Individual and Social Dimensions of Moral Stress

 
PIIS023620070027359-1-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070027359-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
National Research Mordovia State University
Tyumen Industrial University
Address: 68, Bolshevistskaya Str., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, 430005, Russian Federation; 38, Volodarsky Str., Tyumen 625000, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 34 Issue 4
Pages170-180
Abstract

The article is devoted to moral stress, which is understood as a combination of emotional reactions challenging the integrity of a system of moral norms and values, as well as a result of such an impact. Individual dimensions of moral stress are shown on the example of the analysis of the concepts of moral distress and moral injury. Using the concept of "moral resilience" as an example, approaches to overcoming moral stress are analyzed, which involve rationalizing the causes and consequences of traumatic events and changing the subject's attitude to stress factors. It is shown that these approaches manifest the therapeutic turn in culture. There is an increase in the influence of stress factors on modern life. If in the past the manifestations of moral stress were personalized and extreme, in modern times they acquire a habitual character and a collective dimension. The reason for this is the growing gap between the value system, which advocates individual well-being, and the system, aimed at the effective regulation of the social whole. The widening of this gap is associated, on the one hand, with the expansion of the space of individual freedom, on the other hand, with the extraordinary conditions of the fight against terrorism, the pandemic, etc., regulating of which requires the restriction of personal rights. The author proposes several strategies of overcoming moral stress. Defense strategies are labeled as moralization and intellectualization. The third strategy, which involves the support of individual well-being, is realized in the form of the so called "new ethics". It is concluded that to overcome moral stress, it is necessary to initiate not only internal, but also structural changes. To do this, it is necessary to go beyond the psychological interpretation of individual moral stress to broad interdisciplinary generalizations on its social causes and collective manifestations.

Keywordsmoral stress, moral distress, moral trauma, moral elasticity, therapeutic turn, collective trauma, social stress, new ethics
Received03.09.2023
Publication date03.09.2023
Number of characters28125
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 138

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Apresyan R.G. K bazovomu opredeleniyu morali [Towards a basic definition of morality]. Filosofskij zhurnal. 2014. N 1 (12). P. 78–91.

2. Badiou A. Jetika: Ocherk o soznanii Zla [Ethics: Essay on the Understanding of Evil]. St.-Petersburg: Machina Publ., 2006.

3. Hegel G.W.F. Jestetika [Aesthetics] in 4 vol. Vol. 4. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1978.

4. Kadyrov R.V., Dmitrieva O.B. Moral'naja travma: sovremennye podhody k opredeleniju ponjatija, jetiologii, diagnostike i psihoterapii [Moral injury: modern approaches to the definition of the concept, etiology, diagnostics and psychotherapy]. Vestnik KemGU. 2021. N 2 (86). P. 438–446.

5. McWilliams N. Psihoanaliticheskaja diagnostika: Ponimanie struktury lichnosti v klinicheskom processe [Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process]. Moscow: Klass Publ., 2001.

6. MacIntyre A. Posle dobrodeteli: Issledovanija teorii morali [After Virtue: Studies in Moral Theory]. Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt Publ., 2000.

7. Marcuse H. Jeros i civilizacija [Eros and Civilization]. Kiev: ISA Publ., 1995.

8. Nozdrachev D. I., Zamjatin K. A., Miroshnichenko M. D. Moral'nyj distress v palliativnoj pomoshhi detjam: klassicheskie problemy i vyzovy pandemii COVID-19 [Moral distress in palliative care for children: classic problems and challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Chelovek. 2022. Vol. 33. N 3. P. 138–158.

9. Serikov A.E. Stress i jetika samoobladanija [Stress and the ethics of self-control]. Mixtura verborum: filosofskij ezhegodnik. Samara: SGA Publ., 2015. P. 20-39.

10. Smoleva E.O. Social'nyj stress i strategii ego preodoleniya: analiz koncepcij i modelej [Social stress and coping strategies: analysis of concepts and models]. Social'noe prostranstvo. 2020. Vol. 6. N 3. P. 1–13.

11. Sztompka P. Social'noe izmenenie kak travma (stat'ja pervaja) [Social change as a trauma (article one)]. Socis. 2001. N 1. P. 6–16.

12. Bartone P. Resilience under military operational stress: can leaders influence hardiness? Military Psychology. 2006. Vol. 18. P. 131–148.

13. Carlson J., Haffenden R., Bassett G. Resilience: Theory and Application. Argonne: Argonne National Library, 2012.

14. Frezza E. E. The moral distress syndrome affecting physicians: how current healthcare is putting doctors and patients at risk. New York: Routledge, 2021.

15. Griffin B. J., Purcell.N., Burkman K. Moral Injury: An Integrative Review. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2019. Vol. 32. Issue 3. P. 350–362.

16. Jameton A. Nursing Practice: The Ethical Issues. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1984.

17. Jones-Bonofiglio K. Health Care Ethics through the Lens of Moral Distress. London: Springer, 2020.

18. Litz B. T., Stein N., Delaney E. Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review. 2009. Vol. 29. P. 695–706.

19. Moral distress and moral injury – recognising and tackling it for UK doctors. London: BMA, 2021.

20. O’Brien T. The Things They Carried. New York: Viking Penguin, 1990.

21. Rushton C. H. Moral Resilience: A Capacity for Navigating Moral Distress in Critical Care. AACN Advanced Critical Care. 2016. Vol. 27. N 1. P. 111–119.

22. Shay J. Achilles in Vietnam. New York: Atheneum, 1994.

23. Shay J. Moral injury. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 2014. Vol. 31(2). P. 182–191.

24. Webster G., Baylis F. E. Moral residue. Margin of error: The ethics of mistakes in the practice of medicine. Hagerstown: University Publishing Group, 2000. P. 217–230.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up