A human being and an object in contemporary concepts of foreign museology: The change of paradigms?

In historiography anthropological turn is considered to be the determining factor of museгum work since the 1970th. It is a human being, not an object, that is the focus of institutional attention, and interaction with communities of all kinds becomes one of the most important directions of museum work. At the same time, a number of concepts have emerged in the English-speaking museology in the latest decade, proposing to review subject-object relations in the museum space. The concepts of relational museum, distributed museum and liquid museum are analyzed in the article. As activities of the museum as a form of culture reflects the laws of “large» culture, these approaches can be productive for the analysis of the general cultural paradigms of the beginning of the 21th century.

Keywords

human being, object, museum, relational museum, distributed museum and liquid museum.

Publication date

29.10.2018

Number of characters

799

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Ananiev V. A human being and an object in contemporary concepts of foreign museology: The change of paradigms? // Chelovek – 2018. – Issue №5 C. 84-90 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070001943-4-1 (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070001943-4
MLA	Ananiev, Vitaliy G "A human being and an object in contemporary concepts of foreign museology: The change of paradigms?." Chelovek 5 (2018):84-90. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070001943-4
APA	Ananiev V. (2018). A human being and an object in contemporary concepts of foreign museology: The change of paradigms?. Chelovek (5), pp.84-90 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070001943-4


1	Здесь будет статья

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1964

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb., 2008.

2. Drikker A.S. Muzejnyj bum kak fenomen demokraticheskoj kul'tury // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Filosofiya. Kul'turologiya. Politologiya. Pravo. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2012. № 3.

3. Drikker A.S. Muzejnyj bum: Pozitiv, negativ, perspektivy // Muzej — Pamyatnik — Nasledie. 2017. № 2 // URL: http://museumstudy.ru/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/Drikker.pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.04.2018 g.)

4. Mensh P. van. K metodologii muzeologii. SPb., 2014.

5. Cameron F. Beyond the cult of the replicant — museums and historical digital objects: traditional concerns, new discourses // Theorizing digital cultural heritage: a critical discourse / ed. by F. Cameron, S. Kenderdine. Cambridge, MA, 2007.

6. Cameron F. Ecologizing Experimentations. A Method and Manifesto for Composing a Post-humanist Museum // Climate Change and Museum Futures / ed. by F.R. Cameron, B. Neilson. L.; N.Y., 2015.

7. Cameron F. Liquid governmentalities, liquid museums and the climate crisis // Hot topics, public culture, museums / ed. by F. Cameron, L. Kelly. Newcastle upon Tyne, 2010

8. Cameron F. The Liquid Museum. New Institutional Ontologies for a Complex, Uncertain World // The International Handbook of Museum Studies / ed. by A. Witcomb, K. Message. L., 2015. Vol. 1. Museum Theory.

9. Cameron F. The politics of heritage authorship: the case of digital heritage collections // New heritage, new media and cultural heritage /ed. by Y. Kalay, T. Kvan, J. Affleck. L.; N.Y., 2007.

10. Dolák J. Kritika kritické muzeologie // Muzeológia a kultúrne dediestvo. 2016. Vol. 4. Is.2.

11. Gosden Ch., Larson F. Knowing things: exploring the collections at the Pitt Rivers Museum, 1884–1945. Oxford, 2008.

12. Hill K. Women and Museums,1850–1914. Modernity and the Gendering of Knowledge. Manchester, 2016.

13. Larson F., Petch A., Zeitlyn D. Social Networks and the Creation of the Pitt Rivers Museum // Journal of Material Culture. 2007. Vol. 12. Is. 3.