All
 
|
 
 


Rethinking Nuremberg (reflections after reading the monograph by A.N. Savenkov “Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace. Moscow: Prospect, 2021. – 760 pp.”)
 
PIIS102694520022614-6-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520022614-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Konstantin V. Korsakov 
Occupation: Chief researcher, Institute of State and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg
Viktor N. Rudenko
Occupation: Chief researcher, Institute of State and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 10
Pages42-50
Abstract

The article introduces the impressions and reflections of the authors after reading the fundamental monographic study by A.N. Savenkov “Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace”, in which the issues related to the Nuremberg Trial of 1945 - 1946 are deeply studied and analyzed. The book discusses the eternity and the enduring significance of punishment, its role in protecting peace and human civilization, and the progressive significance of the Nuremberg Trial. Attention is drawn to the timeliness and importance of this monograph for the education and upbringing of the younger generation of Russians in the era of socio-political changes and shifts. It is concluded that the verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal clearly and vividly expressed the true essence of criminal punishment and determined a fair and proportionate punishment for criminals who encroached on peace, civilization and immutable universal values and ideals. The authors emphasize that along with historical, social, political, cultural and legal meanings, the Nuremberg Trial had an important psychological significance.

KeywordsNuremberg Trial, International Military Tribunal, condemnation of fascism, International Criminal Law, retribution, justice, punishment, criminal responsibility
Received19.09.2022
Publication date24.11.2022
Number of characters31938
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 275

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Airiyan E.V. A.N. Savenkov. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace. Moscow: Prospect, 2021. – 760 pp. // State and Law. 2022. No. 6. P. 190–191. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520020600-1 (in Russ.).
2. Apresyan R.G. Talion and the golden rule: a critical analysis of conjugate contexts // Questions of Philosophy. 2001. No. 3. P. 72, 83 (in Russ.).
3. Baburin S.N., Golik Yu. V. A.N. Savenkov. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace. Moscow: Prospect, 2021. – 760 pp. // State and Law. 2022. No. 6. P. 185–189. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520020473-1 (in Russ.).
4. Vasilevich G.A., Shidlovsky A.V. Nuremberg – A Verdict for name of Peace // State and Law. 2022. No. 8. P. 63–68. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021576-4 (in Russ.).
5. Gavrilov V.V., Korobeev A.I. Fundamental research of the Nuremberg process. Notes in the margins (article-review of the monograph by A.N. Savenkov “Nuremberg: Verdict for name of Peace. Moscow: Prospect, 2021. – 760 pp.») // State and Law. 2022. No. 4. P. 35–41. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019554-0 (in Russ.).
6. Gracheva Yu. V., Esakov G.A. The Nuremberg Trial and modern Criminal Law (based on the book by A.N. Savenkov “Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace”) // State and Law. 2022. No. 4. P. 42–46. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019555-1 (in Russ.).
7. Davidson Yu. The trial of the Nazis / transl. from English by A. Konoplev, A. Zherebilov. Smolensk, 2001. P. 61 (Peace in wars) (in Russ.).
8. Zhizhilenko A. A. Punishment. Its concept and difference from other law enforcement means. St. Petersburg, 1914. P. 234–236 (in Russ.).
9. Ipatov V.D. A.N. Savenkov. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace // State and Law. 2022. No. 8. P. 69–70. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021577-5 in Russ).
10. Korsakov K.V. Paradigmatic background of the discourse on the absolute and utilitarian in criminal punishment // Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014. Vol. 14. Issue 1. P. 129–130 (in Russ.).
11. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov A.G. Theoretical foundations of international criminal justice in the work “Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace (Moscow: Prospect, 2021. – 760 pp.”) // State and Law. 2022. No. 7. P. 40–45. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021156-2 (in Russ.).
12. Miklashevich P.P. A.N. Savenkov. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace // State and Law. 2022. No. 7. P. 46–48. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021008-9 (in Russ.).
13. The Nuremberg Trial: a collection of materials / ed. by K.P. Gorshenin (ch. ed.) et al. 3rd ed., corr. M., 1955. Vol. 2. P. 982 (in Russ.).
14. Ragimov I.M. Philosophy of crime and punishment. SPb., 2013. P. 5 (in Russ.).
15. Savenkov A.N. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace. M., 2021. P. 20–23, 199 (in Russ.).
16. Tolstoy L.N. On truth, life and behavior. M., 2014. P. 84 (in Russ.).
17. Trainin A.N. Criminal responsibility of the Nazis / ed. by A. Ya. Vyshinsky. M., 1944 (in Russ.).
18. Khomchik V.V. A.N. Savenkov. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace // State and Law. 2022. No. 7. P. 49–51. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021009-0 (in Russ.).
19. Shargorodsky M.D. Punishment under Criminal Law: in 2 vols. Vol. 1: Punishment under the Criminal Law of exploitative society. M., 1957. P. 72 (in Russ.).
20. Shklyarevsky A.N. A.N. Savenkov. Nuremberg: A Verdict for name of Peace // State and Law. 2022. No. 8. P. 71–72. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021579-7 (in Russ.).
21. Sellars K. “Crimes Against Peace” and International Law // Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law. Vol. 97. Cambridge, 2013.
22. Sellars K. Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo // European Journal of International Law. 2010. No. 21. P. 1085–1102.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up