Number of purchasers: 0, views: 766
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Ainana, L., and N. Zagrebin. 2014. S’edobnye rasteniia eskimosov [Edible Plants of the Eskimos]. Anchorage: Programma Sluzhby natsional’nykh parkov SShA “Obshchee nasledie Beringii”.
2. Ayantunde, A.A., et al. 2008. Botanical Knowledge and Its Differentiation by Age, Gender and Ethnicity in Southwestern Niger. Human Ecology 36 (6): 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9200-7
3. Bogoraz, W.G. 1904. The Chukchee: Material Culture. Leiden: EJ Brill.
4. Bogoraz, W.G. 1907. The Chuckchee: Social Organization. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 11 (3): 277–733.
5. Bogoraz, W.G. 1913. The Eskimo of Siberia: The Jessup North Pacific Expedition. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 8 (4): 419–453.
6. Brandt, R., et al. 2013. Knowledge and Valuation of Andean Agroforestry Species: The Role of Sex, Age, and Migration among Members of a Rural Community in Bolivia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9 (83). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-83
7. Chlenov, M.A., and I.I. Krupnik. 2016. Naukan: glavy k istorii [Naukan: Chapters to History]. In Spasti i sokhranit’. Kul’turnoe nasledie Chukotki: problemy i perspektivy sokhraneniia [Save and Keep. Cultural Heritage of Chukotka: Problems and Perspectives of Keeping]. Materials of scientific-practical conference in Anadyr’. 12-14 April 2016. Issue 1, edited by M.M. Bronshtein, 38–74. Moscow-Anadyr’: Gosudarstvennyi muzei Vostoka.
8. de Albuquerque, U.P., et al. 2011. The Use of Plants in the Medical System of the Fulni-ô People (NE Brazil): A Perspective on Age and Gender. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 133 (2): 866–873. htpps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.11.021
9. Dneprovskii, K.A. 2016. Naukan: sovremennoe sostoianie unikal’nogo pamiatnika istorii i kul’tury Chukotki [Modern State of the Unique Monument of History and Culture of Chukotka]. In Spasti i sokhranit’: kul’turnoe nasledie Chukotki: problemy i perspektivy sokhraneniia [Save and Keep: Cultural Heritage of Chukotka: Problems and Perspectives of Keeping: Materials of Scientific-Practical Conference in Anadyr’. 12–14 April 2016], edited by M.M. Bronshtein, 1: 22–38. Moscow; Anadyr’: Gosudarstvennyi muzei Vostoka.
10. Dneprovskii, K.A., and E.G. Devlet. 2017. K voprosu o konstruktivnykh osobennostiakh zhilishch drevnikh eskimosov po materialam arkheologii, etnografii i izobrazitel’nym istochnikam [On the Question of the Design Features of the Ancient Eskimos’ Dwellings Based on Materials of Archeology, Ethnography and Visual Sources]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury 3 (57): 210–251.
11. Dneprovskii, K.A., and N.V. Lopatin. 2016. Arkheologicheskie nakhodki na territorii Naukana [Archaeological Finds on the Territory of Naukan]. In Spasti i sokhranit’: kul’turnoe nasledie Chukotki: problemy i perspektivy sokhraneniia [Save and Keep: Cultural Heritage of Chukotka: Problems and Perspectives of Keeping: Materials of Scientific-Practical Conference in Anadyr’. 12–14 April 2016], edited by M.M. Bronshtein, 1: 82–96. Moscow; Anadyr’: Gosudarstvennyi muzei Vostoka.
12. Dorais, L. 2010. Language of the Inuit: Syntax, Semantics, and Society in the Arctic. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
13. Ford, R.I. 1994. Ethnobotany: Historical Diversity and Synthesis. In The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany, edited by R.I. Ford, 33–49. Ann Arbor: Museum of Athropology; University of Michigan.
14. Godovykh, T.V., L.I. Dokhnova, and T.I. Tyneny. 2005. Rasteniia v Etnomeditsine Chukotki [Plants in Ethnomedicine of Chukotka]. Magadan: Chukotskii filial Severo-Vostochnogo kompleksnogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta DVO RAN.
15. Gorenflo, L.J., S. Romaine, R.A. Mittermeier, and K. Walker-Painemilla. 2012. Co-Occurrence of Linguistic and Biological Diversity in Biodiversity Hotspots and High Biodiversity Wilderness Areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (21): 8032–8037. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117511109
16. Guimbo, I.D., J.G. Mueller, and M. Larwanou. 2011. Ethnobotanical Knowledge of Men, Women and Children in Rural Niger: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 9: 235–242. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.9.0.235-242
17. Jernigan, K., et al. 2016. A Comparison of Indigenous Health-Related Plant Use of the Russian and Alaskan Sides of the Bering Strait. Paper presented at the 15th Congress of the International Society of Ethnobiology. Kampala: Makerere University.
