Recusal of a judge as a guarantee of his independence in the administration of fair justice

 
PIIS102694520015125-8-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520015125-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of the Department of criminal procedure and criminalistics, Southwest state University
Affiliation: Southwest state University
Address: Russian Federation, Kursk
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 6
Pages114-123
Abstract

The issues of improving the application procedure and consideration of the challenge to the judge, which ensures the independence and impartiality of the judge when considering a criminal case on the merits, are considered. The author emphasizes the importance of the existence of such an institution not only from the point of view of legal requirements, but also moral ones. The article draws attention to the legal novelties introduced in the criminal procedure law in recent years, which exclude the manifestation of interest and subjectivity in the judge, and increase confidence in the judge as the bearer of judicial power.

Keywordsjustice, criminal proceedings, justice, independence, impartiality of the judge, challenges, preliminary hearing
AcknowledgmentThe publication was prepared as part of the state task for 2020 on the topic "Transformation of private and public law in the context of evolving individuals, society and the state" (No. 0851-2020-0033).
Received28.02.2020
Publication date28.06.2021
Number of characters36067
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 532

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Astafyev A. Yu. Procedural guarantees of the effectiveness of justice in criminal cases: problems of theory and practice. M., 2014. P. 89–111 (in Russ.).

2. Vilkova T. Procedural guarantees of the independence of judges in criminal proceedings // Criminal Law. 2014. No. 2. P. 100–106 (in Russ.).

3. Bagautdinov F.N. Actual problems of recusal of a judge in modern conditions // Journal of Russian law. 2009. No. 5. P. 96 (in Russ.).

4. Beznasyuk A.S., Rustamov Kh. U. The judiciary: textbook for universities. M., 2002. P. 51 (in Russ.).

5. Burmagin S.V. The status and activity of the court in the criminal process: textbook. M., 2016. P. 55 - 62 (in Russ.).

6. Gazetdinov N.I. Independence and independence of the judiciary // Russian justice. 2015. No. 12. P. 34 - 37 (in Russ.).

7. Derishev Yu. V., Krasnov V.E. Judge's recusal as a guarantee of fair criminal justice // Herald of the Omsk juridical academies. 2016. No. 4 (33). P. 86, 87 (in Russ.).

8. Karetnikov A.S., Karetnikov S.A. Problems of participation of a judge in the consideration of a criminal case, on which he made decisions in the process of preliminary investigation // Russian judge. 2016. No. 11. P. 56 - 60 (in Russ.).

9. Kleandrov M.I. The judicial community: structure, organizational and legal development. M., 2014. P. 305 (in Russ.).

10. Kokorev L.D. The court in the mechanism of state power // Legal notes. Issue 3: Problems of state power. Voronezh, 1995. P. 62 (in Russ.).

11. Lukaides Lukis G. Fair trial (commentary to paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) // Russian justice. 2004. No. 2. P. 8 - 20 (in Russ.).

12. Naumenkov A.V. Recusal of judges in the arbitration process: dis. ... PhD in Law. M., 2002. P. 25 (in Russ.).

13. Ryabinina T.K. Moral principles of the criminal process: textbook. 2nd ed., reprint. and add. Kursk, 2007. P. 288, 292, 293 (in Russ.).

14. Ryabinina T.K. Preliminary hearing as a means of observing the reasonableness of the term of criminal proceedings // State and Law. 2013. No. 2. P. 55 (in Russ.).

15. Stetsovsky Yu. I. The judiciary: textbook. 2nd ed. M., 2000. P. 85 - 114 (in Russ.).

16. Tetyuev S.V. The possibility of recusal of a judge-a guarantee of impartiality of the composition of the court // Russian justice. 2012. No. 12. P. 43 (in Russ.).

17. Criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation: textbook / ed. by P.A. Lupinskaya, L.A. Voskobitova. 3rd ed., reprint. and additional. M., 2013. P. 199 (in Russ.).

18. Tsypkin A.L. Essays of the Soviet criminal justice. Saratov, 1975. P. 76 (in Russ.).

19. Chebotareva I., Pashutina O., Revina I. The Concept of "Fair Trial": The Ratio of Russian And International Standards // The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences. SCTCMG 2019. Vol. LXXVI, P. 583–589. doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.79.

20. Kozyavin A.A., Chistilina D.O. Criminal proceedings and the civil society’s institutions in Russia: the cooperation system and the social factors influencing its efficiency // SGEM Conference Social science and Arts. Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. 26 August - 1 September, 2015, Albena, Bulguria. P. 529 - 536.

21. Ryabinina T.K. The moral content of legal norms regulating the status of a person in criminal proceedings // International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences. Book 2. Social sciences & arts SGEM 2015 SGEM conference on political sciences, law, finance, economics and tourism. VOLUME: 1 ISBN 978-619-7105-46-9 / ISSN 2367-5659. DOI: 10.5593/sgemsocial2015B21. Section: Political Sciences. Section: Law. Bulgaria, Albena, 2015. P. 753 - 760. 

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up