Sovereign Personality: Experience in Mainstreaming and Conceptualizing the Term

The article presents theoretical experience in solving the socio-philosophical problem of actualization and conceptualization of the term of “sovereign personality”. The author addresses the work of theorists of individual autonomy, who dealt with the problem of the philosophy of freedom, from the age of Enlightenment to the end of the 20th century. These works reveal two different approaches to understanding the sovereignty of the individual: egalitarian, combining social ideas of freedom and equality, and elitist, which is a variant of the theory of exclusive sovereignty. The article substantiates and presents the socio-philosophical formula of sovereignty, based on the three-component composition of individual freedoms and enriched by the theory of self-determination of a person as an exclusive subject of decision. The author sees significant differences between the concepts of “overeign personality” and “autonomous personality” for this formula. On the example of the discourse on autonomy and the historical and philosophical solution to the problem of defining the concept of “liberty”, fundamentally subordinative relations between sovereignty and autonomy of the individual are revealed. As a theoretical and methodological tool, the concept of “anthropological type” is introduced, which is necessary for understanding the sovereign personality as a specific type, as a kind of anthropological ideal, which has the freedom of maneuver in the development of individual tasks with the aim of freely transforming the world (H. von Keiserling) and following a certain existential code (E. Junger). The development of the theoretical foundations of the principle of sovereignty of the individual is considered by the author as a necessary initial phase of socio-philosophical research relevant in the light of the threats posed to human freedom by the merger of power deprived of humanistic potential and the latest control technologies.

Keywords

sovereign personality; autonomy of personality; anthropological type; anthropological ideal; three concepts of liberty; libertarianism; anarchism

Received

28.03.2023

Publication date

30.03.2023

Number of characters

44285

Cite

GOST	Viazinkin A. “Sovereign Personality”: Experience in Mainstreaming and Conceptualizing the Term // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 1 C. 149-172 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070024902-9-1 (circulation date: 12.12.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070024902-9
MLA	Viazinkin, Aleksei Yu "“Sovereign Personality”: Experience in Mainstreaming and Conceptualizing the Term." Chelovek 34.1 (2023):149-172. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070024902-9
APA	Viazinkin A. (2023). “Sovereign Personality”: Experience in Mainstreaming and Conceptualizing the Term. Chelovek 34(1), pp.149-172 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070024902-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 414

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Belkovich R.Yu. Krov' patriotov. Vvedenie v intellektual'nuju istoriju amerikanskogo radikalizma [Patriot blood. Introduction to the intellectual history of American radicalism]. St.-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal ' Publ., 2020.

2. Berlin I. Filosofija svobody. Evropa [Philosophy of Freedom. Europe.]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2001.

3. Boaz D. Libertarianstvo: Istorija, principy, politika [Libertarianism: History, principles, politics]. Chelyabinsk: Socium, Cato Institute Publ., 2004.

4. Braudel F. Chto takoe Francija? Kn. pervaja: Prostranstvo i istorija [What is France? Vol. first: Space and history]. Moscow: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovyh Publ., 1994.

5. Viazinkin A. Yu. Problema suverennoj lichnosti: istoriko-filosofskij aspect [The problem of a sovereign individual: the historical and philosophical aspect]. Filosofija v sovremennom mire [Philosophy in the modern world]. Collection of articles of the VI scientific readings of the Tambov regional branch of the Russian Philosophical Society. Tambov, 2021. P. 21–29.

6. Dorofeev D. Ju. Suverennaja i geterogennaja spontannost'. Filosofsko-antropologicheskij analiz [Sovereign and heterogeneous spontaneity. Philosophical and anthropological analysis]. St.-Petersburg: SPbGU Publ., 2007.

7. Dorofeev D.Ju. Suverennyj geroj v russkoj literature XIX veka: filosofsko-antropologicheskij analiz [The sovereign hero in the Russian literature of XIXth century: philosophical and anthropological analysis]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. 2008. N 4. P. 127–135.

