"Consensus Justice" in Criminal Cases: Innovations of the Member Nations of the Commonwealth of Independent States

 
PIIS102694520012403-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520012403-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Department of Foreign Constitutional, Administrative, Criminal Law and International Law
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 8
Pages50-58
Abstract

The article announces the vectors of adaptation of mechanisms of private law regulation in Criminal and criminal procedure Law. Within the framework of a comparative approach, the thesis is put forward for discussion on the formation in the jurisdictions of the Member Nations of the Commonwealth of Independent States of a new model of the administration of justice in criminal cases, aimed at reaching a "consensus" between the subjects of public law relations - the defense and prosecution sides - on the "cost" of the crime and the resulting " benefit "from the consequences of "paying" such for a particular party. This model of regulation the conflict, which has a high dispositiveness for Criminal Law and criminal procedure, allows the state (represented by the bodies conducting the criminal process), in exchange for the speedy achievement of the goals of justice and procedural economy, to “propose to the “defendant” of the criminal case (suspect, accused and sometimes defendant) certain advantages. The author considers it possible to apply the definition of “consensus justice” to the model within which “contracts” of a private law nature are concluded, discussed and executed. When submitting the material, the aim was not to highlight the approaches to the corresponding transformations in all, without exception, the jurisdictions of the countries participating in the Commonwealth of Independent States integration association. The author limited the subject of comparative analysis to innovative in time and space mechanisms for regulating "consensus justice", the approbation of which is already provided for by the criminal and (or) criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Moldova and Uzbekistan. The provisions and conclusions accumulated in the article reflect the position of the author, they are not indisputable and can cause discussion.

Keywords“consensus justice”, Criminal Law, criminal procedural law, contract, agreement, concliation, “plea bargaining”, pre-trial cooperation agreement, business persons, Comparative Law
Received27.10.2020
Publication date14.09.2021
Number of characters28646
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 683

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abidov N. Features of the application of Article 69 of the Criminal Code of Kazakhstan in criminal proceedings // Journal "Zanger" (Bulletin of Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan). 2016. No. 11 (184). P. 70, 71 (in Russ.).

2. Avakyan S.A., Kovler A.I., Kenenova I.P., etc. Anti-corruption: constitutional and legal approaches / ed. and the author's hand. col. S.A. Avakyan. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

3. Bernam U. The US legal system. Issue 3 / scientific ed. V.A. Vlasikhin. M., 2006. P. 450, 459 (in Russ.).

4. Bratus S.N. The subject and system of Soviet Civil Law. M., 2005. P. 106, 107 (in Russ.).

5. Galanter M. Justice in different halls: courts, private legal regulation and informal justice / transl. E.S. Bormotova. Source: Galanter M. 1981. Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Privet Ordering, and indigenous Law. J. Legal Pluralism 196 1-47 // Law and law enforcement in the mirror of social science: a reader of modern texts / scientific ed. by E. L. Paneyakh; lit. ed. by A.M. Kadnikova. M., 2014. P. 396, 397 (in Russ.).

6. The Treaty as a legal value / V.R. Avkhadiev, V.S. Astashova, L.V. Andrichenko, etc. M., 2018. P. 357 - 367, 370–380 (in Russ.).

7. Zhalinsky A.E. Criminal law in anticipation of changes: theoretical and instrumental analysis. 2nd ed., reprint. and additional. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

8. Kovler A.I. European Community: institutions of "consensus democracy" // European integration: legal problems. M., 1992. P. 66 - 80 (in Russ.).

9. Neshataeva T.N. Supranationalism: the development of the internal law of the EAEU // Russ. justice. 2019. No. 5. P. 38, 39 (in Russ.).

10. Novitsky I.B. Fundamentals of Roman Civil Law. M., 2007 (in Russ.).

11. New directions of development of the criminal legislation of foreign States: a comparative legal research / ed. N.A. Golovanova, S.P. Kubantsev. M., 2019. P. 126 - 128, 388–393 (in Russ.).

12. Legal protection of victims in foreign countries / ed. by S.P. Kubantsev. M., 2017. P. 208 - 216, 297–300 (in Russ.).

13. Justice in the modern world / ed. by V.M. Lebedev, T. Ya. Khabrieva. 2nd ed., updated and rev. M., 2017. P. 310 - 312 (in Russ.).

14. Semykina O.I. On the question of the constitutional category "justice" in Criminal Law // Constitutional and legal problems of Criminal Law and process: collection of materials of the International Scientific Conference. St. Petersburg, October 30 - 31, 2009 / comp. K.B. Kalinovsky. SPb., 2010. P. 279 - 283 (in Russ.).

15. Semykina O.I. "Deal with justice" in criminal proceedings of the USA and the Russian Federation: comparative legal analysis // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2010. No. 6 (25). P. 146 - 153 (in Russ.).

16. Sidorenko E.L. Dispositive regime of criminal law regulation. M., 2013. P. 199 (in Russ.).

17. Talapina E.V. Law and digitalization: new challenges and prospects // Journal of Russ. law. 2018. No. 2. P. 5 - 17. DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_2_1 (in Russ.).

18. Legal conflict / res. ed. Yu. A. Tikhomirov. M., 2017. P. 191 - 198 (in Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up