Franco-Soviet SECAM: from Ambitious Plans to Reality (Based on the Materials of the French Foreign Ministry Archives)

 
PIIS207987840017637-9-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840017637-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article, based on the materials of the archives of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, most of which have not yet been introduced into scientific circulation, examines the Soviet-French attempt to create a single color television standard for the whole of Europe on the basis of SECAM. It was the cooperation in the field of color television, according to the plan of Moscow and Paris, that was supposed to confirm that two countries from different military-political blocs could implement an ambitious project in the field of high technologies. Materials from the archives of the French Foreign Ministry allow us to trace how this project was implemented in practice. The article focuses on the contradictory results of Soviet-French cooperation. On the one hand, SECAM, indeed, for many years became the standard of color television in the USSR, France, Eastern Europe and some other states that were in the zone of influence of Moscow or Paris. On the other hand, the political environment (not all countries were ready to join the Soviet-French project during the Cold War) and the objective limitations of the capabilities of the Soviet and French industry led to the fact that the SECAM project, instead of a single standard for the whole of Europe, became a symbol of artificial politicization ofthe essentially technical issue and showed the limits of Soviet-French cooperation.

KeywordsFrance, USSR, SECAM, color television, détente, Cold War, world socialist system
Received12.10.2021
Publication date05.12.2021
Number of characters34536
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 224

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Lipkin M. A. Vizit Sharlya de Gollya v Sovetskij Soyuz i voprosy vneshnepoliticheskoj strategii Moskvy v 1966—1969 gg. // Quaestio Rossica. 2016. T. 4. № 4. S. 261—274.

2. Osipov E. “Renault” — “Kamaz”: Example of Soviet-French Cooperation in a Period of Detente // ISTORIYA. 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 10 (54). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001736-8-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0001736-8-1

3. Bertho-Lavenir C. La main sur le signal : changement technique et identité collective dans la télévision française (1935—1995) // Le Temps des médias. 2009. № 2 (13). P. 122—140.

4. Fickers A. PAL/SECAM: politique de la Grandeur contre made in Germany // dir. Belot R., Cotte M., Lamard P. La Technologie au risque de l’histoire. Berg international éditeurs. 2000. P. 343—354.

5. Fickers A. Pourquoi ne feraient-ils pas un procès a Telefunken? Georges Pompidou et la promotion du SECAM dans le monde / dir. Griset P. // Georges Pompidou et la modernité: Les tensions de l’innovation. 1962—1974. Bruxelles, 2006. P. 175—195.

6. Rey M.-P. La tentation du rapprochement. France et URSS à l'heure de la détente (1964—1974). P., 1992.

7. Vaisse M. La grandeur. Politique étrangère de général de Gaulle. P., 1998.

8. Vinogradov B. La stratégie de Renault en Russie des années 1960 à nos jours // Revue française d'histoire économique. 2021. № 1 (15). P. 108—121.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up