The doctrine of the revival of post-Soviet Turkmen statehood by Saparmurat Niyazov

 
PIIS102694520014143-8-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520014143-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor of the Department of theory and history of state and law of the faculty of law of the Southern Federal University (SFU)
Affiliation: Southern federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don
Occupation: Vice-Rector for science and innovations, Southwest state University
Affiliation: Southwest state university
Address: Russian Federation, Kursk
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 12
Pages118-126
Abstract

The cultivation of traditionalism in law, based on universal human values and the history of jurisprudence, remains relevant in the post-Soviet space for almost three decades since the destruction of the unified state. At the same time, legal science does not recognize the primacy of the historical school of law, which was revived in the 90s XX century. together with other classical types of legal thinking, after the rejection of the centralism of the materialist theory that prevailed in Soviet jurisprudence. The reason for the attractiveness of traditionalism lies in the inclination towards it of many continental peoples, intensified by the visible consequences of leveling the experience of national legal development in North American and European law, positioning liberal trends, which are largely inappropriate for traditional states, to which Russia belongs, formed as a result of millennial evolution. Among complex nations that have a long experience in the development of statehood and the heterogeneity of the specifics of legal culture, the concepts that fix traditional values in the legal creation as a natural source of human rights, imperatively not connected with the law, which is rational and moral, but by its nature deafened and not necessarily reflects the historical mentality of the society. One example of such concepts aimed at reviving traditional statehood and preserving the integrity of society is the doctrine contained in the twovolume work of the Turkmen statesman Saparmurat Niyazov entitled “Rukhnama”, who tried to translate it into practice. Therefore, the object of the article is public relations associated with the revival of the Turkmen statehood through the formation in the period of a national human rights standard, harmonized with the interests of a traditional society. The subject of the article is a general description, the main content and applied significance of the concept of Saparmurat Niyazov, illustrating the possibility of forming a legal state taking into account traditionalism, as well as the importance of the corresponding doctrine for the development of the legal system of Turkmenistan. The concept of national revival of the republic, formulated by Saparmurat Niyazov, became the basis for the development of a social ideology that influenced the post-Soviet formation of republican legislation, is of scientific interest for other states experiencing the expansion of liberal tendencies in law, not excluding the Russian Federation. In conditions when the international universal security system is showing stagnation, sovereign states are turning to the toolkit of international regional and national means of ensuring security. Therefore, the revenge of traditionalism is predictable, illustrated by the example of Turkmenistan. Moreover, the Russian society, as well as the Turkmen one, shows an inclination towards it, and the construction of a welfare state, declared at the constitutional level, makes it possible to reflect this trend while improving legislation.

Keywordscomparative state studies, traditional state, family of religious law, state and law of Turkmenistan, traditional law, pan-Turkism, Rukhnama, Saparmurat Niyazov, legal, political and religious thought, historical school of law, liberalism and traditionalism in law, family of traditional (customary) law
Received22.03.2021
Publication date21.12.2021
Number of characters27889
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 580

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kravchuk L.D. Ukraine is not Russia. M., 2004 (in Russ.).

2. Lafitsky V.I. Comparative Law in law images. M., 2011. Vol. 2. P. 293 (in Russ.).

3. Levik B. Turkmenistan new permanently neutral country in Central Asia // Skhid. 2013. N°6. P. 218 (in Russ.).

4. Marchenko M.N. Legal systems of today. M., 2009. P. 509–521 (in Russ.).

5. Nebratenko G.G. Public law doctrine of Muammar Gaddafi: a look into the future // State and Law. 2021. No. 2. P. 115 (in Russ.).

6. Niyazov S.A. Rukhnama. Ashgabat, 2002 (in Russ.).

7. Turkmenbashi S.A. Rukhnama. Spiritual greatness of Turkmens. Ashgabat, 2005. The second book (in Russ.).

8. Shatkovskaya T.V. Traditional law in the context of a civilizational approach // Actual problems of Russ. law. 2014. No. 9 (46). P. 1823–1827 (in Russ.).

9. Carnegie Moscow Center (Russia): what does the US agreement with the Taliban mean [Electronic resource]. URL: https://inosmi.ru/politic/20200303/246979749.html (accessed: 06.03.2021) (in Russ.).

Official dialogue between US Special Representative for Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad with Taliban Deputy Chairman Abdullah Baradar (Doha, Qatar. 02/29/2020) (Встреча_США_с_Талибанов_в_Дохе._2020.jpg, 681 Kb) [Download]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up