All
 
|
 
 


THE SUBJECT OF LAW AS A FORMALLY-DOGMATIC MODEL OF HUMAN IN LEGAL REALITY: ANTHROPOLOGICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS
 
PIIS102694520023931-5-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520023931-5
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Vadim Pavlov 
Occupation: doctoral student, leading researcher
Affiliation: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, National Center for Legislation and Legal Research of the Republic of Belarus
Address: 220005, Belarus, Minsk, Masherova Prospect, 6, Bersona str., 1a
Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the subject of law as a formal-dogmatic model of a person in legal reality. The process of the doctrinal formation of the subject-legal model is traced, four methodological transitions in the legal view of the subject of law are distinguished. The importance of an anthropological and legal approach to understanding a person and his behavior in modern legal reality is substantiated. The anthropological and legal approach is based on the idea, that law is inherently human phenomenon, the main goal and value of which is the person himself, and not his subject-legal model. In this regard, it is proposed to recognize the official nature of legal-conceptual design in relation to the teachings of a person in law. Despite the fact that the formal-defense method underlies the legal regulation of social relations and the legal means created with its help are a guarantee for a person as the main legal value, nevertheless, it is a person, and not his legal structure, is a central element of legal reality and legal system. To know the anthropological and legal properties of a person and their use in legal regulation, an additional level of legal representation of legal personality in relation to the formal-defendant is proposed.

