Constitution and values of the constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm

The article formulates and justifies the methodological understanding of constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm. It considers the theoretical bases of constitutional teleology and constitutional axiology, their correlation in the Russian constitutionalism, identification and polysemy of constitutionalism; universality, plurality and public interest as the values of constitutionalism; teleological norms as constitutional requirements, the correlation of legal and moral values in a large and small circle of constitutionalism. The author used general and specific scientific methods, formal legal, specific historical, comparative legal and complex analysis of legal acts, state-legal and interstate practice, methods of constitutional design and legal hermeneutics for interpreting the normative foundations and prospects for improving Russian constitutionalism in the conditions of formation global constitutionalism. The novelty of the study is to comprehend the polysemy of constitutionalism in the domestic and comparative jurisprudence, to develop the theoretical foundations of constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm.

Keywords

constitutionalism, polysemy, constitutional teleology, axiology, constitutional requirements, constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm, constitution, constitutionality, public interest, stability and dynamism

Acknowledgment

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-011-00761 А.

Publication date

22.12.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Kravets I. Constitution and values of the constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2018. – Issue 12 C. 44-55 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/gp/s207987840001406-5-1-en (circulation date: 23.03.2025). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002199-0
MLA	Kravets, Igor A "Constitution and values of the constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm." Gosudarstvo i pravo 12 (2018):44-55. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002199-0
APA	Kravets I. (2018). Constitution and values of the constitutionalism as a mega-paradigm. Gosudarstvo i pravo (12), pp.44-55 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002199-0

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 2493

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kabyshev V.T. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm na rubezhe tysyacheletij // Pravovedenie. 2001. № 4 (237). S. 61, 62.

2. Kravets I.A. Konstitutsionalizm v sravnitel'nom izuchenii i prepodavanii // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2009. № 6. S. 72–82.

3. Kravets I.A. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm: teoretiko-metodologicheskie i istoricheskie aspekty formirovaniya // Pravo i politika. 2002. № 6. S. 8–15.

4. Kutafin O.E. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm. M., 2008.

5. Schwöbel, Christine E J. Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective. Leiden, Brill, 2011. P. 1.

6. Fassbender B. The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community. Leiden/Boston, 2009. P. 1, 2.

7. Teubner G. Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford, 2012. P. 2, 3.

8. Ehbzeev B.S. Sovremennyj konstitutsionalizm kak sinteticheskoe edinstvo estestvennogo i pozitivnogo prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2015. № 12. S. 5–15.

9. Chistyukhina S. N. Mezhotraslevaya polisemiya v terminologicheskoj sisteme sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka: dis. … kand. filol. nauk. M., 2011.

10. Skrebtsova T.G. Kognitivnaya lingvistika: kurs lektsij. SPb., 2011. S. 8, 9.

11. Phillipson G, Williams A. Horizontal Effect and the Constitutional Constraint // Modern Law Review. 2011. Vol. 74. Issue 6. P. 878–910. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00876

12. Dzhagaryan A.A. Gorizontal'nyj konstitutsionalizm: osnovaniya i perspektivy // Konstitutsionnoe pravo: itogi razvitiya, problemy i perspektivy: sb. materialov Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. / otv. red. S.A. Avak'yan. M., 2017. S. 47–53.

13. Williams B. Horizontal Federalism Inches Along: New Jersey's Experiment in State Constitutionalism and Consent Searches Finally Finds Company // Texas Journal on Civil Liberties & Civil Rights. 2000. Vol. 5. Issue 1. P. 1–26.

14. Oliver D. Common Values and the Public-Private Divide. London, 1999.

15. Jurgens G., Van Ommeren F. The public-private divide in English and Dutch law: a multifunctional and context-dependant divide // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012. V. 71. Issue 1. P. 172–199. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197312000244

16. Raz J. On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries // Constitutionalism. Philosophical Foundations / ed. by A. Larry. Cambridge, 1998. P. 154, 155.

17. Khovard Dik A.E. Konstitutsionalizm // Verkhovenstvo prava: sb. / per. s angl. M., 1992. S. 53.

18. Kravets I.A. Printsipy rossijskogo konstitutsionalizma i konstitutsionalizatsiya pravovogo poryadka. M., 2017. S. 211.

19. Galston W. Pluralist constitutionalism // Social Philosophy and Policy. 2011. Vol. 28, Issue 1. P. 228–241. DOI: 10.1017/S0265052510000117

20. Elkins Z., Ginsburg T., Melton J. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge, 2009.

21. Manasyan A.A. Stabil'nost' konstitutsii kak vazhnejshaya predposylka ukrepleniya konstitutsionalizma v sovremennykh gosudarstvakh // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2013. № 5 (96). S. 21–31.

