Convergence in the procedural branches of law: prospects for judicial law and the criminal process

 
PIIS102694520009986-5-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520009986-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Institute of Law, Bashkir state University
Affiliation: Bashkir State University
Address: Russian Federation, Ufa, 32, Z.Validi st.
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages115-124
Abstract

Differentiation of justice into several sectors, depending on the material and legal features of resolved cases, once became a natural consequence of the historical development of the legal system. However, an analysis of the procedural rules and institutions attributed by the legislator to different procedural branches gives reason to assert that there are much more similarities between different types of judicial activity than is commonly believed, differences do not always have objective grounds, and intersectoral procedural convergence once again updates the idea of judicial law, supported by the author.

Keywordsconvergence, judicial law, criminal procedure, civil procedure, arbitration process, administrative process, justice, quality of justice, procedural law, prejudice
Received04.06.2020
Publication date12.08.2021
Number of characters37552
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 589

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Boltinova O.V. Formation and development of the budget legislation of the Russian Federation // Actual problems of Russ. law. 2015. No. 3. P. 74–82 (in Russ.).

2. Voronov E.N. System and principles of judicial law // Lex russica. 2018. No. 2. P. 67 (in Russ.).

3. Vydrin I.V. About the branch and science of constitutional law of Russia // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2017. No. 5. P. 3 - 8 (in Russ.).

4. Zaichenko E.V. Information technologies and ensuring the rights of participants in civil proceedings // Modern information technologies and law. M., 2019. P. 135 - 156 (in Russ.).

5. Kostogryzov P.I. The concept of justice: philosophical and legal analysis // State and Law. 2019. No. 10. P. 175 - 180 (in Russ.).

6. Krisko V.S. On the implementation of the principle of accessibility of justice and the creation of a unified information space of the judicial system // Court administrator. 2019. No. 1. P. 54 - 56 (in Russ.).

7. Muradyan E.M. Judicial Law (in the context of three procedural codes). M., 2003. P. 30, 31, 44, 106 (in Russ.).

8. Panokin A.M. Unification and harmonization of legal regulation of appellate review of court decisions in civil, administrative and criminal proceedings // State and Law. 2019. No. 10. P. 58 - 67 (in Russ.).

9. Peter Solomon, Jr. Judges should be responsible not for achieving performance indicators, but for the quality of their work // Law. 2019. No. 4. P. 22 - 35 (in Russ.).

10. Pavlushina A.A. Theory of legal process: results, problems and prospects of development / ed. by V.M. Vedyakhin. Samara, 2005 (in Russ.).

11. Pankova O.V. Justice in the Russian Federation: problems of modern legal understanding // State and Law. 2019. No. 4. P. 52 (in Russ.).

12. Polyansky N.N., Strogovich M.S., Savitsky V.M., Melnikov A.A. Problems of the judiciary. M., 1983. P. 18, 19, 36 - 38, 44 (in Russ.).

13. Solov’ev S.A. Favoring protection as a procedural mechanism to ensure equality of arms in criminal proceedings of Russia: abstract ... PhD in Law. M., 2019 (in Russ.).

14. Tarasov A.A. Legal truth – a legal instrument or a subject of speculation? // Legal truth in Criminal Law and procedure: collection of articles of the proceedings of the scientific and practical Conf. 16 - 17 Mar 2018 / ed. by K.B. Kalinovsky and L.A. Zashlyapina. SPb., 2018. P. 197 (in Russ.).

15. Sharipova A.R. The proof in criminal and arbitration proceedings: "unforced" differences // Library criminologist. 2015. No. 4 (21). P. 180 - 185 (in Russ.).

16. Sharipova A.R. Directions of digitalization of criminal proceedings: applicable experience of arbitration process // Library of criminalist. 2018. No. 3. P. 131 - 135 (in Russ.).

17. Shcherba S.P., Chashchina I.V. Prejudice in the criminal process of Russia and foreign countries. M., 2013. P. 96 (in Russ.).

18. Yakushkina E.E. Problems of tax procedural law // Financial Law. 2007. No. 4 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up