A Person Who is Coping, or Coping Well-Being of the Digital Generation

 
PIIS023620070027356-8-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070027356-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Address: 55 Mira Ave., 644077 Omsk, Russian Federation
Affiliation: Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Address: 55 Mira Ave., 644077 Omsk, Russian Federation
Affiliation: Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Address: 55 Mira Ave., 644077 Omsk, Russian Federation
Affiliation: Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Address: 55 Mira Ave., 644077 Omsk, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 34 Issue 4
Pages112-127
Abstract

The article provides an overview of current foreign and Russian psychological studies that reveal the relationship between socially oriented coping-behavior of a person and subjective well-being. In this case, the latter acts not only as a product, but also as a prerequisite for choosing constructive ways of coping. The discussion is built around the discussion of the factors that mediate this connection, their significance for the younger generation on the example of schoolchildren and students, the specifics of the manifestation of well-being and coping in the virtual space. Key research questions: how are well-being and coping related among modern youth and do the digital generation require new forms of coping or their virtual counterparts for well-being? The novelty is connected with the search for the specifics of coping with the difficulties of young students as representatives of the new generation, the definition of new forms of coping or the modification of existing strategies, taking into account the peculiarities of life in modern society. The question is raised about the role of network communication, Internet space in the manifestation of symptoms of trouble and signs of well-being of the Internet user's personality in situations of frustrating challenges that change the environment and conditions of students' activities. The ambiguity of the available scientific results, their dependence on the cultural context and position of the authors, as well as the reality of the risks and resources of using cyberspace by young people to cope with life's difficulties are recognized. The interconnection between subjective well-being and coping expands the possibilities for organizing targeted work with young people to improve emotional well-being and life satisfaction. Research prospects are related to the development of the "online well-being" model, its methodological, methodological and empirical support.

Keywordscoping behavior, subjective well-being, online well-being, youth, schoolchildren, students, challenges, digital environment, network communication, risks, resources
Received02.09.2023
Publication date03.09.2023
Number of characters15330
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 138

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arbuzova E.N., Semakova A.I. Ocenka psihologicheskogo sostoyaniya i resursov sovladayushchego povedeniya obuchayushchihsya obrazovatel'noj organizacii MVD Rossii v usloviyah samoizolyacii [Assessment of the psychological state and resources of coping behavior of students of the educational organization of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in conditions of self-isolation]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2020. N 3(87). P. 218–226.

2. Belinskaya E.P. Vzaimosvyaz' real'noj i virtual'noj identichnostej pol'zovatelej social'nyh setej [Relationship between real and virtual identities of social network users]. Obrazovanie lichnosti. 2016. N 2. P. 31–39.

3. Borisova I.V. Vzaimosvyaz' psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya i koping-povedeniya studentov [Relationship between psychological well-being and coping behavior of students]. Problemy psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoj zaochnoj nauchnoj konferencii, Ekaterinburg, 19 marta 2021 g. Ekaterinburg: Ural'skij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet Publ., 2021. P. 88–92.

4. Vasil'eva I.V., CHumakov M.V., CHumakova D.M., Bulatova O.V. Sub"ektivnoe blagopoluchie studentov psihologo-pedagogicheskih napravlenij v period epidemii COVID-19 [Subjective Well-Being of Psychological and Pedagogical Students during the COVID-19 Epidemic]. Obrazovanie i nauka. 2021. N 23 (10). P.129–154.

5. Veselova E.K., Korzhova E.YU., Rudyhina O.V., Anisimova T.V. Social'naya podderzhka kak resurs obespecheniya sub"ektivnogo blagopoluchiya studencheskoj molodezhi [Social support as a resource for ensuring the subjective well-being of students]. Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo. 2021. Vol.12, N 1. P. 44–58.

6. Gerasimova A.A., Holmogorova A.B. Strategii sovladaniya, psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie i problemnoe ispol'zovanie interneta v period pandemii [Coping Strategies, Psychological Well-Being, and Problematic Internet Use During the Pandemic]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2020. Vol. 25, N 6. P. 31–40.

7. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Stepanova M.A. Otnoshenie shkol'nikov k vynuzhdennomu distancionnomu obucheniyu: svyaz' s vnutrennej motivaciej i udovletvorennost'yu shkoloj [Attitude of schoolchildren to forced distance learning: connection with intrinsic motivation and school satisfaction]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2022. Vol. 27, N 6. P. 46–56.

8. Il'ina V.V., Molchanova L.N. Osobennosti koping- povedeniya studentov, sklonnyh k internet-zavisimosti [Features of coping behavior of students prone to Internet addiction]. Kollekciya gumanitarnyh issledovanij. 2019. N 5 (20). P. 27–34.

