All
 
|
 
 


Human rights and ethics in the context of the development of information digital technologies and bioengineering
 
PIIS102694520016729-2-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520016729-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Irina A. Umnova-Konyukhova 
Occupation: Head of the Department of constitutional and legal studies of the Russian state University of justice
Affiliation: Russian State University of Justice
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Irina A. Aleshkova
Occupation: Senior research fellow of the Institute of scientific information on social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of scientific information on social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 9
Pages75-89
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of various scientific positions, understanding, disclosure and forecasting of the development of the institute of human rights in the context of the widespread influence of information digital technologies and bioengineering from the point of view of their conditionality with the requirements of ethics. The authors, generally recognizing the importance of the introduction of new information and bioengineering technologies of the development of civilization, at the same time intend to show not only positive, but also negative consequences of their influence. The main ethical risks for the universal concept of human rights, expressed in the depersonalization of a person as an individual and harming his natural-legal nature, life, dignity, health and freedom, are noted. The paper examines the ethical and legal values of human rights in scientific doctrine and international law, draws attention to the ethical aspects of the development of digital rights and human bio-rights, and notes the relevance of the right to privacy.

Keywordsethics, digitalization, bioengineering, human rights, digital law, bio-law, digital rights, bio-law, ethical and legal values and principles of law, the right to privacy
AcknowledgmentThis article was supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research «Expansion», project number 20-111-50076
Received26.04.2021
Publication date29.09.2021
Number of characters46918
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 841

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Bostrom N. Artificial intelligence. Stages. Threats. Strategies / transl. from English by S. Filina. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

2. To be a person: the interaction of a person and a computer in 2020. Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK, 2008. P. 57 (in Russ.).

3. Varlamova N.V. Digital rights - a new generation of human rights? // Proceedings of the ISL of the RAS. 2019. No. 4. Vol. 14. P. 9 - 46 (in Russ.).

4. Voronin N. Chinese professor announced the birth of genetically modified children. Scientists in anger // News BBS. Russian service. URL: https://www.bbc.com/russian/features-46347487.  26.11.2018 (in Russ.).

5. Voronin N. “This is madness”: the clinic, the university and colleagues disowned the Chinese professor-geneticist // BBC. 2018. 27 Nov. URL: https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-46360329  (in Russ.).

6. Galuzo V.N., Kanafin N.A. Digital Law in the Russian Federation: nonsense or reality? // Law and the state: theory and practice. 2018. No. 8. P. 118 - 125 (in Russ.). 

7. Zorkin V.D. Law against chaos. M., 2019. P. 31 (in Russ.).

8. Zorkin V.D. Providentia or about the law of the future in the era of digitalization // State and Law. 2020. No. 6. P. 7 - 19 (in Russ.).

9. Kamalova G.G. Legal provision of information confidentiality in the digital era: the current state of institutionalization and prospects // State and Law. 2019. No. 6. P. 74 - 83 (in Russ.). 

10. Kleandrov M.I. On the directions of improving the mechanism of judicial power in ensuring the fairness of justice // State and Law. 2021. No. 3. P. 8. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014034-8 (in Russ.).

11. Krotkova N.V. “Round Table”: “Human rights and the strategy of sustainable development” // State and Law. 1998. No. 11. P. 57 - 66 (in Russ.).

12. Kuvyrchenkova T.V. Actual problems of regulation of personal rights and freedoms of a person in the conditions of modernization of the Russian state // Herald of the Tver state University. Ser. “Law”. 2015. No. 2. P. 174 - 185 (in Russ.).

13. Kudryavtsev N. The humanoid robot received the citizenship of Saudi Arabia. URL: https://www.popmech.ru/technologies/news-393732-chelovekopodobnyy-robot-poluchil-grazhdanstvo-saudovskoy-aravii  (accessed: 09.04.2021) (in Russ.).

14. Mal’ko A.V., Afanasyev S.F., Borisova V.F., Krotkova N.V. Review of the methodological seminar on “Digital Law: research methodology” (April 18, 2019, Saratov State Law Academy, Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences) // State and Law. 2019. No. 8. P. 122-128. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006253-0 (in Russ.).

15. Mal’ko A.V., Afanasyev S.F., Borisova V.F., Krotkova N.V. Problems of digitalization in the field of justice // State and Law. 2020. No. 10. P. 151 - 159. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520012242-7 (in Russ.).

16. Moskaleva O. The dangers of digitalization // Housing Law. 2017. No. 10. P. 63 - 72 (in Russ.).

17. Sklyar M.A., Kudryavtseva K.V. Digitalization: main directions, advantages and risks // The economic revival of Russia. 2019. No. 3 (61). P. 106, 107 (in Russ.).

18. Solovykh N.N. The digital economy dictates the need for qualified personnel with new competencies // Russ. investigator. 2018. No. 5. P. 64 - 68 (in Russ.).

19. Stepin V.S. Human rights in the era of globalization and dialogue of cultures // Universal Declaration of Human Rights: universalism and diversity of experiences. M., 2009. P. 8 - 17 (in Russ.).

20. Talapina E.V. Law and digitalization: new challenges and prospects // Journal of Russ. law. 2018. No. 2. P. 5 - 17 (in Russ.).