22. Bondar' N.S. Sudebnyj konstitutsionalizm: postanovka problemy v kontekste roli Konstitutsionnogo Suda v utverzhdenii “zhivogo” rossijskogo konstitutsionalizma. T. 68 // Lex Russica. 2009. № 2. S. 343.

23. Oliver D. Psychological constitutionalism // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2010. Vol. 69, Issue 3. P. 639–675. DOI: 10.1017/S0008197310000838

24. Ackerman B. The Rise of World Constitutionalism // Virginia Law Review 1997. Vol. 83. P. 771.

25. Young E. A. The Trouble with Global Constitutionalism // Texas International Law Journal. 2003. Vol. 38. P. 527.

26. Wiener A., Lang A.F., Tully J., Maduro M.P., Kumm M. Global constitutionalism: Human rights, democracy and the rule of law // Global Constitutionalism. 2012. Vol. 1. Issue 1. P. 1–15.

27. Ehbzeev B.S. Globalizatsiya i stanovlenie transnatsional'nogo konstitutsionalizma // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2017. № 1. S. 5–15.

28. Bondar' N.S. Aksiologiya sudebnogo konstitutsionalizma: konstitutsionnye tsennosti v teorii i praktike konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. Ser. "Bibliotechka sudebnogo konstitutsionalizma". Vyp. 2. M., 2013.

29. Dzhagaryan A.A., Dzhagaryan N.V. Apologiya tsennostnogo podkhoda v konstitutsionnom prave i pravosudii // Yuridicheskij mir. 2014. № 2. S. 27–34.

30. Gadzhiev G.A. Tseli, zadachi i prednaznachenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii (chasti I i II) // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2008. № 1. S. 10–16; № 2. S. 8–11.

31. Petin I.A. Konstitutsionnaya napravlennost' tselej nakazaniya i zadach ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Ross. yustitsiya. 2011. № 8. S. 17–21.

32. Stepanova A.A. Konstitutsionnye tseli i zakonodatel'stvo ob organizatsii gosudarstvennoj vlasti // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2014. № 3. S. 16–19.

33. Dobrynin N.M. O kategorii tselepolaganiya v kontekste konstitutsionalizma // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. № 11. S. 13.

34. Aleshkova I.A., Vlasova T.V. Konstitutsionnoe predpisanie kak pravovaya kategoriya // Tam zhe. 2018. № 6. S. 82.

35. Mitskevich A.V. Akty vysshikh organov Sovetskogo gosudarstva. Yuridicheskaya priroda normativnykh aktov vysshikh organov vlasti i upravleniya SSSR. M., 1967. S. 34.

36. Fedorov M.V. Sravnitel'no-pravovye issledovaniya konstitutsionalizma // Sravnitel'nye issledovaniya pravovykh sistem, pravovykh kul'tur: ucheb. posobie / pod red. M.V. Nemytinoj. M., 2016. S. 188.

37. Nenovski N. Pravo i tsennosti / per. s bolg.; vstup. st. i per. V.M. Safronova; pod red. V.D. Zor'kina. M, 1987. S. 25.

38. Perepelitsa E.V. Poznavatel'nye zadachi i vozmozhnosti konstitutsionnoj aksiologii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 10. S. 11–14.

39. Kravets I.A. Sudebnaya konstitutsionalizatsiya obespecheniya osnovnykh prav i svobod i problema ispolneniya reshenij mezhgosudarstvennogo organa po zaschite prav i svobod cheloveka // Obespechenie prav i svobod cheloveka v sovremennom mire: materialy konf: v 4 ch. Ch. 1. M., 2017. S. 212–216.

40. Arutyunyan A.A. Konstitutsionalizm: problemy postsovetskoj real'nosti. M., 2013. S. 82–90.

41. Strashun B. Konstitutsiya Rossii – sreda obitaniya, trebuyuschaya ratsional'nogo ispol'zovaniya // Konstitutsionnoe pravo. Vostochnoevropejskoe obozrenie. 1999. № 4 (29). S. 145–148.

42. Demidov V.N. Konstitutsiya RF i edinstvo konstitutsionno-pravovogo prostranstva Rossijskoj Federatsii // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2009. № 6. S. 14–23

43. King An. The British Constitution. Oxford, 2007.