Person Walking: Walkability as a Factor of Production of Urban Everyday Life

 
PIIS023620070028502-9-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070028502-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 12/1Goncharnaya Str., 109240 Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 34 Issue 5
Pages53-69
Abstract

The subject of the article is a walk as a specific practice of a person's daily life in a city, as well as the phenomenon of walkability: the feature of an environment to be suitable for a person to move on foot. The article notes that the term walkability itself is new and is used mainly in the field of Urban Studies. At the same time, the phenomenon itself — a person's walk in the space of the city — was comprehended much earlier in the context of philosophy, social theory and socio-political thought. Based on the work of Walter Benjamin, Michel de Certeau, Guy Debord, it is shown that the origin of the aimless walk is chronologically connected with the Modern era, and in terms of the organization of the habitat, it correlates with a certain stage in the development of cities. The article also analyze a number of political aspects of walkability; in particular, it is noted that the nature of power spatiality in the urban environment largely determines its accessibility / inaccessibility for pedestrians, determines the routes of a person’s movement around the city, marks the boundaries of “places of memory”, and so on. It is concluded that increasing the level and quality of walkability in modern cities is not only expedient from a utilitarian, urban planning point of view, but also politically fair in relation to a person — a resident of these cities.

Keywordsurban studies, philosophical urban studies, human and environment, freedom of movement, drift, everyday life, production of space, vernacular, walkability
Received21.11.2023
Publication date23.11.2023
Number of characters29630
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 98

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Benjamin W. Bodler [Baudelaire]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2015.

2. Benjamin W. Parizh, stolica XIX stoletiya [Paris, the Capital of the 19th Century]. Benjamin W. Ozarenija [Insights]. Transl. from French by N.M. Bernovskaya, Yu. A. Danilov, S.A. Romashko. Moscow: Martis Publ., 2000.

3. Bichurin N.Ya. Opisanie Pekina [Description of Beijing]. Transl. from Chinese. Saint-Petersburg, A. Smirdin Press Publ., 1829.

4. Breton A., Soupault Ph. Prozrachnoe zerkalo [Transparent Mirror]. Vavilon: Vestnik molodoj literatury [Babylon: Herald of Young Literature]. Transl. from French by D. Gal’, M. Osokin, O. Assovsky. Iss. 2 (18). Moscow: ARGO-RISK Publ., 1993. P. 68‒71.

5. Debord G.-E. Psihogeografiya [Psychogeography]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2017.

6. Jacobs J. Smert' i zhizn' bol'shih amerikanskih gorodov [The Death and Life of Great American Cities]. Transl from English by L. Motylev. Moscow: Novoe Izdatel'stvo Publ., 2011.

7. Zhertvy Steny [Victims of the Wall]. Berlin.de. Das offizielle Hauptstadtportal. URL: https://www.berlin.de/mauer/ru/istorija/shertwy-steny/#:~:text=С%201961%20по%201989%20год,из%20ГДР%3B%2030%20человек%20с (date of access: 27.06.2023).

8. Statement of the Public Movement “Arhnadzor”. 25.10.2011. URL: https://www.archnadzor.ru/2011/10/25/kitajskij-zabor/#more-8603 (date of access: 15.06.2023).

9. Auge M. Ot goroda voobrazhaemogo k gorodu-fikcii [From the City of Imagination to the City of Fiction]. Hudozhestvennyj zhurnal. 1999. N 24. URL: www.guelman.ru/xz/362/xx24/x2402.htm (date of access: 20.06.2023).

10. Auge M. Vvedenie v antropologiyu gipermoderna [Non-places. An Introduction to Anthropology of Hypermodern]. Transl. from French by A.Yu. Konnov. Moscow: New Literary Review Publ., 2017.

11. Certeau M., de. Izobretenie povsednevnosti [The Invention of Everyday Life]. Vol. 1. Iskusstvo delat [Art of Doing]. Transl. from French by D. Kalugin, N. Movnina. Saint Petersburg: European University at St. Petersburg Press Publ., 2013.

12. Certeau M., de. Po gorodu peshkom [Walking around the City]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. 2008. Vol. 7, N 2. P. 24–38.

13. Therborn G. Goroda vlasti. Gorod, naciya, narod, global'nost' [Cities of Power. City, Nation, People, Globality]. Transl. from English by A. Korolev, ed. by V. Danilov. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ., 2020.

14. Trubina E.G. Gorod v teorii: opyty osmysleniya prostranstva [City in Theory: Experiments of Comprehension of Space]. Moscow: New Literary Review Publ., 2010.

15. Yurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos'. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [It Was Forever until it Ended. The Last Soviet Generation]. Foreword by A. Belyaev; transl. from English. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2014.

16. Assmann A. Erinnerung, Identität, Emotionen: Die Nation neu denken. Blatter.de. März 2020. URL: https://www.blaetter.de/ausgabe/2020/maerz/erinnerung-identitaet-emotionen-die-nation-neu-denken (date of access: 20.06.2023).

17. Bartzokas-Tsiompras A., Photis Y.N. What matters when it comes to “Walk and the city”? Defining a weighted GIS-based walkability index. Transport Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 523–530.

18. Baobeid A., Koç M., Al-Ghamdi S.G. Walkability and Its Relationships With Health, Sustainability, and Livability: Elements of Physical Environment and Evaluation Frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2021. Vol. 7. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218 (date of access: 10.06.2023).

19. Bekiaris E., Tsami M., Panou M. A “Greening Mobility” framework towards sustainability. Transport Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 131–136.

20. Bischoff P. Surveillance camera statistics: which cities have the most CCTV cameras? URL: https://www.comparitech.com/vpn-privacy/the-worlds-most-surveilled-cities/ (date of access: 15.06.2023).

21. Golan Y., Wilkinson N., Henderson J.M., Weverka A. Gendered walkability: Building a daytime walkability index for women. Journal of Transport and Land Use. 2019. N 12(1). URL: https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/1472 (date of access: 12.06.2023).

22. Kärrholm M., Johansson M., Lindelöw D., Ferreira I.A. Interseriality and Different Sorts of Walking: Suggestions for a Relational Approach to Urban Walking. Mobilities. 2017. N 12:1. P. 20‒35.

23. Lefebvre H. Rhythmanalysis. Space, Time and Everyday Life. Transl. from French by: Elden S., Moore G. London, New York: Continuum, 2004.

24. Liao B., van den Berg P.E.W., van Wesemael P.J.V, Arentze T.A. How Does Walkability Change Behavior? A Comparison between Different Age Groups in the Netherlands. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. N 17(2): 540.

25. Manzelat R.R., Emadi M.I., Kamali A.J. City Sustainability: the Influence of Walkability on Built Environments. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 97–104.

26. McEwan I. A Tale of Two Cities. The Guardian. 22.10.2005. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2005/oct/22/featuresreviews.guardianreview31 (date of access: 29.06.2023).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up