18. Jernigan, K., O. Belichenko, V. Kolosova, and D. Orr. 2017. Naukan ethnobotany in post-Soviet times: lost edibles and new medicinals. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 13 (61): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0188-1
19. Jernigan, K., et al. 2019. Gathering “Mouse Roots” Among the Naukan and Chukchi of the Russian Far East. Ethnobiology Letters 10 (1): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.10.1.2019.1605
20. Kerttula, A.M. 1997. Antler on the Sea: Creating and Maintaining Cultural Group Boundaries among the Chukchi, Yupik, and Newcomers of Sireniki. Arctic Anthropology 34 (1): 212–226.
21. Krauss, M.E. 1980. Alaska Native Languages: Past, Present, and Future. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.
22. Krupnik I., and N. Vakhtin. 1997. Indigenous Knowledge in Modern Culture: Siberian Yupik Ecological Legacy in Transition. Arctic Anthropology 34 (1): 236–252.
23. Krupnik, I., and M. Chlenov. 2013. Yupik Transitions: Change and Survival at Bering Strait, 1900–1960. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Press.
24. Krupnik, I., L. Bogoslovskaya, B. Alpyrgin, and E. Dobrieva. 2013. Naukanskii “Ledovyi slovar”: k rekonstruktsii kul’turnogo landshafta [“Ice Dictionary” of Naukan: To the Reconstruction of the Cultural Landscape]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii 9 (3): 166–95.
25. Krupnik, I.I. 2018. Ledovye prostranstva arkticheskikh morei kak aborigennyi kul’turnyi landshaft [Ice Spaces of the Arctic Seas as Aboriginal Cultural Landscape]. Nasledie i Sovremennost’ 1 (4): 73–91.
26. Lunelli, N.P., M.A. Ramos, and C.J.F. de Oliveira Júnior. 2016. Do Gender and Age Influence Agroforestry Farmers’ Knowledge of Tree Species Uses in an Area of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil? Acta Botanica Brasilica 30 (4): 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062016abb0226
27. Maffi, L. 2005. Linguistic, Cultural, and Biological Diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 34 (1): 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120437
28. Menovshchikov, G.A. 1974. Dikie rasteniia v ratsione korennykh zhitelei Chukotki [Wild Plants in the Diet of the Indigenous People of Chukotka]. Sovetskaia etnografiia 2: 93–99.
29. Menovshchikov, G.A. 1975. Yazyk naukanskikh eskimosov [The Language of the Naukan Eskimos]. Leningrad: Nauka.
30. Menovshchikov, G.A. 1987. Materialy i issledovaniia po yazyku i fol’kloru naukanskikh eskimosov [Materials and Research on the Language and Folklore of the Naukan Eskimos]. Leningrad: Nauka.
31. Merkulova, V.A. 1967. Ocherki po russkoi narodnoi nomenklature rastenii: travy, griby, yagody [Essays on the Russian Folk Nomenclature of Plants: Herbs, Mushrooms, Berries]. Moscow: Nauka.
32. Mimykg Avtonova, I.V. 1992. Edible Wild Plants in Our Foods (Chukchi, Eskimo). Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia 31 (1): 88–97. https://doi.org/10.2753/AAE1061-1959310188
33. Pieroni, A., and C.L. Quave. 2006. Functional Foods or Food Medicines? On the Consumption of Wild Plant among Albanians and Southern Italians in Lucania. In Eating and Healing: Traditional Food as Medicine, edited by A. Pieroni and L.L. Price, 101–129. New York: Haworth Press.
34. Sokolova, T.G. 1961. K voprosu ob ispol’zovanii chukotskim naseleniem dikoi flory v raione mysa Dezhneva [On the Question of the Use of Wild Flora by the Chukchi Population in the Area of Cape Dezhnev]. In Zapiski Chukotskogo kraevedcheskogo muzeia [Notes of the Chukotka Museum of Local Lore], 2: 96–97. Magadan: Knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
35. Sõukand, R. 2016. Perceived Reasons for Changes in the Use of wild food Plants in Saaremaa, Estonia. Appetite 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.011
36. Tein, T.S, D.B. Shimkin, and S. Kan. 1994. Shamans of the Siberian Eskimos. Arctic Anthropology 31(1): 117–125.
37. Tikhomirov, B.A. 1958. Dannye o poleznykh rasteniiakh eskimosov yugo-vostochnogo poberezh’ia Chukotki [Data on Useful Plants of the Eskimos of the Southeastern Coast of Chukotka]. Botanicheskii zhurnal 40 (2): 242–246.
38. Yamin-Pasternak, S. 2007. How the Devils Went Deaf: Ethnomycology, Cuisine, and Perception of Landscape in the Russian North. PhD abstract, University of Alaska.
39. Yamin-Pasternak, S. 2008. From Disgust to Desire: Changing Attitudes toward Beringian Mushrooms. Economic Botany 62 (3): 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9020-0
40. Yamin-Pasternak, S., et al. 2014. The Rotten Renaissance in the Bering Strait. Current Anthropology 55 (5): 619–646. https://doi.org/10.1086/678305