Keywordssubject of law, human in law, person in law, anthropology of law, human dimensions of law, legal personality, legal status, digitalization of legal personality
Received04.01.2023
Number of characters42550
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register. 
1. REFERENCES
2. Arhipov S.I. The subject of law: Theoretical study. SPb., 2004 (in Russ.).
3. Bratus S.N. Subjects of civil law. M., 1950 (in Russ.).
4. Vedeneev Yu.A. Jurisprudence: Phenomenon and concept. Introduction to the genealogy of the language of conceptual paradigms: monograph. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
5. Vitruk N.V. General theory of the legal status of personality. M., 2008 (in Russ.).
6. Voevodin L.D. The legal status of personality in Russia. M., 1997 (in Russ.).
7. Gadzhiev G.A., Wojnikanis E.A. Can a robot be a subject of law (search for legal norms for regulating a digital economy)? // Law. Journal of Higher School of Economics. 2018. No. 4. P. 24–48 (in Russ.).
8. Gadzhiev G.A. Ontology of law: (critical study of the legal concept of reality). M., 2013 (in Russ.).
9. Gorban V.S. Why is the philosophy of law today? // Theory and practice of social development. 2018. No. 12 (130). P. 99–103 (in Russ.).
10. Dozhdev D.V. Roman private law: a textbook / under the general ed. V.S. Nersesyanz. 3rd ed. M., 2011 (in Russ.).
11. Zhukov V.I. Anthropology in the philosophy of law: setting a problem // State and Law. 2019. No. 3. P. 61–73 (in Russ.).
12. Kelsen G. Pure doctrine of law. 2nd ed. SPb., 2015 (in Russ.).
13. Kovler A.I. Anthropology of law: a textbook for universities. M., 2002 (in Russ.).
14. Kofanov L.L. Priestly colleges in early Rome. To the question of the formation of Roman sacred and public law. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
15. Kofanov L.L. Persona and Persona Publica in the Republic of Rome // Ancient Law. 2010. No. 1 (25). P. 27–50 (in Russ.).
16. Kuchinskij V.A. Personality, freedom, law. M., 1978 (in Russ.).
17. Lapaeva V.V. Libertar-legal dogmatic as a factor in improving the quality and effectiveness of legal regulation // Efficiency of legal regulation: monograph / for general. Ed. A.V. Polyakova, V.V. Denisenko, M.A. Belyaeva. M., 2017. P. 40–69 (in Russ.).
18. “Leon and Konstantin Vernaya Tsarya”: the Old Russian text Eklogs of laws // Schapov Y.N. The Byzantine «Eklog of Laws» in the Russian written tradition. SPb., 2011. P. 13–58 (in Russ.).
19. Lipshitz E.E. Law and court in Byzantium in the 4th–VIII centuries. M., 1976 (in Russ.).
20. Lokk Dz. Two Treaty of Board: Works: in 3 t. M., 1988. P. 135–405 (in Russ.).
21. Matuzov N.I. Legal system and personality. Saratov, 1987 (in Russ.).
22. Mitskevich A.V. Subjects of Soviet law. M., 1962 (in Russ.).
23. Montesk'e Sh.-L. About the spirit of laws. M., 1999 (in Russ.).
24. Narbekov V. Nomokanon of the Patriarch of Constantinople with the interpretation of Valsamon. Part 2. Kazan, 1899 (in Russ.).
25. On the approval of the Foundations of the state policy for the preservation and strengthening of traditional Russian spiritual and moral values: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 809 dated 09.11.2022 // SPS Consultant Plus. 2022 (in Russ.).
26. Ovchinnikov A.I. Legal thinking in the hermeneutic paradigm. Rostov-on-Don, 2002 (in Russ.).
27. Orzih M.F. Personality and law. M., 1975 (in Russ.).
28. Orzih M.F. Law and personality: issues of the theory of legal impact on the identity of a socialist society. Kyiv; Odessa, 1977 (in Russ.).
29. Pavlov A.S. The original Slavic-Russian nomocanon. Kazan, 1869 (in Russ.).
30. Pavlov V.I. Anthropology of law in the context of legal, philosophical and religious traditions: the history of formation. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
31. Pashencev D.A. The subject of law enforcement in a digital society // The subject of law: stability and dynamics of legal status in the context of digitalization: a collection of scientific papers / under the general. Ed. D.A. Pashenсeva, M.V. Zaloilo. M., 2021. P. 58–65 (in Russ.).
32. Pokrovskij I.A. An abstract and specific person in the face of civil law (Prolegomena to the upcoming discussion of the draft obligation) // Bulletin of civil law. SPb., 1913. No. 4. P. 30–50 (in Russ.).
33. Polyakov A.V. Human rights and sovereignty of the state // Post-classical ontology of law: monograph / under the general. Ed. I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2016. P. 305–310 (in Russ.).
34. Ponomareva E.V. The phenomenon of the quasi object of law: theory issues. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
35. Post-classical ontology of law: monograph / under the general. Ed. I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2016 (in Russ.).
36. Puchkov O.A. Anthropological comprehension of law. Ekaterinburg, 1999 (in Russ.).
37. Pyatkov D.V. The positions of domestic civilists by definition of the concept of «individual»: retrospectives and modernity // Izvestia AltSU. Legal sciences. 2018. No. 6 (104). P. 187–191 (in Russ.).
38. Radbruh G. Philosophy of Law. M., 2004 (in Russ.).
39. Social anthropology of the law of modern society: monograph / Ed. I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2006 (in Russ.).
40. Sociocultural anthropology of law: Call. Monograph / Ed. N.A. Isaev, I.L. Chestnov. SPb., 2015 (in Russ.).
41. Spectorskij E.V. The problem of social physics in the XVII century: in 2 t. SPb., 2006. T. 2 (in Russ.).
42. Stepanov S.K. The deconstruction of legal personality or the place of artificial intelligence in the law // Digital Law. 2021. No. 2 (2). P. 14–30 (in Russ.).
43. Strogovich M.S. The main issues of Soviet socialist legality. M., 1966 (in Russ.).
44. The subject of law: stability and dynamics of legal status in the context of digitalization: collection of scientific works / under the general. Ed. D.A. Pashencev, M.V. Zaloilo. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
45. Troyanos S.N. The concept of «economy» in Byzantine law (taking into account modern Greek canonistics) // Theological works. 2012. Issue. 43–44. P. 485–501 (in Russ.).
46. Halfina R.O. General doctrine of legal relationship. M., 1974 (in Russ.).
47. Hvostova K.V. Pronia: Socio-economic and legal problems // Byzantine temporary. 1988. T. 49. P. 13–13 (in Russ.).
48. Cherdanсev A.F. Logical and linguistic phenomena in jurisprudence. M., 2015 (in Russ.).
49. Cheremisinova M.E. Legal status of subjects in virtual space. M., 2020 (in Russ.).
50. Chestnov I.L. Post-classical theory of law. SPb., 2012 (in Russ.).
51. Shershenevich G.F. General theory of law. M., 1910 (in Russ.).
52. Ekloga: Byzantine legislative set of the VIII century / Intr. article, transl. and сomm. E.E. Lipshitz. M., 1965 (in Russ.).
53. Yampolskaya Ts.A. On the subjective rights of Soviet citizens and their guarantees // Issues of Soviet state law. M., 1959. P. 145–226 (in Russ.).
54. Ecloga. Das Gesetzbuch Leons III und Konstantinos' V. Herausgegeben von Ludwig Burgmann. Frankfurt-am-Main, 1983 (in Germ.).
55. Franciosi G. Famiglia e persone in Roma antica : dall'eta arcaica al principato. 3 ed. Torino, 1995 (in Ital.).
56. Norbert R. Anthropologie juridique. 1re ed. Paris, 1988 (in French).
57. Schlag P. The Problem of the Subject // Texas Law Review. 1991. Vol 69. P. 1627–1743.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up