Все
 
 
 


Dzungar: religion and designation
 
Код статьиS086919080025827-6-1
DOI10.31857/S086919080025827-6
Тип публикации Статья
Статус публикации Опубликовано
Авторы
Китинов Баатр Учаевич 
Должность: ведущий научный сотрудник
Аффилиация: Института востоковедения РАН
Адрес: Москва, Российская Федерация, Москва
Люлина Анастасия Геннадьевна
Должность: доцент кафедры иностранных языков
Аффилиация:
Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса Лумумбы
Институт востоковедения РАН
Адрес: Москва, Российская Федерация
Название журналаВосток. Афро-Азиатские общества: история и современность
ВыпускВыпуск 3
Страницы173-184
Аннотация

The origin of the term ‘Dzungar’ (also known as ‘Jungar’, ‘Zhungar’, ‘Zünghar’, ‘Zungar’) has already received general consideration, but it is still not clear, which events contributed to the first use of the term, and what it could actually mean. Its etymology needs further study. The traditional version does not go beyond the definition of the Dzungars as the “left wing” of the military-administrative division of the Oirats, and claims that the term first appeared in the beginning of the 17th c. However, the main factors and reasons of its usage for the nation’s self-designation and state formation require further clarification. In present research we consider the religious factor of consolidation and self-identification of the Dzungars. The aim of the article is to determine the conditions, causes and time of the occurrence and sustaining of the name Dzungar. Our tasks include: 1) studying the influence of related events and processes, such as Oirats migration (from Western Mongolia and the Northern part of future Dzungaria to Siberian rivers); separation of the Elets; appearance of the Derbets and the rise of Choros clan; adoption of Buddhism and the role of Geluk lamas and Dzungar leaders in the actualization of the people names as Choros and Dzungars; 2) identification of the religious factor in the emergence of the Dzungars and its subsequent influence for Manchus’ policy towards them; 3) definition of the mechanism of the Dzungars’ self-identification and the etymology of the term.

Ключевые словаDzungars, Elets, Choros, etymology, left wing, migration, ethnonym, Geluk, Buddhism, Manchus.
Получено19.06.2023
Дата публикации02.07.2023
Кол-во символов27482
Цитировать  
100 руб.
При оформлении подписки на статью или выпуск пользователь получает возможность скачать PDF, оценить публикацию и связаться с автором. Для оформления подписки требуется авторизация.

Оператором распространения коммерческих препринтов является ООО «Интеграция: ОН»

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной.

Оглавление

Traditional interpretation: Left Wing
Elet Oirats: Choros and Derbets
Migrations specify origin of Dzungars
Buddhism and the development of the Dzungars
Religion and fate of the Oirats
Dzungars and Manchus
Conclusion
Abbreviations
1

Traditional interpretation: Left Wing
2 The word Dzungar is usually translated from Mongolian as “left wing”. The steppe nomads since ancient times have been divided into left and right wings. The situation was the same under Genghis Khan. After the fall of the Mongol Yuan dynasty, Dayan Khagan (c. 1480? – 1543) have changed the system of governance and leadership among the Eastern Mongols: he re-created the left (Chakhars, Khalkhas and Uriankhai) and right (Tumets, Harachins and Ordos) wings [Sneath, 2010, p. 395–396]. The Oirats (Four Oirats) were not included in those wings, so the definition of the Mongols appeared as “six and four” (earlier – “forty and four” [Vladimirtsov, 2002, p. 429]).
3 Vladimirtsov noticed that the separation among the Oirats into right and left wings “... had developed as an imitation of the Eastern Mongols” [Vladimirtsov, 2002, p. 443]. It is believed that it appeared at the beginning of 15th c., when the Four Oirats were divided into two “hands”: Züün Gar (eastern/left hand) and Baruun Gar (western/right hand) [Natsagdorj, Ochir, 2010, p. 524]. According to Elverskog the Dzungars (as the left wing) already existed at the time of Toghon and Esen in the first half of the 15th c. [Elverskog, 2003, p. 109]. These authors did not indicate the sources they used for their conclusions.
4 Crossley attributes the appearance of the term Dzungar (in the form of jegün ghar) to the middle of the first third of the 17th c. at the times of Dayan Khagan and explains its active use by the desire of the Oirats to emphasize their Mongolian identity, when faced with pressure from the Manchus [Crossley, 2006, p. 73–74]. Atwood’s opinion is almost the same: Dzungars as a tribal name appeared early in the 17th c. The term itself, he believes, arose as a way of distinguishing themselves from their relatives, the Derbets, since “the Zünghars were the Dörböds to the east [of other Oirats]” [Atwood, 2004, p. 621]. Taupier also believes that at the beginning of 17th c. there was The Greater Dorbod ulus, consisting of two polities headed by the Choros clan [Taupier, 2014, p. 94]. Atwood’s opinion was criticized by Beckwith, but the latter did not come to a definite conclusion, paying more attention to the criticism of traditional interpretation of the word “Dzungar” [Beckwith, 2007, p. 41]. Earlier Uspensky wrote about the understanding of the Dzungars as the “left hand”: “... then (under Genghis Khan. – B.K., A.L.) and now, each clan or aimag had its own Tszung-gar or left wing; in this case, we would have to find a lot of Zhungars, at least in administrative nomenclature” [Uspensky, 1880, p. 75–76]. Thus, the etymology of the term Dzungar as the administrative concept of “left hand” has been questioned by scholars starting with the previous century.
5

