Mortal sins of criminalistic methods as a measure of the purity of the crimi-nal procedure

The article is devoted to the historical relationship of the structure of pre-trial proceedings and criminalistic methods. Formed some of the scientist opinion about the only calling of criminology - to serve the criminal procedure, expressed by A.S. Alexandrov in his sensational article about the seven deadly sins of modern criminology, created a false idea about the level of development of science itself, and its relationship with the criminal procedure. In the present article using historical examples shows how futile search for unilateral dependence of the structure of criminalistic methods on the structure of pre-trial proceedings, and the benefits of joint solutions to the problems of theory and practice.

Keywords

criminalistic methods, structure of methods, criminalistics, historical interrelation, theory, law enforcement practice

Received

18.09.2019

Publication date

23.09.2019

Number of characters

29116

Cite

GOST	Exarkhopulo A. "Mortal sins" of criminalistic methods as a measure of the "purity" of the crimi-nal procedure // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2019. – Issue 9 C. 44-51 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S013207690006729-3-1 (circulation date: 20.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006729-3
MLA	Exarkhopulo, Aleksey ""Mortal sins" of criminalistic methods as a measure of the "purity" of the crimi-nal procedure." Gosudarstvo i pravo 9 (2019):44-51. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006729-3
APA	Exarkhopulo A. (2019). "Mortal sins" of criminalistic methods as a measure of the "purity" of the crimi-nal procedure. Gosudarstvo i pravo (9), pp.44-51 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006729-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1228

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alexandrov A.S. "Seven deadly sins of modern criminology". URL: http://www.iuaj.net/node/342#_ftnref6 (in Russ.).

2. Anushat E. The Art of solving crimes and the laws of logic. M., 2001. P. 72 (in Russ.).

3. Barshev Ya. Bases of criminal proceedings with application to the Russian criminal proceedings. SPb., 1841. S. III (in Russ.).

4. Bezlepkin B.T. Reference book of the investigator and of the inquirer. M., 2008. P. 34 (in Russ.).

5. Belkin R.S. Course of criminology: 3 t. T. 3. Criminalistic tools, techniques and recommendations. M., 1997. P. 117, 118 (in Russ.).

6. Vasiliev A.N. Critical remarks in relation to criminology and criminal procedure theory of evidence // Soviet State and Law. 1979. No. 4. P. 88 (in Russ.).

7. Vladimirov L.E. The doctrine of criminal evidence. Tula, 2002. P. 341 (in Russ.).

8. Gorsky G.F., Kokorev L.D., Elkind P.C. Problem of evidence in the Soviet criminal process. Voronezh, 1978. P. 48 - 56 (in Russ.).

9. Gross G. Guidelines for court investigators as the system of criminalistics / per. with him. 4th ed. SPb., 1908. C. X, 10, 13 (in Russ.).

10. Dinevski V.P. Our preliminary investigation: its shortcomings and reform. Kiev, 2003. P. 70 (in Russ.).

11. History of the investigation of Russia: a textbook for students. of the high schools trained on a speciality "Jurisprudence" / ed.: A.K. Averchenko et al., 2015. P. 5 (in Russ.).

12. Criminalist knows how! Autarkic forensics: do we need it? [Electronic resource] access Mode: URL: http://www.iuaj.net/node/342#comment-10 (accessed: 01.08.2018) (in Russ.).

13. Linovsky V.A. Experience of historical investigations of investigative criminal proceedings in Russia. M., 2001. P. 62, 63, 76, 128, 129 (in Russ.).

14. Theory of judicial evidence in Soviet law. 3-e Izd., DOP. M., 1950. P. 136, 137 (in Russ.).

15. Elkind P.S. Goals and means to achieve them in the Soviet Criminal procedure Law. L., 1976. P. 109 (in Russ.).

16. Engels F. Dialectics of nature. M., 1936. P. 69 (in Russ.).