Perspectives of the application of artificial intelligence in civil legal proceedings: risk assessment and the method of their mitigation

Danielyan, Armen

doi:10.31857/S102694520025215-7

Annotation
References

Perspectives of the application of artificial intelligence in civil legal proceedings: risk assessment and the method of their mitigation

PII

S102694520025215-7-1

DOI

10.31857/S102694520025215-7

Publication type

Article

Status

Approved

Authors

Armen Danielyan

Occupation: Associate Professor of Civil Procedure and International Law department
Affiliation: Kuban State University
Address: Russia, Krasnodar

Abstract

The goal of this study is to explore the current state and prospects for the use of artificial intelligence (Artificial intelligence, AI) in the framework of the administration of justice, in particular, in civil proceedings. In light of constantly changing social relations and the growing need to use modern technologies in various areas of life, including legal ones, it is important to understand what opportunities artificial intelligence can provide to improve legal proceedings and ensure the protection of citizens' rights.

The use of an artificial intelligence system in legal activities has a number of advantages, such as speeding up the decision-making process, increasing the accuracy and objectivity of decisions made, and improving the accessibility of justice. However, it is also necessary to take into account possible disadvantages, for example, the risk of data privacy violations and the possibility of errors in the algorithms, which can lead to an unfair decision.

The final conclusion of the study is that the use of information technology and artificial intelligence systems should not be considered an end in itself but should be introduced as part of a strategy to improve the legal system and increase the effectiveness of the protection and restoration of the rights of subjects of legal relations. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the social and ethical aspects of legal proceedings.

Keywords

artificial intelligence; legal proceedings; e-justice; digitalization; civil litigation; informatization of legal proceedings; artificial intelligence in legal proceedings; digital technologies; digitalization of law.

Received

12.04.2023

Number of characters

17893

GOST	Danielyan A. Perspectives of the application of artificial intelligence in civil legal proceedings: risk assessment and the method of their mitigation // Gosudarstvo i pravo URL: http://ras.jes.su/gp/s102694520025215-7-1-en (circulation date: 28.04.2024).
MLA	Danielyan, Armen "Perspectives of the application of artificial intelligence in civil legal proceedings: risk assessment and the method of their mitigation." Gosudarstvo i pravo DOI: 10.31857/S102694520025215-7
APA	Danielyan A. (). Perspectives of the application of artificial intelligence in civil legal proceedings: risk assessment and the method of their mitigation. Gosudarstvo i pravo DOI: 10.31857/S102694520025215-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Biryukov P.N. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i «predskazannoe pravosudie»: zarubezhnyj opyt // Lex russica. 2019. № 11. S. 79-87. >>>>

2. Biryukov P.N. Tsifrovizatsiya pravosudiya po grazhdanskim delam: opyt ES // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess. 2022. № 2. S. 3-7. >>>>

3. Internet-sud: novyj proekt v dejstvii [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. – URL: >>>> (data obrascheniya: 25.03.2023).

4. Kris'ko V.S. K voprosu o realizatsii printsipa dostupnosti pravosudiya i sozdaniya edinogo informatsionnogo prostranstva sudebnoj sistemy // Administrator suda. 2019. № 1. S. 54-56.

5. Momotov V.V. Iskusstvennyj intellekt v sudoproizvodstve: sostoyanie, perspektivy ispol'zovaniya // Vestnik universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). 2021. № 5. S. 188-191. >>>>

6. Khovard D., Gugger S. Glubokoe obuchenie s fastai i PyTorch: minimum formul, minimum koda, maksimum ehffektivnosti. Spb., 2022. 624 c.

7. Chudinovskaya N.A. Nekotorye napravleniya tsifrovizatsii pravosudiya v Rossii i stranakh Evrosoyuza // Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess. 2022. № 7. S. 7-9. >>>>

8. Bogert E., Schecter A. & Watson R.T. Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult // Science Reports. 2021. № 11. P. 8028-8036. >>>>

9. Godwin J. Position of Artificial Intelligence in Justice System: Justice of the Future [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. – URL: >>>>

10. Heaven W.D. Predictive policing algorithms are racist. They need to be dismantled [Ehlektronnyj resurs] // MIT Technology Review. 2020. № 3.

11. Jones N. AI science search engines expand their reach [Ehlektronnyj resurs] // Nature News. 2016. № 11. >>>>

12. Lee S., Lu X., Reijers Hajo A. The Analysis of Online Event Streams: Predicting the Next Activity for Anomaly Detection // Arxiv. 2022. № 3. P. 1-10.

13. Lim S. Judicial Decision-Making and Explainable Artificial Intelligence // Singapore Academy of Law Journal. 2021. № 33. P. 280-314.

14. Pagano T.P., Loureiro R., Lisboa F., Araujo M., Peixoto R.M., Guimarães G., Cruz G., Santos L., Cruz M., Oliveira E., Winkler I., Nascimento E. Bias and Unfairness in Machine Learning Models: A Systematic Review on Datasets, Tools, Fairness Metrics, and Identification and Mitigation Methods // Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 2023. Vol. 7. № 1. 31 p. >>>>

15. Reiling A. D. Courts and Artificial Intelligence // International Journal for Court Administration. 2020. Vol. 11. № 2. 10 p. >>>>

16. Richardson R., Schultz J., Crawford K. Dirty Data, Bad Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data, Predictive Policing Systems, and Justice // New York University Law Review. 2019. Vol. 94. P. 192-233.

17. Yu Z., Xi X. A Pilot Study on Detecting Unfairness in Human Decisions with Machine Learning Algorithmic Bias Detection // Arxiv. 2021. № 12. P. 1-9.