Post-law and its socio-psychological portrait

The article verifies the presence of postmodernism and post-law as a product of socio-psychological foundation derived from it. In this regard, the validity of using the state of frustration as a psychological phenomenon to criticize modernity and explain the origin of postmodernity is considered. That is, the underlying excitement that, according to postmodernists, arose as a result of a total crisis and triggered mechanisms for revaluation of values, breaking stereotypes, changing role behavior and abandoning implicit ideas. As a result, it was revealed that disillusionment is artificially used by post-classics to justify the concepts defended. The socio-psychological destabilization occurred not due to the collapse of the ideals of modernity, but due to the immersion of mankind into an unknown virtual-digital environment, the knowledge of which will change society and at the same time return it to a position of equilibrium. However, the postmodern ignores reality, refutes modernity, blames it for the crisis and overthrows the current knowledge of law, biased constructs post-law from anti-values and brings it to life, thereby forming another center of turbulence.

Keywords

postmodern, post-law, post-classics, psychosomatics, simulacrum, crisis, uncertainty

Received

10.01.2022

Publication date

18.05.2022

Number of characters

48685

Cite

GOST	Bochkarev S. Post-law and its socio-psychological portrait // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2022. – Issue 5 C. 20-32 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520018161-8-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520018161-8
MLA	Bochkarev, Sergey A "Post-law and its socio-psychological portrait." Gosudarstvo i pravo 5 (2022):20-32. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520018161-8
APA	Bochkarev S. (2022). Post-law and its socio-psychological portrait. Gosudarstvo i pravo (5), pp.20-32 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520018161-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 492

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseev S.S. The most sacred thing that God has on earth. Immanuel Kant and the problems of law in the modern era. M., 1998. P. 254 (in Russ.).

2. Anderson P. The Origins of postmodernism / transl. from the English by A. Appolonov, ed. by M. Mayatsky. M., 2011. P. 106, 107 (in Russ.).

3. Architecture and Philosophy. Interview with Jacques Derrida. Leningrad – Paris // Conversation. Religious and philosophical journal. 1986. No. 4. P. 120, 121, 136 (in Russ.).

4. Bauman Z. The dispute about postmodernism // Sociological Journal. 1994. No. 4. P. 69 - 80 (in Russ.).

5. Bachilo I.L. State and law of the XXI century. Real and virtual. M., 2012. P. 7 (in Russ.).

6. Bibikhin V.V. Property. The philosophy of the. St. Petersburg, 2012. P. 138 (in Russ.).

7. Baudrillard J. Consumer society. His myths and structures / translated from French, afterword and note by E.A. Samarskaya, M., 2006. P. 64 (in Russ.).

8. Gaidenko P.P. The formation of New European natural science: overcoming the paradoxes of the actu-al infinite // Metaphysics. 2011. No. 1 (1). P. 65 - 87 (in Russ.).

9. Guthrie U.K.C. History of Greek Philosophy6 in 6 vols. I: Early Pre-Socratics and Pythagoreans / transl. from English ed. and with the note of L. Ya. Zhmudya. SPb., 2015. P. 727 (in Russ.).

10. Herder I.G. Selected writings / transl. from German. M.; L., 1959. P. 10, 11, 13, 302 (in Russ.).

11. Goethe I. Faust / transl. B. Pasternak, intro. art. and comm. N. Wilmont. M., 1960 (in Russ.).

12. Gogol N.V. The complete works: in 14 vols. L., 1952. Vol. 13. P. 435 - 446 (in Russ.).

13. Gorban V.S. Qualified reader or interpreter: on the researcher’s attitude to the sources of knowledge of legal and political doctrines // Law and Politics. 2021. No. 9. P. 133–142 (in Russ.).

14. Grechko P.K. Intellectual import, or About peripheral postmodernism // Social Sciences and modernity. 2000. No. 2. P. 166 - 177 (in Russ.).

15. Hugo Grotius. On the law of war and peace: reprint ed. 1956, M., 1994. P. 67, 84 (in Russ.).

16. Damaskin O.V. The state and the law in the conditions of the crisis of modern civilization // Citizen. Elections. Power. 2020. No. 2 (16) (in Russ.).

