Income inequality: Global trends in labour share of GDP

Recent trends in the labour share of income dynamics in high- and middle-income countries and the relationship between the amount of GDP paid out in wages, salaries and benefits and inequality in income distribution are examined in this article. The growing concern about the rising inequality due to COVID-19 worldwide explains the necessity of research in this field. To detect the trend, the autoregressive model is examined, which is estimated by the least squares dummy variable method for panel data A negative trend was revealed for countries with a high share of labor of output in the period of the 1990–2010s, which was replaced by a weak positive trend. At the same time, for several countries with a low share of labor in GDP, negative trends intensified after the global economic crisis. For the group of countries where compensation for labor costs averages from 42 to 56% of GDP, the hypothesis of a trend was not confirmed. Our results confirm the relevance of negative trends in the share of labor compensation of income caused by such common factors as technological change or globalization in the period 1990–2010 and point to divergent trends in the decade following the global crisis.

Keywords

labour share, income distribution, inequality, Gini index, trend-stationarity process, panel data, unit root test

Acknowledgment

This paper was supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.

Received

30.10.2023

Publication date

28.12.2023

Number of characters

29141

Cite

GOST	Balashova S., Matyushok V., Khrustalev E. Income inequality: Global trends in labour share of GDP // Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody – 2023. – V. 59. – no. 4 C. 19-31 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://emm.jes.su/S042473880028222-3-1 (circulation date: 15.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880028222-3
MLA	Balashova, Svetlana, Matyushok, Vladimir, Khrustalev, Evgeny "Income inequality: Global trends in labour share of GDP." Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody 59.4 (2023):19-31. DOI: 10.31857/S042473880028222-3
APA	Balashova S., Matyushok V., Khrustalev E. (2023). Income inequality: Global trends in labour share of GDP. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody 59(4), pp.19-31 DOI: 10.31857/S042473880028222-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 103

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Acemoglu D. (2003). Labor- and capital augmenting technical change. J. of the European Economic Association, 1 (1), 1–37. DOI: 10.1162/154–247603322256756

2. Alvaredo F., Chancel L., Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. (2018). World inequality report 2018. Available at: https://wir2018.wid.world/

3. Anisimova G.V. (2013). Inequality and economic growth in the economy globalization. Economics and Entrepreneurship, 2 (31), 62–68 (in Russian).

4. Aum S., Shin Y. (2020). Why is the labor share declining? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 102 (4), 413–428. DOI: 10.20955/r.102.413-28

5. Bai J., Ng S. (2004). A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration. Econometrica, 72 (4), 1127–1177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–0262.2004.00528.x

6. Balashova S. (2022). Recent trends in personal income and the impact of Covid-19: Case of Russia. Chap. 22. In: A.P. Duarte, S. Redzepagic, F. Murta (eds.). The European integration process: Crisis and resilience in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic. Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 391–407. DOI: 10.14195/978-989-26-2364-1

7. Breitung J., Pesaran M.H. (2008). Unit roots and cointegration in panels. Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics, 46 (1565), 279–322. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75892-1_9.

8. Dabla-Norris E., Kochhar K., Suphaphiphat N., Ricka F., Tsounta E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective. IMF Staff Discussion Notes, 15 (13), 1. DOI: 10.5089/9781513555188.006

9. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49 (4), 1057. DOI: 10.2307/1912517

10. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115 (1), 53–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076 (03)00092-7

11. Jones C.I., Romer P.M. (2009). The new Kaldor facts: Ideas, institutions, population, and human capital. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2 (1), 224–245. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

12. Kaldor N. (1961). Capital accumulation and economic growth. In: D.C. Hague (ed.). The theory of capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 177–222. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-08452-4_10

13. Kantorovich G.G. (2002). Time series analysis. The HSE Economic Journal, 6, 3, 379–401 (in Russian).

14. Khrustalev E.Yu., Baranova N.M. (2013). Intelligent semantic models for improving the quality of educational and research processes. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 35, 2–10 (in Russian).

15. Krugman P. (2014). Wealth over work. The New York Times, March. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/opinion/krugman-wealth-over-work.html

16. Larin S.N., Khrustalev E.Yu., Novak N.V. (2020). Transformation of the structure of intellectual capital and the growing importance of its components – human capital and intellectual property — in the modern economy. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 16, 4, 745–758. DOI: 10.24891/ni.16.4.745 (in Russian).

17. Levin A., Lin C.-F., James Chu C.-S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108 (1), 1–24. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076 (01)00098-7

18. Manyika J., Mischke J., Bughin J., Woetzel J., Krishnan M., Cudre S. (2019). A new look at the declining labor share of income in the United States. McKinsey Global Institute Discussion Paper, 1–61. Available at: www.mckinsey.com/mgi

19. Matyushok V.M., Balashova S.A. (2021). Inequality of world development as a global “challenge” and “response” models. The World of New Economy, 15 (4), 74–87. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2021-15-4-74-87 (in Russian).

20. Matyushok V.M., Krasavina V.A., Matyushok S.V. (2020). The global market of artificial intel-ligence systems and technologies: Formation and development trends. RUDN Journal of Economics, 28, 3, 505–521. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2319-2020-28-3-505-521 (in Russian).

21. OECD (2015). The labour share in G20 economies. Report prepared for the G20 employment working group. Antalya, Turkey, 26–27 February 2015.

22. Piketty T. (2014). Le Capital au XXIe siècle; in English: Piketty T. (2014). Capital in the twenty first century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

23. Piketty T. (2015). Capital in the twenty first century. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. 592 p. (in Russian).

24. Piketty T. (2019). Capital et idéologie. PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris. (Postprint) halshs–02301306, HAL.

25. Rimashevskaya N.M. (2005). On the problem of overcoming poverty and inequality. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 3, 46–51 (in Russian).

26. Sheviakov A.N. (2005). Social inequality, poverty and economic growth. Society and Economy, 3, 5–18 (in Russian).

27. Sheviakov A.N. (2010). Social inequality: hindrance for economic and demographic growth. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 5 (147), 38–52 (in Russian).

28. Skorobotov A. (2016). Testing for the presence of unit roots in panel data with a homogeneous alternative. Naychnyi Vestnik IEP Gaidar.ru, 11, 39–46 (in Russian).

29. Skrobotov A. (2017). Unit root tests for panel data against plural alternatives with application to regional consumer price index of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Entrepreneur-ship, 18 (2), 175–184. DOI: 10.18334/rp.18.2.37274 (in Russian).

30. Stiglitz J.E. (2013). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

31. Tugcu C.T. (2018). Panel data analysis in the energy-growth nexus (EGN). The economics and econometrics of the energy-growth nexus. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc., 255–271. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812746-9.00008-0

32. Varshavsky A.E. (2019). Excessive income inequality — problems and threats for Russia. Sociological Studies (Socis), 8, 52–61. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006136-2 (in Russian).

33. Varshavsky A.E. (2021). On the current problems of economic development, inequality and its impact on our lives. Analysis and Modeling of Economic and Social Processes: Mathematics. Computer. Education, 28, 22–37 (in Russian).

34. Varshavsky A.E. (2022). A model for analyzing income inequality based on a finite functional sequence (adequacy and application problems). Computer Research and Modeling. Compend. of Sc. Works, 14 (3), 521–523. DOI: 10.20537/2076-7633-2022-14-3-675-689 (in Russian).

35. Varshavsky A.E. (2007). Slowing the spread of innovation and transition towards a knowledge society with growing economic inequality. Concepts. Scientific and Practical Magazine, 2 (19), 3–36 (in Russian).

36. Wooldridge J.M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press.