21. Transformations of human rights in the modern world / res. ed. A.N. Savenkov. M., 2018 (in Russ.).

22. Umnova I.A. Trends and prospects of development of legal systems in the context of the globalization of law // Russian legislation: trends and prospects. M., 2013. P. 77 - 97 (in Russ.).

23. Umnova (Konyukhova) I.A. Constitutional Law and Public International Law: theory and practice of interaction. M., 2016. P. 71 - 89 (in Russ.).

24. Khabrieva T. Ya. Law before the challenges of digital reality // Journal of Russ. law. 2018. No. 9. P. 5 - 16 (in Russ.).

25. Digit and power: digital technologies in public administration / ed. by S.D. Kozlov, O.N. Slobotchikova. M., 2020 (in Russ.).

26. Ashcroft R.E. Could Human Rights Supersede Bioethics? // Human Rights Law Review. 2010. Vol. 10. Issue 4. P. 639–660. 

27. Ashcroft R.E. Euthanasia and the nature of suffering in addiction. Addiction. 2018. Vol. 113. No. 7. P. 1183, 1184. 

28. Ashcroft R.E. Law and the perils of philosophical grafts // Journal of medical ethics. 2018. Vol. 44. No. 1. P. 72. 

29. Bantekas I., University B., Oette L. School of Oriental and African Studies. London, 2016. P. 4-48. 

30. Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. Oxford, 1994.

31. Brokowski C., Adli M. CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool // Journal of Molecular Biology. 2018. Vol. 431. Issue 1. P. 88–101. 

32. Bynum T. Computer and information ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. В: Zalta EN (ed) – 2015). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/ethics-computer/   

33. Carlos J. Cassagne Los nuevos derechos y garantías // Revista de Investigações Constitucionais. 2016. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 59–108. 

34. Casonato C. The Essential Features of 21st Century Biolaw. In: Valdés E., Lecaros J. (eds) Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine. 2019. Vol. 78. P. 347. 

35. Chiarelli B. (ed.) Global Bioethics - the Perspective of Human Survival. Rijeka, 2011. 

36. Eichhorst W., Rinne U. Digital Challenges for the Welfare State. Bonn, Germany Policy Paper. 2017. No. 134. P. 5–9. 

37. Evans J.H. The History and Future of Bioethics: A sociological view. Oxford. 2012.

38. Grear A., Weston B.H. The Betrayal of Human Rights and the Urgency of Universal Corporate Accountability: Reflections on a Post-Kiobel Lawscape // Human Rights Law Review. 2015. No. 15 (1). P. 21–44. 

39. Green R.M. (ed.) Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. New York, 2009. 

40. Joas H. The Sacredness of the Person: A new genealogy of human rights. Georgetown UP, 2013. 

41. Kleinberg J., Ludwig J., Mullainathan S. & Sunstein C.R. Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms // Journal of Legal Analysis. 2018. Vol. 10. P. 113–174. 

42. Miller S., Selgelid M.J. Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2007. Vol. 13. P. 523–580. 

43. Molly K. Land and Jay D. Aronson, New Technologies for Human Rights Law and Practice 2018. Cambridge University Press. 

44. Murphy T., Cuinn G.O. Works in Progress: New Technologies and the European Court of Human Rights // Human Rights Law Review. 2010. No. 10 (4). P. 601–638. 

45. Nordberg A. Cutting edges and weaving threads in the gene editing (Я)evolution: reconciling scientific progress with legal, ethical, and social concerns // Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 2018. P. 35–83. 

46. Ollero A. La invisibilidad del otro. Eutanasia y dignidad humana // Aldaba. 2004. No. 32. P. 139 - 164. 

47. Orts E.W., Anton D.K. & Shelton D. Human Rights, the Environment, and Corporate Accountability // Environmental Protection and Human Rights. 2017. P. 863–976. 

48. Potter V.R. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice‐Hall. 1971. 

49. Qasim Q. (ed.) Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells // Science Translational Medicine. 2017. Vol. 9 (374). P. 1-8.

50. Raso F. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence & Human Rights: Opportunities & Risks // Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Publication. 2018. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3259344  или http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3259344  (accessed: 10.09.2020). 

51. Rogers A., Durand De Bousingen D.D. Bioethics in Europe. Council of Europe Press, 1995. 

52. Sellen A., Rogers Y., Harper R. & Rodden T. Reflecting human values in the digital age // Communications of the ACM. 2009. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 58 - 66. 

53. Sætra H.S. Freedom under the gaze of Big Brother: Preparing the grounds for a liberal defence of privacy in the era of Big Data // Technology in Society. 2019. No. 58. P. 1-7.

54. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. H. (ed.) Global bioethics: the collapse of the consensus. Salem, Massachusetts, 2006. 

55. Valdés E. & Lecaros J.A. (eds.) Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century.: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine. 2019. 

56. Vasak K. Human Rights: A Thirty-Year Struggle: The Sustained Efforts to Give Force of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1977. P. 29–32. 

57. Yao-Huai L. Privacy and data privacy in contemporary China // Ethics and Information Technology. 2005. No. 7. P. 7 - 15. 

58. Zalnieriute M. The Necessity for Binding Human Rights Obligations for Private Actors in the Digital Age: A Submission to the UN Human Rights Council on New and Emerging Technologies. 2019. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19-81. P. 1–6. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3470951 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3470951

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up