17. Descartes Rene. Selected works / transl. from French and Latin. M., 1950. P. 369. 428 (in Russ.).

18. Jamison F. Marxism and the interpretation of culture / transl. from English M., Ekaterinburg, 2014. P. 289 (in Russ.).

19. Diltey V. Collected works: in 6 vols. Vol. 1. Introduction to the sciences of the spirit / ed. by A.V. Mikhailov and N.S. Plotnikov; transl. from German ed. by B.C. Malakhov. M., 2000. P. 114, 147, 148 (in Russ.).

20. Dostoevsky F.M. Diary of a writer. 1876. April. Ch. 2. L., 1994 (in Russ.).

21. Dostoevsky F.M. Collected works: in 9 vols. Vol. 9: in 2 books. Book 2: Diary of a writer. M., 2007. P. 107 (in Russ.).

22. Zorkin V.D. The law of force and the power of law: a lecture for participants of the V International. legal forum. St. Petersburg, May 28, 2015 (in Russ.).

23. Liotar Zh.-F. The state of postmodernity / transl. from French N.A. Shmatko. M., 1998. P. 12 (in Russ.).

24. Mazilov V.A. The subject of psychological science and philosophy of psychology // Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: results and prospects of development / ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Koltsova. M., 2017. P. 108-115 (in Russ.).

25. Petrovskaya E.V. Postmodernism // New philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 vols, 2010. Vol. 3. P. 297 (in Russ.).

26. Savenkov A.N. State and law during the crisis of modern civilization. M., 2020 (in Russ.).

27. Toffler E. Futurshok / transl. from English. SPb., 1997. P. 320 - 323 (in Russ.).

28. Toffler E. The Shock of the future / transl. from English. M., 2002 (in Russ.).

29. Frank S.L. Reality and man. Metaphysics of human existence. Paris, 1956. P. 378 (in Russ.).

30. Hassan I. To the concept of postmodernism // Hassan I. Postmodernist turn. 1987 (in Russ.).

31. Chestnov I.L. Legal understanding in the Postmodern era // Jurisprudence. 2002. No. 2 (241). P. 4 (in Russ.).

32. Shene M. Permanent crisis. The growth of the financial aristocracy and the defeat of democracy / transl. from French by M. Mayatsky, A. Shargorodsky; ed. by M. Mayatsky. M., 2017. P. 26 (in Russ.).

33. Shchelkin A.G. Postmodernism – a completed project. Is a renaissance of classics possible? // “Russian Thought” – Historical and methodological seminar in the Russian Academy of Sciences. January 18, 2013 (in Russ.).

34. Bilder R. Rethinking International Human Rights: What Have We Learned, Where are We Going? (Summer 1999). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=909208 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.909208

35. Garrett B. The Myth of the Presumption of Innocence / Texas Law Review. Vol. 94. No. 178. April 29. 2016. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2772661

36. Cottone M. Rethinking Presumed Knowledge of the Law in the Regulatory Age // Tennessee Law Review. Vol. 82. No. 137. Winter 2015. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2584034

37. Jameson F. Marxism and Form. Princeton, 1971. P. 105.

38. Jameson F. Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism // New Left Review. I. No 146. July–August 1984.

39. Kalhan A. Rethinking Immigration Detention / Columbia Law Review Sidebar. Vol. 110. P. 42. July 2010 // Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law Research Paper No. 1556867. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1556867

40. Kingsbury B. The International Legal Order. Oxford University Press, 2003. URL: https: // ssrn.com/abstract=692626 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.692626

41. Misch G. Vorbericht. In: V, LXII.

42. Schanck P. Understanding Postmodern Thought and Its Implications, 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 2505, 2508 (1992).

43. Scott-Hayward C. Rethinking Federal Diversion: The Rise of Specialized Criminal Courts // Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law. 22(2). 47. April 28, 2017. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956021

44. Toscano A. Against Speculation, or, A Critique of the Critique of Critique: A Remark on Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude (After Colletti) // The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism / L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, G. Harman (end.) Melbourne, 2010. P. 87.

45. Weissmann А. Rethinking Criminal Corporate Liability / Indiana Law Journal. Vol. 82. No. 2. Spring 2007. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=979055