scenarios of more fair world order, yet without analysis of key strategic documents of 1980s before. The nowday search of a new model of global development invite the readers to throw a new light at the theoretical baggage of 1980s and allow us to come to new conclusions about the rise and fall of collective actions by COMECON members at the world stage. 

KeywordsCOMECON, UNIDO, USSR, world system of socialism, New economic world order, UN, USSR, globalization, world order, international economic security, comprehensive international security system, alternative globalization, Third World, industrialization, development
Received20.07.2022
Publication date15.12.2022
Number of characters35825
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 188

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Lipkin M. A. i dr. «Sovetskij globalizm: teoriya i praktika mirovoj sistemy sotsializma v 1950-kh — 1970-kh gg.»: kruglyj stol v Institute vseobschej istorii RAN // Novejshaya istoriya Rossii / Modern History of Russia. 2017. № 4.

2. Lipkin M. A. Sovet Ehkonomicheskoj Vzaimopomoschi: istoricheskij opyt al'ternativnogo global'nogo miroustrojstva (1949—1979). M.: Ves' Mir. 2019.

3. Yablokov B. Establishing of UNCTAD in 1964 and the Logic of the Cold War: Economic Diplomacy of the GDR in the Struggle for International Recognition // ISTORIYA. 2022. Vol. 13. Is. 10 (120). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840017647-0-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840017647-0

4. Christian M. Der Nord-Süd-Konflikt und die “neue internationale Arbeitsteilung” in den 1970er Jahren: UNIDO, UNCTAD und die Vorgeschichte unserer “Globalisierung” // Nord/Süd. Perspektiven auf eine globale Konstellation / ed. Fiebrig S., Dinkel J., Reichherzer F. De Grueyter Oldenburg. 2020.

5. Garavini G. After Empires. European integration. Decolonization and the challenge from the Global South. 1957—1986. Oxfor University Press, 2012.

6. Mark J., Betts P. Socialism goes global. The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Age of Decolonization. Oxford University Press, 2022.

7. Mark J., Kalinovsky M., Marung S. Alternative Globalizations. Eastern Europe and the Postcolonial World. Indiana University Press, 2020.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up