Biohacking: Changing Yourself to Reformat Science

Occupation: Researcher at the Department of Humanitarian Expertise and Bioethics
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Kirill A. Petrov

Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation:
Volgograd State Medical University
Volgograd Medical Research Center
Address: 1 Pavshikh Bortsov Sq., Volgograd 400131, Russian Federation

Asya A. Filatova

Affiliation: Don State Technical University
Address: 1 Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don 344000, Russian Federation

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 32 Issue №6

Pages

58-73

Abstract

Тoday the term «biohacking» is used in two main meanings. First, as a part of «garage science» movement, whose members experiment in home laboratories with self-created required equipment. Secondly, as the human enhancement practices aimed at improving the quality of life and the struggle for immortality. In the article, we show the integrity of these two seemingly unrelated aspects. For this purpose we use Fuller's post-truth concept, which allows us to analyze biohacking in the context of the more general processes of science democratization and the ongoing changes in the knowledge and power distribution system. The article refers to the conceptual metaphors of lions and foxes, which traditionally distinguish two types of elites. According to this division we consider biohackers as «fox strategists». Lion's conservatism implies status quo maintaining of order power/knowledge apportionment. The foxes try to change the order by questioning the «rules of the game». We demonstrate the joining of do-it-yourself ideology and «care of the self» principles by the case of biohackers interaction at the reddit.com forum, and its section dealing with transcranial direct current stimulation devices. The analysis of this case allows to identify biohackers strategies for academic science boundaries eroding, especially, science and non-science boundaries, individual scientific disciplines and «national sciences». Authors conclude that biohackers can be considered as philosophers of science. In this framework their practices of «personal science» and precedents creating represent the process of rethinking both the essence of science and its rules.

Keywords

philosophy of science, bio-and neurohacking, garage science, post-truth, Steve Fuller, lions and foxes, biopolitics, care of the self, protestant science, creative destruction

Received

29.12.2021

Publication date

27.12.2021

Number of characters

26979

Cite

GOST	Shevchenko S., Petrov K., Filatova A. Biohacking: Changing Yourself to Reformat Science // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №6 C. 58-73 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070018008-5-1 (circulation date: 17.09.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070018008-5
MLA	Shevchenko, Sergei Y, Petrov, Kirill A, Filatova, Asya A "Biohacking: Changing Yourself to Reformat Science." Chelovek 32.6 (2021):58-73. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070018008-5
APA	Shevchenko S., Petrov K., Filatova A. (2021). Biohacking: Changing Yourself to Reformat Science. Chelovek 32(6), pp.58-73 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070018008-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1126

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Biohaking — novyj vyzov sisteme zdravoohranenija. [Biohacking — a new challenge to the healthcare system]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://ac.gov.ru/news/page/biohaking---novyj-vyzov-sisteme-zdravoohranenia-22721 (date of access: 01.06.2021)

2. Voronin A.A., Kiseleva M.S., Kijashhenko L.P., Judin B.G. Transdisciplinarnost' v filosofii i nauke. Materialy kruglogo stola [Transdisciplinarity in philosophy and science. Round table discussion material]. Chelovek. 2016. N 6. P. 5–19.

3. Kalanov G., Dubkovskaja V. Trejdery s Reddit razorjajut shortistov na akcijah GameStop. Chto proishodit? [Reddit Traders ruins shortly players on GameStop shares. What is going on?] [Electronic resource]. URL: https://quote.rbc.ru/news/article/601281b09a7947c3df186842 (date of access: 01.06.2021)

4. Lavrentyeva S.V. Praktiki DIY elektroctimuljacii mozga kak primer dejstvija nezavershennoj nomologicheskoj mashiny [Practice diy brain electrical stimulation as an example of an incomplete nomological machine]. Riski biotehngologicheskogo uluchshenija cheloveka: nejrotehnologii i jetika. Moscow: MosGU Publ., 2019. P. 51–60.

5. Ogurcov A.P. Disciplinarnaja struktura nauki. Ee genezis i obosnovanie. [Disciplinary structure of science. Its genesis and substantiation] Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1988.

6. Petrov K.A. Kartografiruja raznoglasija v nejronaukah: plastichnyj mozg i «anekdoticheskie dannye» [Mapping controversies in neuroscience: the plastic brain and “anecdotal data”]. Sociologija vlasti. 2020. Vol. 32, Ν 2. P. 183–207.

7. Petrov K.A. Transkranial'naja mikropoljarizacija: ocenki effektivnosti TKMP-ustrojstv pol'zovateljami i uchenymi. [Transcranial direct current stimulation: effectiveness evaluating of TDCS-devices in amateurs' and scientists' practices] Bioetika i social'naja ocenka tehnologii. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Moscow: INION Publ. 2020. P. 126–131.

8. Sokolova E.K., Shevchenko S. Ju. Tipologija znanija v biohakinge. [A Typology of Knowledge in Biohacking] Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2020. N 1. P. 62–79.

9. Stepin V. S. Idealy i normy nauki. [Ideals and norms of science] Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://iphlib.ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH4b37a6d17a2f780a5fb64b (date of access: 01.06.2021)

10. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura, istoricheskaja evoljucija [Theoretical knowledge. Structure, historical evolution]. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija Publ, 2000.

11. Fuller S. Postpravda: Znanie kak bor'ba za vlast', [Post-Truth. Knowledge as a Power Game, transl. from English] Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2021.

12. Chugunov A. Biohakery: molekuljarnaja biologija v stile «sdelaj sam» [Biohackers: molecular biology in Do-It-Yourself style]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://biomolecula.ru/articles/biokhakery-molekuliarnaia-biologiia-v-stile-sdelai-sam (date of access: 01.06.2021.

13. Bolton R., Thomas R. Biohackers: The Science, Politics, and Economics of Synthetic Biology. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization. 2014. Vol 9. P. 213–219.

14. Davis N. J., Koningsbruggen M. G. “Non-invasive” brain stimulation is not non-invasive. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2013. Vol. 7. P. 1–4.

15. Fuller S. The Academic Ceasar: University Leadership is Hard. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publishing, 2016.

16. Jasanoff Sh. Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science. Minerva. 2003. Vol. 41, N 3. P. 223–244.

17. Markham A. N. Fieldwork in Social Media. What Would Malinowski Do? Qualitative Communication Research. 2013. Vol. 2, N. 4. P. 434–446.

18. Massanari A. L. Participatory culture community, and play: learning from reddit. New York, Bern, Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 2015.

19. Oreskes N., Conway E. M. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury, 2011.

20. Peterchev A.V., Wagner T.A., Miranda P.C. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection and reporting practices. Brain stimulation. 2012. N 5. P. 435–453.