Rawls and the Meritocracy Controversy

 
PIIS023620070015650-2-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070015650-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Research Fellow of Department of Social Philosophy
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 32 Issue №3
Pages116-124
Abstract

The article examines the views on justice of the American philosopher D. Rawls in the context of his polemics with the theories of meritocracy. It is noted that the Western society of the first post-war decades is precisely a meritocratic society in which the corresponding concepts arise. At the same time, thanks to the work of the British sociologist and politician M. Young, a critical tradition in understanding meritocracy has been formed. D. Rawls follows this tradition, arguing that the formulation of his principles of justice does not lead to a meritocratic society. From Rawls ' point of view, meritocracy socially and culturally impoverishes the lower class and as such aims to bring prosperity to the technocratic elite. At the same time, Rawls thinks pragmatically, not completely rejecting the idea of a “merit society” but trying to put it at the service of “the least successful”. The article also shows that modern Western society is largely anti-Rawlsian, due to the high concentration of wealth and the formed hypermeritocracy. Therefore, it is no accident that representatives of the intellectual elite of Western societies are extremely concerned about the problem of inequality today, and in general, this situation of inequality makes the concept of Rawls very relevant.

KeywordsRawls, theory of justice, meritocracy, M. Young, D. Bell, T. Piketty, modern society, inequality
Received29.06.2021
Publication date29.06.2021
Number of characters17008
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 702

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Atkinson E.B. Neravenstvo. Kak s nim byt’? [Inequality. What can be done?]. Moscow: Delo Publ., 2018.

2. Bauman Z. Retrotopiya [Retrotopia]. Moscow: VCIOM Publ., 2019.

3. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniya [The Coming of PostIndustrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting]. Moscow: Academia Publ., 2004.

4. Kollier P. Budushchee kapitalizma [The Future of Capitalism: Facing the New Anxieties]. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ., 2021.

5. Mal'cev G.V. Burzhuaznyi egalitarizm: evolyutsiya predstavlenii o sotsial’nom ravenstve v mire kapitala [Bourgeois egalitarianism: The evolution of ideas about social equality in the world of capital]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1984.

6. Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the twenty-first century]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2015.

7. Rawls J. Teoriya spravedlivosti [A Theory of Justice]. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk St. Univ. Publ., 1995.

8. Fedotova V.G. Khoroshee obshchestvo [Good society]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition Publ., 2005.

9. Young M. The Rise of the Meritocracy. An Essay on Education and Equality. London: Penguin Books, 1961.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up