8. Dorofeev D.Ju. Pod znakom filosofskoj antropologii. Spontannost' i suverennost' v klassichekoj i sovremennoj filosofii [Under the sign of philosophical anthropology. Spontaneity and sovereignty in classical and modern philosophy]. Moscow, St-Petersburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ Publ., 2012.

9. Keyserling H. Putevoj dnevnik filosofa [Travel diary of the philosopher]. St.-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal' Publ., 2010.

10. Kant I. Sobr. sochinenij: v 6 t. Vol. 6. [Collected works: in 6 vols.]. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1966.

11. Lefort C. Politicheskie ocherki (XIX–XX veka) [Political essays (XIX–XX centuries)]. Moscow: ROSSPЕN Publ., 2000.

12. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Chelovek suverennyj: psihologicheskoe issledovanie subjekta v ego bytii [A sovereign man: a psychological study of a subject in his existence]. St.-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2008.

13. Nietzsche F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 13 t. Vol. 5. [Complete collected works: in 13 vols.]. Moscow: Kul'turnaja revoljucija Publ., 2012.

14. Novgorodtsev P. Politicheskie idealy Drevnego i Novogo mira [Political ideals of the Ancient and New World]. Moscow: URSS Publ., 2021.

15. Pankratiev V.V. Fenomen suverennoj lichnosti: interpretacija filosofskih idej M. Shtirnera i F. Nicshe [Phenomenon of the sovereign personality: interpretation of the philosophical ideas of M. Shtirner and F. Nietzsche]. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel'stvo Burjatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., 2006.

16. Rozanov V. Sobranie sochinenij. Literaturnye izgnanniki. Kniga vtoraja [Collected works. Literary exiles. Second book]. Moscow: Respublika; St.- Petersburg, Rostok Publ., 2010.

17. Rothbard M. K novoj svobode. Libertarianskij manifest [For a New Liberty. The Libertarian Manifesto]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvо Publ., 2009.

18. Rothbard M. Jekonomicheskaja mysl': v 2 t. Vol. 1. [Economic thought: in 2 vols.]. Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Socium Publ., 2020.

19. Taylor Ch. Chto ne tak s negativnoj svobodoj? [What's wrong with negative freedom?]. Logos. 2013. N 2(92). P. 187–207.

20. Frolov E.D. Benzhamen Konstan i rozhdenie sovremennoj koncepcii antichnogo grazhdanskogo obshhestva [Benjamin Constant and the birth of the modern concept of ancient civil society]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 2. Istorija. 2011. Vyp. 3. P. 50–61.

21. Schmitt C. Politicheskaja teologija [Political theology]. Moscow: KANON-press-C Publ., 2000.

22. Junger E. Jevmesvil' [Eumesville]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2013.

23. Junger E. Uhod v Les [Going to the Forest]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2020.

24. Butler A.C. Josiah Warren and the Sovereignty of the Individual. The Journal of Libertarian Studies. Fall 1980. Vol. IV, N 4. P. 433–448.

25. Cogitations from Albert Jay Nock. Irvington-on-Hudson, New York: The Nockian Society, 1985.

26. Cohen G.A. Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

27. Ilievski N.L. The Individual Sovereignty: Conceptualization and Manifestation. Journal of Liberty & International Affairs, 2015. N 1(2). P. 23–38.

28. Rothbard M. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press, 1998.

29. The Practical Anarchist: Writings of Josiah Warren. New York: Fordham University Press, 2011.

30. Thrasher J. Self-Ownership as Personal Sovereignty. Social Philosophy and Policy. 2019. N 36(2). P. 116–133.

31. Viazinkin A.Y. The Concept of Sovereign Individual as a Topical Historical-Philosophical and Humanitarian Problem. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Proceedings of the First International Volga Region Conference on Economics, Humanities and Sports (FICEHS-19). Atlantis Press, 2020. Vol. 114. P. 401–404.