Change in legislation in consumer society

 
PIIS102694520006885-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520006885-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of private and public law of the Penza state University
Affiliation: Penza state University
Address: Russian Federation, Penza
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages125-134
Abstract

The article is devoted to the transformation of law-making and law-enforcement practice in the conditions of consumer society. The perception of a thing as an indicator of status, unjustified overestimation of the value of intellectual rights, property stratification, changes in the trade and financial spheres pose a threat to social, consumer and environmental security. The purpose of the article is to study the actual problems of legal regulation of such new manifestations of the era of consumerism as affluence, astroturfing, planned obsolescence, brand cult, etc. The analysis of the current situation makes it possible to state the need for wider application of public law methods of human rights protection. The author offers a study of the holistic concept of legal regulation in order to achieve an balance of private, public and public interests.

Keywordsconsumer society, transformation of legislation, astroturfing, affluence, planned obsolescence, holistic concept of legal understanding
Received25.09.2020
Publication date12.08.2021
Number of characters39299
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 454

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baudrillard J. Consumer society: its myths and structures. M., 2006 (in Russ.).

2. Borzunova O.A. The Tax Code of the Russian Federation: genesis, history of adoption and trends of improvement. M., 2010. P. 46 (in Russ.).

3. Osipova E.S. Progressive taxation of income as a condition of social justice // Taxes. 2016. No. 1. P. 10 - 16 (in Russ.).

4. Smith G. Evaluation of trademarks. M., 2010. P. 17 (in Russ.).

5. Drozdiak N. Alphabet’s Google Responds to EU Antitrust Fine // Wall Street Journal. 30.10.2018. URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/alphabets-google-responds-to-eu-antitrust-fine-1509388512 (accessed: 25.09.2019).

6. Ferdman R.A. We don’t need to drink less soda, according to research funded by Coca-Cola [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/08/11/the-worlds-largest-seller-of-sugary-drinks-is-telling-people-how-to-lose-weight/ (accessed: 01.09.2019).

7. Givel M. Consent and Counter-Mobilization: The Case of The National Smokers Alliance // Journal of Health Communication. 2007. No. 12 (4). P. 339–357.

8. Graaf J., Naylor T., Wann D. Affluenza: The All-Consuming Epidemic. San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler, 2002.

9. Gross G. FTC settles complaint about fake video game testimonials. Reuters. 26.08.2010 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/urnidgns852573c4006938/ (accessed: 01.09.2019).

10. Malbon J. Taking Fake Online Consumer Reviews Seriously // Journal of Consumer Policy. 2013. No. 36 (2). P. 139–157.

11. Neil M. Affluenza' teen on probation for fatal crash is sent to pricey rehab [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: URL: http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/affluenza (accessed: 29.06.2019).

12. Staff Report on the Development and Structure of the U. S. Electric Lamp Industry. Federal Trade Commision (1980) [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: URL: https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/ (accessed: 25.09.2019).

13. Steele S., Gary Ruskin G., McKee M., Stuckler D. “Always read the small print”: a case study of commercial research funding, disclosure and agreements with Coca-Cola // Journal of Public Health Policy. 2019. Vol. 39. P. 1 - 13.

14. Streitfeld D. The Best Book Reviews Money Can Buy // The New York Times. 25.08.2012. P. 14 - 16.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up