All
 
|
 
 


Leading Role of the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Soviet Academy of Sciences in Organization, Management and Development of the Complex Programs of Scientific and Technological Progress, 1972—1988
 
PIIS042473880000275-1-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880000660-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Alexander E. Varshavsky 
Affiliation: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Anatoly Yarkin
Affiliation: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 54 Issue 3
Pages68-89
Abstract

The article describes the leading role of the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (CEMI RAS, formerly CEMI of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR) in the organization, management and development of the Complex Programs of Scientific and Technological Progress (CP STP) for the USSR and subsequently for Russia. The authors who took part in the elaboration of all CP STP, explain in detail, that the initiative of the large-scale research in the USSR in this field belonged to the Department of Economy of the Soviet Academy of Sciences and to its research institutes. In the period under consideration, both the Department of Economics and the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, where the authors worked were both led by the Academician Nikolay P. Fedorenko. The authors explain how the development of the CP STP. They also show the leading role of the Academy of Sciences in the organization and management of the CP STP was managed. Moreover, they briefly describe the content and the practical outputs of all four CP STP, developed in 1972—1988. The content of all four CP STP, which were developed in 1972—1988, and the main practical results are briefly described. Follows the discussion of the methodological principles that guided the development of the CP STP and the importance of these programs for the economic science, the Soviet economy and its management. Special attention is paid to the leading role of the CEMI and its staff in the development of the CP STP. The authors believe that the current management of the scientific, technological and innovative development of the Russian economy must be based on a long-term complex program, which should largely take into account the experience of the development of the CP STP. They also call for the elaboration of the scenarios and alternative ways of development of the economy sectors as well as for the analysis of their condition and technological basis. Thus it will be possible to estimate the impact and the economic effectiveness effect from the use of the new technologies brought by the progress of science.

KeywordsScientific and technological management, innovative development, economics, long-term policy, management, development, Complex Programs of Scientific and Technological Progress (CP STP).
Received03.10.2018
Publication date10.10.2018
Number of characters1651
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1970

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Anchishkin A.I. (1973). Prognozirovanie rosta sotsialisticheskoj ehkonomiki. M.: Ehkonomika.

2. Anchishkin A.I. (1980). Metodologiya prognozirovaniya razvitiya narodnogo khozyajstva // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 1. S. 15—26.

3. Anchishkin A.I. (1986). Nauka, tekhnika, ehkonomika. M.: Ehkonomika.

4. Anchishkin A.I. Prognozirovanie tempov i faktorov ehkonomicheskogo rosta (2003). Suvorov A.V. (sost.). M.: MAKS Press.
5. Braginskij O.B. (2009). Neftekhimicheskij kompleks mira. M.: Academia.

6. Varshavskij A.E. (1982a). Metodicheskie problemy razrabotki otraslevykh nauchno-tekhnicheskikh prognozov // Izvestiya AN SSSR, seriya ehkonomicheskaya. № 2. S. 41—50.

7. Varshavskij A.E. (1982b). Kompleksnaya programma nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa. Mezhdunarodnaya monografiya “Upravlenie nauchno-tekhnicheskogo razvitiya v usloviyakh sotsializma”. Gl. 6. M.: Progress. S. 100-127.

8. Varshavskij A.E. (2003). Razvitie ehkonomiki znanij i problemy obespecheniya preemstvennosti v ehkonomicheskoj nauke Rossii. V sb.: “Anchishkin A.I. Prognozirovanie tempov i faktorov ehkonomicheskogo rosta”. Suvorov A.V. (sost.). M.: MAKS Press.

9. Varshavskij A.E. (2005). Real'naya rezul'tativnost' rossijskoj nauki // Kontseptsii. №1 (15). S. 21—36.

10. Varshavskij A.E. (2008). Ehkonomicheskie problemy razrabotki nauchno-tekhnicheskoj i innovatsionnoj politiki Rossii v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Kontseptsii. № 2 (21). S. 3—28.

11. Varshavskij A.E. (2011a). Problemy nauki i ee rezul'tativnost' // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 1. S. 151—157.

12. Varshavskij A.E. (2011b). O Vladimire Aleksandroviche Kotel'nikove. V kn.: “V.A. Kotel'nikov. Sud'ba, okhvativshaya vek”. T. 1. “Vospominaniya kolleg”. M.:Fizmatlit. S. 294—299.
13. Varshavskij A.E. (2013). A.I. Anchishkin o razvitii nauki, tekhnologii i tekhniki (K 80-letiyu akademika A.I. Anchishkina) // Kontseptsii. №1 (30). S. 56-72.

14. Varshavskij A.E. (2014a). Kompleksnye programmy nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa strany — uspeshnyj primer realizatsii indikativnogo planirovaniya. Analiz i modelirovanie ehkonomicheskikh i sotsial'nykh protsessov. Sb. nauch. trudov “Matematika. Komp'yuter. Obrazovanie”. Vyp. 21. № 2. M., Izhevsk: NITs “Regulyarnaya i khaoticheskaya dinamika”. S. 185—197.

15. Varshavskij A.E. (2014b). Problemnye innovatsii: riski dlya chelovechestva. M.: Lenand.

16. Varshavskij A.E. (2017). O strategii nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. № 6. S. 5—27.

17. Varshavskij A.E., Makarov V.L. (2015). Nauka, vysokotekhnologichnye otrasli i innovatsii. V kn.: “Ehkonomika Rossii. Oksfordskij sbornik”. Kniga 2. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara. S. 815—846.

