Punishability of crimes committed using virtual currency

 
PIIS0021176-3-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520021176-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Prosecutor of the Main Criminal-Judicial Department, Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation
Affiliation: Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 4
Pages192-196
Abstract

Innovations in the field of computer technology and financial assets affect all spheres of life of society and the state, including its law enforcement and judicial bodies. New types of encroachments, which include crimes committed using virtual currency or in relation to it, which certainly have an increased public danger, often go unpunished due to the lack of regulatory regulation and uniform judicial practice. The greatest risks from the lack of effective criminal legal counteraction to these crimes are borne by society, since the absence of punishment, as the final stage of the mechanism for bringing to criminal responsibility for illegal violations, negates the efforts of law enforcement agencies faced with the impossibility of bringing to such responsibility the perpetrators. To overcome these contradictions and before the adoption of legislative measures, appropriate explanations of the Plenum Supreme Court of the Russian Federation are necessary, since the judiciary should not assume the powers of the legislature and form the directions of the criminal policy of the state.

Keywordsvirtual currency, cryptocurrency, digital currency, bitcoin, digital financial assets, virtual assets, criminality of crimes, criminal liability for theft of cryptocurrencies, criminality and criminality of cryptocurrency turnover, cryptocrime
Received17.07.2022
Publication date28.04.2023
Number of characters23001
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 160

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bibik O.N. Nakazuemost' kak priznak prestupleniya // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya «Pravo». 2008. № 2 (15). S. 123-126.

2. Durmanov N.D. Ponyatie prestupleniya. M.,1948. – 311 s.

3. Kalmykov P.D. Uchebnik ugolovnogo prava, sostavlennyj po lektsiyam professora P.D. Kalmykova A. Lyubavskim: chasti: obsch. i osob. – Sankt-Peterburg: tip. t-va «Obschestv. Pol'za», 1866. – XVI, 535 s.

4. Kashepov V.P., Golovanova N.A., Gravina A.A., Koshaeva T.O., Minyazeva T.F., Pechegin D.A., Semykina O.I., Sidorenko Eh.L., Stepanov O.A., Khromova N.V. Kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya kak formy preobrazovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva: monografiya (otv. red. d.yu.n., prof. V.P. Kashepov). - M.: OOO «Yuridicheskaya firma Kontrakt», 2018. – 280 s.

5. Mal'ko A.V., Soldatkina O.L. Prioritety Rossijskoj pravovoj politiki i izmeneniya prava v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2019. №9. S. 5-19

6. Petrushenkov A.N. Sovremennye problemy realizatsii priznaka nakazuemosti prestupleniya v Obschej i Osobennoj chasti Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii // Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve. 2018. №5. S. 137-142.

7. Rarog A.I. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federatsii. Obschaya chast': Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. A.I. Raroga, A.S. Samojlova. M.: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2005. S. 97.

8. Tisen O.N. Osobennosti dokazyvaniya legalizatsii dokhodov, poluchennykh v rezul'tate nezakonnogo oborota narkoticheskikh sredstv i psikhotropnykh veschestv, s ispol'zovaniem kriptovalyut // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2022. №5. S. 60-71.

9. Khabrieva T.Ya., Chernogor N.N. Pravo v usloviyakh tsifrovoj real'nosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2018. №1. S. 85-102.

10. Khilyuta V.V. Prestuplenie i ego priznaki: problemy doktrinal'noj otsenki // Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava. 2021. №3. S. 110-123.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up