The evolution of the legal practice of collecting the cost of goods, works, services in the absence of a state (municipal) contract

 
PIIS102694520024245-0-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520024245-0
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Occupation: Assistant of the Department of Administrative and Financial Law of St. Petersburg State University (Faculty of Law)
Affiliation:
St. Petersburg State University
VERSUS.legal
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg, Universitetskaya emb., 7/9
Abstract

The article is a study of judicial practice on the issue of recovery of unjustified enrichment by private entities (suppliers, contractors, performers) from state (municipal) customers in the absence of a concluded state (municipal) contract provided for by the legislation on the contract system.

Keywordscontract system, 44-FZ, state contract, extra works, unjustified enrichment, public needs, public inter-est, balance of public and private interests, state participation in the economy, the principle of efficient use of budget money.
Received18.04.2023
Number of characters43640
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Kikavets V.V. The legal form of financial support for public procurement // State and law. 2022. No. 3. pp. 89-98 (in Russ.).

2. Kovalkova E.Yu. On the issue of recovery of the cost of goods delivered, works performed, services rendered in the absence of a state (municipal) contract // The notes of the Kazan branch of the Russian State University of Justice are studied. 2017. Vol. 13. pp. 192-203 (in Russ.).

3. Scientific and practical commentary on the Federal Law "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services for state and municipal needs" / Pre. editor. I.Y.Artemyev; MGIMO MFA of Russia, FAS of Russia. M.: Statute, 2015. 624 p. (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up