Positions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on sentencing and execution: analysis of a number of provisions

 
PIIS102694520012735-9-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520012735-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: leading researcher of the sector of Criminal Law, criminal procedure and criminology
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 12
Pages76-84
Abstract

The article presents a critical analysis of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 18, 2018, which amended other resolutions on the practice of assigning criminal penalties and executing sentences. Some General problems that arise when implementing the powers of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to clarify legislation are considered. Other approaches to solving a number of particular problems are justified: failure to set a penalty for the term of application of a measure of procedural coercion in the form of temporary suspension from office; appointment of softer punishment, than is provided by some articles of the Special part of the criminal code of the Russian Federation; definition of malice evasion of the fine imposed as a criminal punishment; the recognition of legitimate reasons of non-payment of fines; replacement of fine some form of punishment and release from punishment; cancellation of conditional condemnation as a result of evasion of the convicted person from liability for damages caused by the crime; etc.

Keywordscriminal proceedings, interpretation of legislative norms, resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, protection of the rights of the victim, the principle of legality, the principle of justice, the principle of separation of powers, deprivation of the right to hold certain positions, replacement of a fine with another type of punishment, maliciousness of evasion from paying a fine, cancellation of a suspended sentence, compensation for damage caused by a crime, independence of judges
Received22.09.2020
Publication date18.12.2020
Number of characters32396
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 612

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Burkov A.L. Status of decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme court in legislation and judicial practice // Jurisprudence. 2011. No. 5. P. 184 (in Russ.).

2. Zadorozhny V.I. Modern problems of compensation for harm to victims of crimes and ways to solve them // Citizen and law. 2006. No. 3. P. 31 - 38 (in Russ.).

3. Ibragimova A.I. Features of the process of compensation for damage caused by crime // Gaps in Russian legislation. 2013. No. 5. P. 208 (in Russ.).

4. Ryzhov A.S. Maliciousness of evasion from paying a fine as the main punishment: questions of theory and practice // Bulletin of the Institute: crime, punishment, correction. 2015. No. 3 (31). P. 25–27 (in Russ.).

5. Skoblikov P.A. Inter-Industry and intra-industry prejudice of sentences and related judicial acts // Law. 2013. No. 8. P. 59 - 65 (in Russ.).

6. Skoblikov P.A. Modern problems of compensation for harm to persons affected by crimes and their legislative solutions // Law. 2012. № 8. P. 87–92 (in Russ.).

7. Skoblikov P.A. Criminal-legal protection of victims of crimes: practical manual. M., 2005 (in Russ.).

8. Stepashin V. Consequences of non-execution of criminal punishment in the form of a fine // Criminal Law. 2010. No. 2. P. 68 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up