9. Kislyakov P.A., SHmeleva E.A., Meerson I.-L.S. Psihologicheskaya bezopasnost' i kommunikativnye trudnosti prepodavatelej i studentov pri dlitel'nom onlajn-obuchenii [Psychological safety and communication difficulties of teachers and students during long-term online learning]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2023. Vol.32, N. 1. P. 148–168.

10. Kolmogorova A.V. Ispol'zovanie tekstov zhanra «internet-otkrovenie» v kontekste resheniya zadach sentiment-analiza [The use of texts of the "Internet revelation" genre in the context of solving the problems of sentiment analysis]. Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikaciya. 2019. Vol. 17, N 3. P. 71–82.

11. Korzun S.A., Nifontova T.A. Vzaimosvyaz' sub"ektivnogo blagopoluchiya i sovladayushchego povedeniya u studentov [Relationship between subjective well-being and coping behavior among students]. Nauchnye trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshej shkoly. Istoricheskie i psihologo-pedagogicheskie nauki. 2019. N 19–3. P. 179–186.

12. Kulikov L.V., Malenova A.YU., Potapova YU.V. Psihologicheskij kibermetricheskij analiz semantiki sovladaniya s trudnostyami [Psychological cybermetric analysis of the semantics of coping with difficulties]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Ser.: «Psihologiya». 2021. N 4. P. 27–34.

13. Kulikov L.V., Malenova A.YU., Potapova YU.V. Internet-predpochteniya studentov srednih special'nyh i vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij s raznym urovnem sub"ektivnogo blagopoluchiya [Internet Preferences of Students of Secondary Specialized and Higher Educational Institutions with Different Levels of Subjective Well-Being]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2022. N 1. P. 27.

14. Kryukova T.L., Saporovskaya M.V., Hazova S.A. Sovladanie s trudnostyami i zhiznennyj stil' sovremennika [Coping with difficulties and the lifestyle of a contemporary]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser.: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sociokinetika. 2017. N 1. P.91–96.

15. Makenova N. Generation «A»: instrukciya k primeneniyu i obucheniyu pervogo tekhnologicheskogo pokoleniya [Generation «A»: instructions for the use and training of the first technological generation]. Forbes.ru Forbes magazine. 2020 [Electronic resource]. URL: forbes.ru/forbeslife/404011-generation-instrukciya-k-primeneniyu-i-obucheniyu-pervogo-tehnologicheskogo (date of access: 15.08.2022).

16. Malenova A.YU. Kommunikativnye osobennosti lichnosti i koping-povedeniya aktivnyh i neaktivnyh Internet-pol'zovatelej [Communicative Personality Features and Coping Behavior of Active and Inactive Internet Users]. Nasilie v obrazovatel'noj srede, sem'e, obshchestve: prichiny, indikatory, posledstviya. Omsk: Izd-vo Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2017. P. 152–163.

17. Mnogosmyslova A.A. Vzaimosvyaz' koping-strategij i internet-zavisimosti cheloveka [The relationship of coping strategies and Internet addiction of a person]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2020. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 52.

18. Nikol'skaya O.B., Fomina L.B., SHklyaev V.V., Karataeva T.YU. Osobennosti sovladayushchego povedeniya u studentok s razlichnym urovnem agressivnosti pri obuchenii v usloviyah samoizolyacii [Peculiarities of Coping Behavior in Female Students with Different Levels of Aggression when Studying in Self-Isolation Conditions]. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2020. Vol. 8, N 5. P. 11.

19. Regush L.A., Alekseeva E.V., Veretina O.R., Orlova A.V., Pezhemskaya YU.S. Internet kak resurs sovladaniya s psihologicheskimi problemami u podrostkov i molodezhi [Internet kak resurs sovladaniya s psihologicheskimi problemami u podrostkov i molodezhi]. Psihologiya cheloveka v obrazovanii. 2021. Vol. 3, N 2. P. 196–207.

20. Samohvalova A.G., Shipova N.S., Tihomirova E.V., Vishnevskaya O.N. Psihologicheskoe blagopoluchie sovremennyh studentov: tipologiya i misheni psihologicheskoj pomoshchi [Psychological well-being of modern students: typology and targets of psychological assistance]. Konsul'tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya. 2022. Vol. 30, N 1. P. 29–48

21. Skorynin A.A. K probleme otrazheniya psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti v cifrovom prostranstve [On the problem of reflecting the psychological well-being of a person in the digital space]. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Pedagogika i psihologiya. 2022. N. 9. P. 58–65

22. Sobkin V.S., Fedotova A.V. Podrostok v social'nyh setyah: k voprosu o social'no-psihologicheskom samochuvstvii [A teenager in social networks: on the issue of socio-psychological well-being]. Nacional'nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2018. N 3(31). P. 23–26.

