The Nature of the Diamond Potential of Cold Paleogeotherms

It’s known that Р-Т parameters of diamond-bearing kimberlite xenoliths correspond to subductive paleogeotherms lying between the 36 and 41mW/m2 conductive models. On nowdays there are some researches showing the correlation of diamond ability from oxygen fugacity and fluid composition of mantle xenoliths. The most diamondiferous samples correspond to water compositions of calculated O-H-C fluid with minimum atomic carbon content in it. From the calculations it follows that the fluid carbon atomic content increases with temperature decreasing and with pressure decreasing. The most minor C contents has 35 mW/m2 conductive model in the comparing with 40 and 45 mW/m2 models. As a result, it is possible to conclude that the low temperature fields of the “cold” geotherms have highest diamondiferous ability.

Keywords

Received

10.11.2018

Publication date

10.11.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Simakov S. The Nature of the Diamond Potential of "Cold" Paleogeotherms // Doklady Akademii nauk – 2018. – V. 482. – Issue 4 C. 444-446 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/dan/s086956520003098-0-1-en (circulation date: 05.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S086956520003098-0
MLA	Simakov, Sergey "The Nature of the Diamond Potential of "Cold" Paleogeotherms." Doklady Akademii nauk 482.4 (2018):444-446. DOI: 10.31857/S086956520003098-0
APA	Simakov S. (2018). The Nature of the Diamond Potential of "Cold" Paleogeotherms. Doklady Akademii nauk 482(4), pp.444-446 DOI: 10.31857/S086956520003098-0

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Laz'ko E.E. Glubinnye vklyucheniya ul'tramafitov v kimberlitakh. V kn.: Magmaticheskie gornye porody. M: Nauka. 1988. s.346-379.

2. Logvinova A.M. i dr.// Geologiya i geofizika, 2015. T.56. №1-2, S. 397-415.

3. Ponomarenko A.I. // DAN SSSR. 1977, T.235, №4, s.914-917.

4. Pokhilenko N.P., Sobolev N.V., Lavrent'ev Yu.G. // DAN SSSR. 1976, t.231, №2, s.438-441.

5. Sobolev N.V. Glubinnye vklyucheniya v kimberlitakh i problema sostava verkhnej mantii. Novosibirsk: Nauka,1974. 264 s.

6. Sobolev N.V., Pokhilenko N.P., Efimova Eh.S. // Geologiya i geofizika, 1984, №12, s. 63-80.

7. Simakov S.K. // DAN. 2014. T.458, № 3. C.333-335.

8. Colov'eva L.V., Zav'yalova L.L. // Petrologo-geofizicheskie issledovaniya regional'nykh struktur SSSR. M. 1992, No 14, C. 21-34.

9. Ukhanov A.V., Ryabchikov I.D., Khar'kiv A.D. Litosfernaya mantiya Yakutskoj kimberlitovoj provintsii. Moskva: Nauka,1988. 286 s.

10. Grutter H., Latti D. Menzies A. // J. Petrology. V. 47. Is. 4.P. 801-820

11. Hasterok D., Chapman D.S. // Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2011. V.307, No 1-2. P.59–70

12. Pokhilenko N.P., Pearson D.G., Boyd F.R., Sobolev N.V. // Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 1991. V.90, P.11-23.

13. Simakov S.K. // Geoch. Cosm. Acta. 1998. V. 62. № 10. P.1811-1820.

14. Stachel T., Luth R.W. // Lithos. 2015. V. 220–223. P. 200–220.

15. Zhang, C., Duan, Z.H., // Geoch. Cosm. Acta. 2009. V. 73, P. 2089–2102.