Comparative Constitutional Law: new approaches, concepts and categories (All-Russian the “Round Table”)

 
PIIS102694520028732-6-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520028732-6
Publication type Review
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Research Fellow, Department of the Human Rights, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Chief Research Fellow, Department of the Human Rights, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 11
Pages207-215
Abstract

On April 18, 2023 the Institute of State and Law of the RAS hosted the All-Russian the “Round Table” “Comparative Constitutional Law: new approaches, concepts and categories”. It was attended by representatives of leading Russian scientific and educational institutions, as well as researchers from Belarus and Uzbekistan. The “Round Table” examined a wide range of problems related to modern trends in the development of Comparative Constitutional Law, new concepts of constitutionalism, constitutional reforms, synchronous and diachronic comparison of constitutional institutions, comparative research of human rights, the use of comparative methodology in the practice of national and supranational judicial bodies.

KeywordsComparative Constitutional Law, constitutionalism, constitutional reforms, constitutional review, human rights
Received04.07.2023
Publication date04.12.2023
Number of characters42634
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 85

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bodin J. (2021) On Demonomania of Sorcerers. SPb., 2021 (in Russ.)

2. Arnull A. The Many Ages of the Court of Justice of the European Union // New Legal Approaches to Studying the Court of Justice: Revisiting Law in Context / ed. by C. Kilpatrick, J. Scott. Oxford, 2020. P. 12–44.

3. Besselink L.F.M. The Parameters of Constitutional Conflict after Melloni // European Law Review. 2014. Vol. 39. No. 4. P. 531–552.

4. Franklin J.H. Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History. New York, London, 1963.

5. Hotman F. Antitribonian / ed., transl. by H.A. Lloyd. Leiden, Boston, 2021.

6. Kelley D.R. Civil Science in the Renaissance: Jurisprudence in the French Manner // History of European Ideas. 1981. Vol. 2. Iss. 4. P. 261–276.

7. Rasmussen M. Agents of Constitutionalism: The Quest for a Constitutional Breakthrough in European Law, 1945–1964 // Crafting the International Order. Practitioners and Practices of International Law since c. 1800 / ed. by M.M. Payk, K.C. Priemel. Oxford, 2021. P. 249–276.

8. Rasmussen M. Establishing a Constitutional Practice of European Law: The History of the Legal Service of the European Executive, 1952–65 // Contemporary European History. 2012. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 375–397.

9. Siegel N.S., Siegel R.B. Equality Arguments for Abortion Rights // UCLA Law Review Discourse. 2013. Vol. 60. P. 160–170.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up