23. Soldatova G. U., Vojskunskij A. E. Social'no-kognitivnaya koncepciya cifrovoj socializacii: novaya ekosistema i social'naya evolyuciya psihiki [Socio-cognitive concept of digital socialization: a new ecosystem and the social evolution of the psyche]. Psihologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki. 2021. N 18(3). P. 431–450.

24. Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I. Lichnostnye harakteristiki i psihologicheskaya samoregulyaciya studentov onlajn i oflajn: nekotorye osobennosti cifrovoj social'nosti [Personal characteristics and psychological self-regulation of students online and offline: some features of digital sociality]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya. 2023. N 1. P24-37.

25. Chebotareva E.YU. Kross-kul'turnye osobennosti koping-strategij rossijskih i francuzskih studentov v kontekste psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya [Cross-cultural features of coping strategies of Russian and French students in the context of psychological well-being]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Ser.: Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psihologiya razvitiya. 2018. Iss. 7, N 2. P. 156–163.

26. YAshchenko E.F., Lazorak O.V. Koping-strategii i akcentuacii haraktera studentov-pervokursnikov s raznym urovnem sub"ektivnogo blagopoluchiya [Coping strategies and character accentuations of first-year students with different levels of subjective well-being]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2020. Vol. 22, N 4. P. 1040–1049.

27. Ahn D., Shin D.-H. Is the social use of media for seeking connectedness or for avoiding social isolation? Mechanisms underlying media use and subjective well-being. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013. N 29. P. 2453–2462.

28. Back М.D., Stopfer J.M., Vazire S., Gaddis S., Schmukle S.C., Egloffi B., Gosling S.D. Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not SelfIdealization. Psychological Science. 2010. N 3. Р. 372–374.

29. Bakracheva M. Coping Effects on Life Meaning, Basic Psychological Needs and Well-Being. Psychology. 2019. N 10. Р. 1375–1395.

30. Carpenter J. M., Green M. C., LaFlam J. People or profiles: Individual differences in online social networking use. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. N 50. Р. 538–541.

31. Chou H.-T. G., Edge N. «They are happier and having better lives than I am»: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2012. N 15. Р. 117–121.

32. Clark J.L., Algoe S.B., Green M.C. Social network sites and well-being: the role of social connection. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018. N 27(1). Р. 32–37.

33. Deters F.G., Mehl M.R. Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological & Personality Science. 2013. N 4. Р. 579–586.

34. Diener E., Lucas R. E., Oishi S. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology. 2018. N 4(1). P.15.

35. Fischer R., Scheunemann J. Moritz S. Coping Strategies and Subjective Well-being: Context Matters. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2021. N 22. P.3413–3434.

36. Freire C., Ferradás M.d.M., Núñez J.C., Valle, A., Vallejo G. Eudaimonic Well-Being and Coping with Stress in University Students: The Mediating/Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019. N 16. P. 48.

37. Freire C., Ferradás M.M, Valle A., Núñez J.C., Vallejo G. Profiles of Psychological Well-being and Coping Strategies among University Students. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016. N 7. P. 1554.

38. Haferkamp N., Krämer N. C. Social comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2011. N 14. P. 309–314.

39. Henriksson F., Lindén E. K., Schad E. Well-being and stress among upper secondary school pupils in Sweden. Psychology in Russia: State of the art. 2019. Vol. 12, N 4. P. 172–195.

40. Howe N., Strauss W. Generftions: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Company, 1991.

41. Kearns A., Whitley E. Associations of internet access with social integration, wellbeing and physical activity among adults in deprived communities: evidence from a household survey. BMC Public Health. 2019. N 19. P. 860.

42. Lee K.-T., Noh M.-J., Koo D.-M. Lonely people are no longer lonely on social networking sites: The mediating role of self-disclosure and social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2013. N 16. P. 413–418.

43. Ong ZX, Dowthwaite L, Perez Vallejos E, Rawsthorne M and Long Y Measuring Online Wellbeing: A Scoping Review of Subjective Wellbeing Measures. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. 12:616637.

44. Shepherd R.-M., Edelmann R.J. Reasons for internet use and social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005. N 39. P. 949–958

45. Stevenson J.C., Millings A., Emerson L.M. Psychological Well-being and Coping: the Predictive Value of Adult Attachment, Dispositional Mindfulness, and Emotion Regulation. Mindfulness. 2019. N 10. P. 256–271.

46. Teppers E., Luyckx K. A., Klimstra T., Goossens L. Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: A longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect. Journal of Adolescence. 2014. N 37. P. 691–699.

47. Verduyn P., Ybarra O,. Resibois M., Jonides J., Kross E. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2017. N 11(1). P. 274–302

48. Zach S., Lissitsa S. Internet and leisure time physical activity of adults – a nationwide survey. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. N 60. P. 483–491.

49. Zillien D., Hargittai E. Digital distinction: status-specific types of internet usage. Social Sciences Quarterly. 2009. N 90(2). P. 274–91.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up