All
 
|
 
 


Legal classicism in the United States
 
PIIS013207690009944-0-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690009944-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Leonid G. Berlyavskiy 
Occupation: Professor of Law Faculty, Constitutional and Municipal Law Department of Rostov state University of Economics “RINE”
Affiliation: Rostov state University of Economics “RINE”
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov on Don, B.Sadovaya, 69
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 6
Pages131-142
Abstract

The article investigates legal classicism as a direction of legal science and practice in the United States. The study of the opposition of American law schools expands the understanding of regressive and progressive trends in the development of constitutional doctrine, modern understanding of civil rights and freedoms. Legal classicism (legal fundamentalism) in the United States was based on such principles as full legal protection of property rights, restriction of state interference in market relations in any form, disregard for labor and social law, legal protection of workers' interests and the rights of ethnic and racial minorities.

Keywordslegal classicism, legal fundamentalism, USA, legal science, constitutional doctrine, civil liberties, property right, state intervention
Received07.06.2019
Publication date23.06.2020
Number of characters38103
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 957

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Adygezalova G.E. Sociological jurisprudence of the USA in the XX century: formation of the doctrine, development and improvement of the Rule of Law. SPb., 2012. P. 6, 7 (in Russ.).
2. Arkhipov V.V. Concept of Lon L. Fuller's law. SPb., 2009. P. 3 (in Russ.).
3. Balcerowicz L. Towards a limited state / transl. from English. M., 2007. P. 8 (in Russ.).
4. Berlyavskiy L.G. The U.S. Supreme court during the "New course" F.D. Roosevelt // Russ. judge. 2018. No. 3. P. 47 - 51 (in Russ.).
5. Berlyavskiy L.G. "Conclusion of Brandeis" as an Institute of constitutional procedural law of the USA // Legal herald of the Rostov state Econ. Un-t. 2015. No. 4 (76). P. 23 - 31 (in Russ.).
6. Berlyavskiy L.G. Classification of the theory of constitutional interpretation in the USA // Jurisprudence. 2015. No. 2 (319). P. 64 - 87 (in Russ.).
7. Berlyavskiy L.G. Concept of legal understanding of Oliver W. Holmes (1841 - 1935) // State and Law. 2017. No. 1. P. 80–88 (in Russ.).
8. Berlyavskiy L.G. Louis Brandeis and development of constitutional law of the United States of America. M., 2016. P. 135 - 140 (in Russ.).
9. Berlyavskiy L.G. Legal classicism and legal realism in the U.S. the first half of the XX century // Legal education and science. 2016. No. 4. P. 58 - 62 (in Russ.).
10. Wilson V. State system of the United States. SPb., 1909 (in Russ.).
11. Galeva M. The end of multiculturalism // Culture in the modern world. 2013. No. 4 [Electronic resource] - Access mode: URL: http: //infoculture. rsl. ru (accessed: 29.05.2019) (in Russ.).
12. Grinberg R. Find a way out of the worldview impasse // Academy. Weekly of science and education in the South of Russia. 2013. May 11. P. 4 (in Russ.).
13. US history: in 4 vols. Vol. 1. 1607 - 1877 / ed. N.N. Bolkhovitinov. M., 1983. P. 11; vol. 3. 1918 - 1945 / ed. G.N. Sevostyanov. M., 1985. P. 98 (in Russ.).
14. Klenner G. From the law of nature to the nature of law. M., 1988, P. 10 (in Russ.).
15. The Constitution of the USA: history and modernity / under general supervision A.A. Mishin, E.F. Yazkov. M., 1988. 7, 11, 142, 144, 150, 151, 186, 187 (in Russ.).
16. Lafitskiy V.I. Fundamentals of the constitutional system of the USA. M., 1998. P. 50 (in Russ.).
17. Medushevsky A.N. Theory of constitutional cycles. M., 2005. P. 78 (in Russ.).
18. Nitoburg E.L. Negroes of the USA. XVIII - early XX century. M., 1979. P. 228 (in Russ.).
19. Permyakov V.E. Philosophical foundations of jurisprudence. Samara, 2006. P. 8 (in Russ.).
20. Safonov V.N. Formation and development of socio-economic rights of citizens in the United States: abstract ... Doctor of Law. M., 2007. P. 35 (in Russ.).
21. Sogrin V.V. Political history of the USA. XVII - XX centuries. M., 2001. P. 6, 353, 354 (in Russ.).
22. Friedman L. Introduction to American law. M., 2008. P. 155 (in Russ.).
23. Fukuyama F. Strong state: management and world order in the XXI century / transl. from English. M., 2006. P. 67 (in Russ.).
