On subject`s specificity of the non-classic Philosophy of Law: continuing of the dialogue

Occupation: Vice-rector in research and methodological work, Kharkiv`s Institute of management stuff
Affiliation: Kharkiv`s Institute of Management Stuff
Address: Ukraine, Kharkiv

Journal name

Gosudarstvo i pravo

Edition

Isuue 11

Pages

48-54

Abstract

This article is a response to the criticism of Prof. O.V. Martyshin in the journal “State and Law” (2020. No. 12). The author has defended the thesis that there is no doubt as to whether the application of new terminology and philosophical methods of legal reasoning borrowed from contemporary philosophical trends and propagated by the representatives of the non-classical Philosophy of Law has brought positive results in Philosophy of Law and General legal theory.

Keywords

theory of state and law, Philosophy of Law, methodology, non-classical Philosophy of Law, temporal ontology of law

Received

08.04.2021

Publication date

03.12.2021

Number of characters

25689

Cite

GOST	Stovba A. On subject`s specificity of the non-classic Philosophy of Law: continuing of the dialogue // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2021. – Isuue 11 C. 48-54 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520014545-0-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014545-0
MLA	Stovba, Aleksei "On subject`s specificity of the non-classic Philosophy of Law: continuing of the dialogue." Gosudarstvo i pravo 11 (2021):48-54. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014545-0
APA	Stovba A. (2021). On subject`s specificity of the non-classic Philosophy of Law: continuing of the dialogue. Gosudarstvo i pravo (11), pp.48-54 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014545-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 426

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gadzhiev G.A. Ontology of Law. M., 2013 (in Russ.).

2. Kelzen G. Pure doctrine of law: an introduction to the problems of the science of law // Russian Yearbook of the theory of law. 2011. No. 4. P. 434, 436 (in Russ.).

3. Mal’ko A.V. Category “legal life”: problems of formation // State and Law. 2001. No. 5. P. 8 (in Russ.).

4. Martyshin O.V. On the subject and methodological specifics of the philosophy of law and the novelty of non-classical legal understanding: in continuation of the dialogue // State and Law. 2020. No. 12. P. 35 - 44. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520012729-2 (in Russ.)

5. Martyshin O.V. On the features of philosophical and legal methodology // State and Law. 2016. No. 6. P. 20–30 (in Russ.).

6. Permyakov Yu. E. The foundations of law. Samara, 2003 (in Russ.).

7. Stovba A.V. On the peculiarities of philosophical and legal methodology // Pravovedenie. 2017. No. 4. P. 88–101 (in Russ.).

8. Stovba A.V. Temporal ontology of law. SPb., 2017. P. 11, 41, 49, 210, 211, 213, 277, 337 (in Russ.).

9. Heidegger M. Being and time. M., 1997. P. 6, 7, 35, 69, 70, 151 (in Russ.).

10. Fechner E. Rechtsphilosophie. Soziologie und Metaphysik des Rechts. Tuebingen, 1956. S. 261.

11. Maihofer W. Recht und Sein. Prolegomena zu einer Rechtsontologie. Frankfurt am Main, 1954. S. 40.