18. Varshavskij A.E., Klebaner V.S., Mirabyan L.M., Zheleznyakova L.G. (1994). Kharakteristika i prognoz razvitiya nauki i tekhnologij v Rossii  (analizehkspertnykh otsenok). Makarov V.L., Varshavskij A.E. (red.). M.: TsEhMI RAN.

19. Varshavskij A.E., Yarkin A.P. (2009). Kompleksnye programmy nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa strany na dolgosrochnuyu perspektivu // Kontseptsii. № 1 (22). S. 22—41.

20. Varshavskij A.E., Yarkin A.P. (2012). O dolgosrochnykh programmakh nauchno-tekhnicheskogo i sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Opyt razrabotki Kompleksnykh programm nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa. Glava 15: “Ehkonomicheskie problemy razvitiya revolyutsionnykh tekhnologij: nanotekhnologii”. Makarov V.L., Varshavskij A.E. (ruk. avt. kollektiva). M.: Nauka. S. 379—395.
21. Gladyshevskij A.I. (2004). Prognozirovanie vosproizvodstvennykh protsessov v ehkonomike (investitsionnyj aspekt). M.: MAKS Press.

22. Ershov Eh.B. (2008). Razvitie i realizatsiya idej modeli mezhotraslevykh vzaimodejstvij dlya rossijskoj ehkonomiki // Ehkonomicheskij zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. T. 12. № 1. S. 1—29.

23. Innovatsionnaya orientatsiya rossijskikh ehkonomicheskikh institutov. (2009). Dement'ev V.E. (red.). M.: Knizhnyj dom “LIBROKOM”.
24. Innovatsionnyj menedzhment v Rossii: voprosy strategicheskogo upravleniya i nauchno-tekhnologicheskoj bezopasnosti (2004). Makarov V.L., Varshavskij A.E. (ruk. avt. kollektiva). M.: Nauka.

25. Kotel'nikov V.A. (1979). Problemy perspektivnogo planirovaniya nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa // Planovoe khozyajstvo. № 7. S. 44—49.

26. Kotel'nikov V.A. (2011). Sud'ba, okhvativshaya vek. V 2-kh t. T. 1. “Vospominaniya kolleg”. M.: Fizmatlit.

27. Makarov V.L. (2010). Sotsial'nyj klasterizm. Rossijskij vyzov. M.: Biznes Atlas.

28. Makarov V.L., Bakhtizin A.R. (2013). Sotsial'noe modelirovanie — novyj komp'yuternyj proryv (agent-orientirovannye modeli). M.: Ehkonomika.

29. Mezoehkonomika razvitiya (2011). Klejner G.B. (red.). M.: Nauka
30. Metodologicheskie problemy kompleksnogo prognozirovaniya nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa (1978). V sb.: “Kompleksnoe prognozirovanie nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa v oblasti orudij truda”. Varshavskij A.E. (red.). M.: Tsentral'nyj ehkonomiko-matematicheskij institut AN SSSR.

31. Nauka i vysokie tekhnologii Rossii na rubezhe tret'ego tysyacheletiya (sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie aspekty razvitiya) (2001). Makarov V.L., Varshavskij A.E. (ruk. avt. kollektiva). M.: Nauka.

32. Ocherki o zhizni i nauchnoj deyatel'nosti akademika A.I. Anchishkina (2013). M.: Infra-M.

33. Polterovich V.M. (2007). Ehlementy teorii reform. M.: Ehkonomika.

34. Prikladnoe prognozirovanie natsional'noj ehkonomiki (2007). Ivanter V.V. (red.). M.: Ehkonomist'.

35. Prognozirovanie ehkonomicheskogo rosta (2017). V sb.: “Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii, priurochennoj k 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika Yu.V. Yaremenko” Ivanter V.V. (otv. red.). M.: MAKS Press.

36. Strategiya modernizatsii Rossijskoj ehkonomiki (2010). Polterovich V.M. (red.). M.: Aletejya.
37. Fal'tsman V.K. (2003). Ehkonomicheskij rost. Ot proshlogo k buduschemu. M.: Al'pina Pablisher.

38. Fal'tsman V.K. (2013). Kompleksnaya programma nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa: dostizheniya, uroki i perspektivy. V sb.: “A.I. Anchishkin o razvitii nauki, tekhnologii i tekhniki. Ocherki o zhizni i nauchnoj deyatel'nosti akademika A.I. Anchishkina”. M.: Infra-M.

39. Fedorenko N.P. (1999). Vspominaya proshloe, zaglyadyvayu v buduschee. M.: Nauka.

40. Fedorenko N.P. (2001). Rossiya: uroki proshlogo i liki buduschego. M.: Ehkonomika.

41. Fedorenko N.P. (2003). Rossiya na rubezhe vekov. M.: Ehkonomika.

42. Chernavskij S.Ya. (2013). Reformy reguliruemykh otraslej rossijskoj ehnergetiki. M., SPb: Nestor-Istoriya.

43. Ehkonomicheskie problemy razvitiya revolyutsionnykh tekhnologij. Nanotekhnologii (2012). Makarov V.L., Varshavskij A.E. (ruk. avt. kollektiva). M.: Nauka.

44. Yaremenko Yu.V. (1981). Strukturnye izmeneniya v sotsialisticheskoj ehkonomike. M.: Mysl'.

45. Yaremenko Yu.V. (1984). Modelirovanie mezhotraslevykh vzaimodejstvij. M.: Nauka.

46. Yaremenko Yu.V., Ershov Eh.B., Smyshlyaev A.S. (1975). Model' mezhotraslevykh vzaimodejstvij // Ehkonomika imatematicheskie metody. T. XI. Vyp. 3. S. 421—438.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up