Trends in the combination of individual and collegial in domestic criminal and civil, arbitration, administrative proceedings

 
PIIS102694520021334-8-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520021334-8
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Institute of Law, Ufa University of Science and Technology
Affiliation: Ufa University of Science and Technology
Address: Ufa, 32, Z.Validi st.
Abstract

All types of modern litigation are characterized by a combination of individual and collegial principles. The commonality of the concept of justice determines the conceptual universality of most institutions of criminal, arbitration, civil and administrative proceedings. It follows from this that the criteria and principles for determining the ratio of collegial and individual are or should be approximately the same in all types of processes. Recent years have been marked by an active reform of the rules on the composition of the court in these types of justice, but the novelties are not always uniform or at least coordinated.

The author attempts to identify the patterns of formation of the sole or collegial composition of the court within certain types of legal proceedings and justice in general. The tendencies of modern procedural law in determining the ratio of individual and collegial in the courts of the first, appellate and cassation instances are analyzed separately.

Keywordscriminal proceedings, civil proceedings, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, individual, collegial, justice, composition of the court
Received07.01.2023
Number of characters35998
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Alieskerov M.A. Collegial and individual consideration of civil cases in the courts of second instance // Arbitration and civil procedure. 2008. No. 9. pp. 33-36.

2. Vereshchagin A.N. On the origin of the Russian judicial system and its prospects // Law. 2019. No. 4. pp. 54-66.

3. Gamidova E.G. Consideration of administrative cases by way of appeal under the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation // Leningrad Law Journal. 2016. No. 4. pp. 187-198.

4. Gizatullin I. A. Procedural independence of judges: the essence and problems of ensuring // Russian Journal of Legal Studies. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 1. pp. 105-115.

5. Golovko L.V. The State and its criminal proceedings. M., 2022. 459 p.

6. Guskova A.P., Sokolova N.G. On controversial issues of the implementation of the right of the accused to the consideration of a criminal case by a court with the participation of jurors // Russian judge. 2008. No. 2. pp. 16-18.

7. Demichev A.A., Ilyukhina V.A. On some debatable problems of the principles of the civil process in Russia (analogy of law and analogy of law, combination of individual and collegial principles in legal proceedings) // Arbitration and civil procedure. 2020. No. 7. Access from the SPS "ConsultantPlus".

8. Dikarev I.S. Questions of jurisdiction of criminal cases to military courts // Law in the Armed Forces. 2020. No. 6. pp. 63-68.

9. Kartsevskaya O.I. Correlation of individual and collegial principles in the administration of justice in the history of Russia // Bulletin of the Vladimir Law Institute. 2021. No. 1. pp. 150-158.

10. Materov N.V. Appeal – alone! // EZH-Yurist. 2010. No. 34. p. 5.

11. Panokin A.M. The system of reviewing decisions of magistrates in criminal cases within the framework of the model of autonomization of world justice // Magistrate. 2016. No. 3. pp. 19-23.

12. Tarasov A.A. Individual and collective in criminal proceedings: legal and socio-psychological problems. Samara, 2001. 312 p.

13. Terekhova L.A. The system of judicial review in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation // Bulletin of Civil Procedure. 2012. No. 3. pp. 29-51.

14. Trofimova M.S. Individual or collegial appeal: arguments "for" and "against" // Bulletin of the Novgorod University. 2012. No. 69. pp. 97-100.

15. Shchepalov S.V. Appeal in civil proceedings: on the question of the composition of the court // Russian Justice. 2009. No. 6. Access from the SPS "ConsultantPlus".

16. Cross F.B., Tiller E.H. Understanding collegiality in court // Journal of Constitutional Law of the University of Pennsylvania. 2008. pp. 257-271.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up