24. Chernilovsky Z.M. From Marshall to Warren. Essays on the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. M., 1982. P. 3, 66, 87 - 114 (in Russ.).
25. Abraham H.J. Justices and Presidents: A Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court). N.Y., 2001.
26. American constitutional law: essays, cases, and comparative notes / D.P. Kommers, J.E. Finn and G.J. Jacobsohn. Vol. 1. Plymouth, 2010. P. 33–45.
27. Black H.L. A Constitutional Faith. N.Y., 1968.
28. Bork R. A Time to Speak: Selected Writings and Arguments. Wilmington, 2008.
29. Bork R. Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems // Indiana Law Journal1. No. 47 (1971).
30. Вrest P. “The Misguided Quest for the Original Understanding”, 60 Boston University Law Review 204 (1980).
31. Chemerinsky E. Real Discrimination? // Journal of Law & Policy. Vol. 16. 2004. P. 97 - 127.
32. Chemerinsky E. The Assault on the Constitution: Executive Power and the War on Terrorism // Davis Law Review. Vol. 40. 2006. P. 2–20.
33. Chemerinsky E. Two Cheers for State Constitutional Law. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 62. 2010. P. 1695–1710.
34. Clarence T. Why Federalism Matters // Drake Law Review. Vol. 48. Is. 2. P. 34 (2000).
35. Degler C. In search of human nature: biology and culture in American social science, 1880 to present. The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. Oxford, 1991.
36. Dumond D.L. Antislavery. Ann Arbor, 1961.
37. Ely J.H. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, 1980.
38. Ely J.W. The Fuller court: justices, rulings, and legacy. Santa Barbara, 2003. P. 192, 193.
39. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution / ed. by L.W. Levy and K. Karst. 2nd ed.; A. Winkler, associate editor for the 2nd ed. P. 655–657.
40. Fehrenbacher Don. The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics. N.Y., 1978.
41. Feldman S. American Legal Thought from Premodernism to Postmodernism: An Intellectual Voyage. Oxford, 2000. P. 100.
42. Gould L.L. The W.H. Taft presidency. Lawrence, 2009.
43. Graber M. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge, 2006.
44. Graham H.J. Everyman’s Constitution. Madison, 1968.
45. Grey T. “Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution?” 27 Stanford Law Review 703 (1975).
46. Hall K.L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. N.Y., 1992.
47. Huebner T.S. The Taney Court, Justice Rulings and Legacy. Santa Barbara, 2003.
48. Huebner T.S. The Taney Court, "Roger Taney and the Slavery Issue: Looking Beyond - and Before - Dred Scott" // Journal of American History 97: 39–62.
49. Lurie J. W.H. Taft: The travails of a progressive conservative. Cambridge, 2012.
50. Marshall Th. The Constitution: A Living Document // Howard Law Journal 30 (1987): 623–628.
51. Missing the revolution: Darwinism for social scientists / ed. by Jerome H. Barkow. Oxford, 2006.
52. O’Neill J. Originalism in American Law and Politics: A Constitutional History. Baltimore, 2005. P. 15 - 18.
53. Powell H.J. “The Original Understanding of Original Intent” 98 Harvard Law Review 885 (1985).
54. Renstrom P.G. The Taft Court: justices, rulings, and legacy. Santa Barbara, 2003. P. 258.
55. Rosenberg A. Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science and Policy. Cambridge, 2000.
56. Sandefur T. Clarence Thomas’s Jurisprudence Unexplained // New York University Journal of Law & Liberty. Vol. 4. 2009. P. 555.
57. Schultz D.A. Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court. N.Y., 2005. P. 380.
58. Schultz D.A. Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution. N.Y., 2009. P. 434.
59. Sebok A.J. Legal positivism and American Jurisprudence. Cambridge, 2004. P. 39 - 60, 83 - 104.
60. Simon J.F. Lincoln and Chief Justice Taney: Slavery, Secession, and the President's War Powers. N.Y., 2006.
61. Scalia A.A. Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, 1997.
62. Taft W.H. The collected works / ed. by D.H. Burton. Athens, 2001–2004. Vol. 1–8.
63. Urofsky M. Louis D. Brandeis: A Life. N.Y., 2009. Сh. 24.
64. Urofsky M.I. The Supreme Court Justices: A Biographical Dictionary. N.Y., 1994.
65. Wiecek W.M. Abolitionist Constitutional Theory // Encyclopedia of the American Constitution) /ed. by L.W. Levy and K. Karst. 2nd ed.; A. Winkler, associate editor for the 2nd ed. N.Y., 2000. P. 2.
66. Wiecek W.M. The lost world of classical legal thought: law and ideology in America, 1886 - 1937. Oxford, 1998.
67. Wilson W. Constitutional Government in the United States. N.Y., 1908. P. 54, 55.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up