The system of punishments in the People’s Republic of China not related to deprivation of liberty

 
PIIS102694520022771-9-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520022771-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation:  chief researcher of the Center for World Politics and Strategic Analysis
Affiliation: Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation,
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Shanghai University of Political Science and Law of China
Address: Russian Federation
Occupation: associate Professor of the Department of Theory, Methodology and Legal Support of State and Municipal Administration
Affiliation: Institute of Economics and Management of the Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Eltsin
Address: Russian Federation
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 11
Pages165-173
Abstract

The system of applying non-custodial punishments is designed to help reduce the costs of applying a custodial sentence and is a trend of spreading the punishment of offenders by a method unrelated to detention. Correction by measures of public influence and injunction are important types of punishment, which are part of the system of punishments not related to imprisonment in the People’s Republic of China, effectively contributing to the re-education of offenders. Improving the system of correction of offenders through the use of public pressure measures and injunctive relief is of great importance for the implementation of non-custodial punishments.

Keywordsnon-custodial punishment, correction of offenders by measures of public influence, injunction.
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared as part of the work on the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists No. MK-6113.2021.2 on the topic “The state structure of Russia and China: comparative legal research”.
Received31.05.2022
Publication date29.11.2022
Number of characters41507
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 331

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Wang Zendo, Lan Jie, Xu Jungang, Yang Cheng. Comparative study of Chinese and Canadian correctional systems. M., 2012. P. 99 (in Russ.).

2. Di Xiaohua, Liu Zhiwei. Theory and practice of restorative justice in relation to minors. Qiunzong Publishing House, 2019. P. 7, 8 (in Russ.).

3. Kun I. Four issues that should be clearly defined in the legislation on corrections of offenders by public impact measures // Herald of Jiangxi Public Security College. 2010. No. 1. P. 126 (in Russ.).

4. Liu Qiang. Selection and evaluation of the rules for the correction of offenders by public impact measures in different countries [regions]. People’s University of Public Security of China, 2004. P. 1 (in Russ.).

5. Zhao Yunxia, Zhang Huiqing. The study of issues related to the correction of offenders by measures of public influence, within the framework of the concept of restorative justice // Hebei Law. 2019. No. 1. P. 150 (in Russ.).

6. Cheng Weiqiu, Yang Cheng, Yang Yuguan. Collection of UN Human Rights Conventions and criminal justice documents. The Chinese Legal System / ed. by Yang Yiguan. 2000. P. 230, 279 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up