All
 
|
 
 


Sources of specification and interpretation of prescriptions of a special part of Russian criminal law
 
PIIS102694520021767-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520021767-4
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Ruslan G. Aslanyan 
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of Kuban state University
Affiliation: Kuban state University
Address: Russian Federation, Krasnodar
Abstract

The article examines the system of formal sources of criminal law, which in the course of consideration and analysis is thought of as a set of forms of expression of criminally relevant information, differentiated depending on the content of the information, the subjects of its presentation, purpose in the mechanism of criminal law regulation and clearly falling into two related groups: related to the criminal law prohibition in general and to the composition of the crime. As the main conclusion, a system of formal sources of a special part of criminal law is proposed, consisting of two groups of acts: a) regulatory sources, which are represented by sources of establishing a criminal law prohibition (Criminal Code and code of responsibility for criminal acts of a low degree of danger) and sources of specifying the prohibition (resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation and resolutions of the plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation); b) non-normative sources, which are represented by acts of non-binding (doctrinal documents, acts of state bodies not authorized for interpretation, rulings of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation) and mandatory (decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation) interpretation.

Keywordssources of criminal law, criminal law, special part of criminal law, certainty of law, sources of specification of criminal law, sources of interpretation of criminal law, subjects of representation, normative source
Received27.08.2022
Number of characters39462
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register. 
1. Bakhmadov B.D. Klassifikatsiya istochnikov ugolovnogo prava Rossijskoj Federatsii // Pravo i politika. – 2017. – № 4. – S. 34 – 37.
2. Vidergol'd A.I. Pravovye pozitsii Verkhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii i ikh proyavlenie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty): avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Ekaterinburg, 2017. – 30 s.
3. Voplenko N.N. Ofitsial'noe tolkovanie i konkretizatsiya sovetskikh pravovykh norm // Voprosy teorii gosudarstva i prava. – Saratov: Izd. Saratov. un-ta, 1971. – Vyp. 2. – S. 166 – 178.
4. Dantseva T.N. Formal'nye istochniki prava: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Krasnoyarsk, 2007. – 24 s.
5. Dzhura V.V. Pravovye akty organov sudebnoj vlasti: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Omsk, 2009. – 23 s.
6. Ershov V.V. Konkretizatsiya Konstitutsii Rossii: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy // Rossijskoe pravosudie. – 2013. – № 12 (92). – S. 5 – 22.
7. Zhalinskij A.Eh. O sisteme istochnikov ugolovnogo prava // Zhalinskij A.Eh. Izbrannye trudy. V 4 t. T. II. Ugolovnoe pravo / otv. red. O.L. Dubovik. – M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2015. – S. 152 – 167.
8. Zaloilo M.V. Konkretizatsiya i tolkovanie yuridicheskikh norm: problemy sootnosheniya i vzaimodejstviya // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2010. – № 5. – S. 105 – 112.
9. Kajsin D.V. Istochniki ugolovno-pravovoj sistemy Rossijskoj Federatsii: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 2005. – 24 s.
10. Kudryavtsev V.N. Obschaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestuplenij. 2-e izd. – M.: Yurist, 1999. – 301 s.
11. Mad'yarova A.V. Raz'yasneniya Verkhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii v mekhanizme ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya. - SPb.: Yuridicheskij tsentr Press, 2002. – 405 s.
12. Majorova E.I. K voprosu ob istochnikakh ugolovnogo prava // Nauka-rastudent.ru. – 2015. – № 11 (23). URL: >>>> (data obrascheniya: 15.02.2022).
13. Marchenko M.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo i sudejskoe pravo. – M.: Prospekt, 2008. – 510 s.
14. Monakhova L.V. Postanovleniya Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF kak istochnik ugolovnogo prava // marijskij yuridicheskij vestnik. – 2018. – № 2 (25). – S. 39 – 42.
15. Naumov A. Sudebnyj pretsedent kak istochnik ugolovnogo prava // Rossijskaya yustitsiya. – 1994. – № 1. – S. 8 – 11.
16. Naumov A. Yuridicheskaya priroda i znachenie postanovlenij Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF po primeneniyu ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Ugolovnoe pravo. – 2011. – № 2. – S. 59 – 63
17. Naumov A.V. Normy drugikh otraslej prava kak istochnik ugolovnogo prava // Zakonnost'. – 2002. – № 7. – S. 38 – 43.
18. Obrazhiev K.V. Neugolovnye normativnye pravovye akty kak istochniki blanketnoj chasti ugolovno-pravovykh norm // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 99 – 105.
19. Pikurov N.I. Kvalifikatsiya prestuplenij s blanketnymi priznakami sostava. – M.: RAP, 2009. – 288 s.
20. Rarog A.I. Pravovoe znachenie raz'yasnenij Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF // Gosudarstvo i pravo. – 2001. – № 2. – S. 51 – 57.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up