All
 
|
 
 


Legal doctrine as a source of law in Russia and Bulgaria: comparative aspects
 
PIIS102694520020994-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520020994-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Anton Vasiliev 
Occupation: Director of the Law Institute
Affiliation: Altai State University
Address: Barnaul, Russia
Simeon Groisman
Occupation: associate Professor of the Department of Theory of the State and Law
Affiliation: Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Address: Bulgaria
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages30-39
Abstract

The article examines the comparative aspects of the use of legal doctrine as the source of law in Russia and Bulgaria. The authors analyze the approaches to determination the place of legal doctrine in the system of sources of law and offer the definition of the “legal doctrine”. Also, the authors highlight the merits of recognizing legal doctrine as the source of law, but emphasize the potential danger of excessive ideologization of the legal system. Authors conclude that it is obligatory to consolidate the legal doctrine as the source of law, defining the conditions for its operation and establishing the place in the hierarchy of sources of law.

Keywordslegal doctrine, sources of law, system of law, ideology, comparative law
AcknowledgmentThe article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Foundation for Scientific Research of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Repub-lic of Bulgaria within the framework of the project 20-511-18002 “Hierarchy and coordination of sources of Law in modern national legal systems of Russia and Bulgaria”.
Received17.03.2022
Publication date25.07.2022
Number of characters32829
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 414

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Boshno S.V. Doctrinal and other non-traditional sources of the form of law // Journal of the Russian law. 2003. No. 1. P. 82–84 (in Russ.).
2. Vinogradov P.G. Essays on the theory. M., 1915. P. 124, 125 (in Russ.).
3. Guy. Institutions / transl. from Latin by F. Dydynsky; ed. by and with an introduction L.L. Kofanov, V.A. Saveliev. M., 1997. P. 17 (Ser. “Patrimonium”) (in Russ.).
4. Granat N.L. Sources of law // Jurist. 1998. No. 9. P. 6 - 12 (in Russ.).
5. Grimm D. On the concept and source of binding legal norms // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1896. P. 26, 27 (in Russ.).
6. David R., Geoffrey-Spinozi K. Basic legal systems of our time. M., 1999. P. 106, 191, 192 (in Russ.).
7. Digests of Justinian / Selected Fragments in translation and with notes by I.S. Peretersky. M., 1984. P. 24 (in Russ.).
8. Dikov L. Course on Bulgarian Civil Law. Vol. I. General part. Sofia, 1940. P. 72, 73.
9. Kalamkaryan R.A. The place of the doctrine of the most qualified specialists in Public Law of various nations in the source base of modern International Law // State and Law. 2006. No. 4. P. 72 (in Russ.).
10. Karagyozova-Finkova M. Constitutional jurisdiction in the new democracy from the European Union. Sofia, 2009. P. 363.
11. Kononov K.A. Ideology as a legal category: theoretical problems // Stability and dynamism of public relations in the Russian Federation: legal aspects: materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference / res. ed. V. Ya. Muzyukin. Barnaul, 2005 (in Russ.).
12. Korkunov N.M. Lectures on the General Theory of Law. SPb., 2004. P. 345, 346 (in Russ.).
13. Lukasheva E.A. Socialist sense of justice and legality. M., 1973. P. 17 (in Russ.).
14. Marchenko M.N. Sources of law: textbook. M., 2005 (in Russ.).
15. Neshataeva T.N. On the issue of the sources of law – judicial precedent and doctrine // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda. 2000. No. 5. P. 110 (in Russ.).
16. Petrazhitsky L.I. The theory of state and law in connection with the theory of morality. SPb., 2000. P. 458 - 460 (in Russ.).
17. Pukhta G.F. Encyclopedia of Law. Anthology of world legal thought: in 5 vols. Vol. III. Europe. America: XVII–XX centuries. M., 1999. P. 282 (in Russ.).
18. Razumovich N.N. Sources and form of law // Sov. State and Law. 1988. No. 3. P. 21 (in Russ.).
19. Ruschev I. Regulate the act – the source for Private Law. Sofia, 2008. P. 46.
20. Sorokin V.V. Legal system of the transition period. M., 2003. P. 334, 449–451 (in Russ.).
21. Syukiyainen L.R. Muslim Law. Questions of theory and practice. M., 1986. P. 65 (In Russ.).
22. Tashev R. The concept of a legal principle // Съвременно право. 2001. No. 6. P. 24–30.
23. Tashev R. General Theory on the Law. Basic legal concepts. Sofia, 2010. P. 114, 115, 149, 150.
24. Torbov Ts. History and Theory on the Law. Sofia, 1992. P. 352, 353.
25. Uolker R. English judicial system. M., 1980. P. 190 - 193 (in Russ.).
26. Khvostov V.M. General Theory of Law. Elementary sketch. M., 1914. P. 107, 108 (in Russ.).
27. Tebbit M. Philosophy of Law. London; New York, 2005. P. 36.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up