Elet Oirats: Choros and Derbets
6 The ancestors of the Dzungars should be considered the Elets, headed by the Choros clan.
7 Ogeleds [Ögeled, Elets] were named by Sagan Setsen among the early Oirats along with Baatut [Baγatud], Khoits [Xoyid] and Kerguds [Kergüd] peoples [Saγang, 1990, p. 47]. The inclusion of the greater part of the Elets in 1437–1438 into the Oirats under Toghon (d. 1439), who headed Choros clan, contributed to the formation of the Early Oirat confederation (1430s – the end of the 15th c.) [The Story of Kho Orluk, 2016, p. 25–26].
8 The question of Choros’ origin arose in various publications [Avlyaev, 2002, p. 174; Taupier, 2014, p. 19–23, 30–33]. The term “Choros” (čoro) denoted the elite of the society. In the early Turkic state formations it was the name of the leaders, later it became an ethnonym. How did the Choros manage to take a leading position among the Oirats? Chinese sources give a definite answer. In the “Clan Tables'” of “Xin Yuanshi” and in “Qing shi gao” the Choros line goes back to Bohan (孛罕) with the generic title Wuluodai (兀罗带氏). Another transliteration of 兀罗带 is 兀鲁特 “wulute”, which is correlates with “Elute”, “Elet”. Bohan ruled the left tumen (左手万户) [New History of Yuan; Zhao, 1927]. Choros and Elets were in the roots of these Oirats.
9 The reign of the Choros in the second half of the 15th c. was finished by the socio-political crisis of the First Confederation, with the exodus of a significant part of the Elets “to the west” (to Mogulistan, then known as Kyzylbashi) and their subsequent extermination [Kitinov, 2017].
10 Experts [Okada, 1987, p. 201; Atwood, 2004, p. 150] associate the origins of the Dzungars’ leaders (as well as the Derbets’) with the Choros. Derbet rulers were descendants of Esen’s eldest son – Boro-Nakhal1, while the Dzungarian rulers were descendants of Esen’s younger son Esmet-Darkhan-noyon, or Ash-Timur [Bichurin, 1829, p. 262; Zhang, He, 1895, p. 137; Zhao, 1927; Gaban, 2003, p. 89]. 1.
11 According to the description of the outer lands in “Qing shi gao”, the Derbets and the Dzungars had the same generic name Choros2, but the source does not indicate the time of their separation. Sanchirov believed: the Derbets and the Dzungars came out of the Elets in the first half of the 17th c. [Sanchirov, 2016, p. 228]. Due to the mentioned exodus to Mogulistan, Zlatkin’s opinion looks more correct: the Derbets stood out from the Choros by the beginning of the second half of the 15th c. [Zlatkin, 1983, p. 45]. In the second half of the 15th c. the Elets split into at least two parts, belonging to mentioned brothers, who did not get along with each other [Serruys, 1977, p. 378]. 2. “Oirats (Elutes) in ancient times were divided into 4 tribes: Khoshuts from the Borjigin clan; Dzungars and Derbets from the Choros clan; Torguts of unknown clan” [Zhao, 1927, Liezhuan 309].

Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 159

Оценка читателей: голосов 0 

1. Авляев Г.О. Происхождение калмыцкого народа (середина IX – первая четверть XVIII вв.). Элиста: Калмыцкое книжное издательство, 2002.
2. Архив внешней политики Российской империи (АВПРИ). Ф. 62. Оп. 62/1. Д. 11. 1732.
3. Бартольд В.В. Очерк истории Семиречья. Верный, 1898.
4. Батьянова Е. П. Род и община у телеутов в XIX – начале XXI века. М.: Наука, 2007.
5. Бичурин Н.Я. Описание Чжуньгарии и Восточного Туркестана в древнем и нынешнем состоянии. СПб.: Типография Карла Крайя, 1829.
6. Богоявленский С.К. Материалы по истории калмыков в первой половине XVII века. Исторические записки. № 5. М., 1939. С. 48–102.
7. Владимирцов Б.Я. Работы по истории и этнографии монгольских народов. М.: Восточная литература, 2002.
8. Габан Ш. Сказание об ойратах. Лунный свет. Калмыцкие историко-литературные памятники. Элиста: Калмыцкое книжное издательство, 2003. С. 84–107.
9. Джамбадорджи. Хрустальное зерцало. История в трудах ученых лам. М.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2005. С. 62–154.
10. История дурбэн-ойратов. Письменные памятники по истории ойратов XVII–XVIII веков. Сост., перев. со старописьм. монг., транслит. и коммент. В.П. Санчирова. Элиста: КИГИ РАН, 2016. С. 59–60.
11. История Хо-Орлока. Письменные памятники по истории ойратов XVII–XVIII веков. Сост. В.П. Санчиров Элиста: КИГИ РАН, 2016. С. 24–35.
12. Златкин И.Я. История Джунгарского ханства. 1635–1758. 2-е изд. М.: Наука, 1983.
13. Китинов Б.У. «Ойраты-огеледы… пересекли реку Манкан»: этно-религиозная ситуация у ойратов в середине XV – начале XVI вв. Вестник РУДН. Серия: Всеобщая история. 2017. Т. 9. № 4. С. 370–382.
14. Мартынов А.С. Государство и религии на Дальнем Востоке. Буддизм и государство на Дальнем Востоке. Ред. Л.П. Делюсин. М.: Наука, 1987.
15. Материалы по истории русско-монгольских отношений (МИРМО). 1607–1636: Сборник документов. Сост. Л.М. Гатаулина, М.И. Голман, Д.И. Слесарчук. Под ред. И.Я. Златкина, Н.В. Устюгова. М.: ГРВЛ, 1959.
16. Миллер Г.Ф. История Сибири. Т. 1–2. М., 1937.
17. Потанин Г.Н. Очерки северо-западной Монголии. Вып. 4. Материалы этнографические. СПб.: Типография В. Киршбаума, 1883.
18. Российский государственный архив древних актов (РГАДА). Ф. 62. Оп. 1. Д. 2. 1692.
19. Российский государственный архив древних актов (РГАДА). Ф. 113. Оп. 1. 1595–1736.
20. Сумба Хамбо. История Кукунора, называемая «Прекрасные ноты из песни Брахмы». Пер. с тибет., введ. и примеч. Б.Д. Дандарона. М.: Наука, 1972.
21. Тюмень Батур У. Сказание о дербен ойратах. Лунный свет. Калмыцкие историко-литературные памятники. Элиста: Калмыцкое книжное издательство, 2003. С. 125–154.
22. Успенский В.Л. Страна Кукэ-Нор, или Цинхай, с прибавлением краткой истории ойратов и монголов, по изгнании последних из Китая, в связи с историей Кукэ-Нора. Записки Императорского Русского Географического Общества. 1880. Т. 6. C. 59–196.
23. Чжан-му, Хэ Цютао. Мэн-гу-ю-му-цзи (Записки о монгольских кочевьях). Пер. с кит. П.С. Попова. СПб.: Паровая скоропечатня П.О. Яблонскаго, 1895.
24. Atwood Ch. Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol Empire. New York: Facts on File, 2004.
25. Beckwith Ch.I. A Note on the Name and Identity of the Junghars. Mongolian Studies. 2007. Vol. 29. Pp. 41–45.
26. Brief History of the Oirat Mongols. Vol. 1. Ed. Hao Badai. Urumqi: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe, 1992 (in Chinese) [Weilate menggu jianshi. Shang ce (卫拉特蒙古简史. 上册). Hao Badai bianzhu (浩巴岱编著). Wulumuqi: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe (乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社), 1992].
27. Crossley P.K. Making Mongols. Empire at the Margins: Culture, Ethnicity, and Frontier in Early Modern China. P.K. Crossley, H.F. Siu, D.S. Sutton (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006. Рp. 58–82.
28. Das S.Ch. Rise and Progress of Buddhism in Mongolia (Hor). Tibetan Studies. Calcutta, New-Delhi, 1984. Pp. 149–161.
29. Denby Ch.Jr. The Chinese Conquest of Songaria. Peking Oriental Society, 1891. Рp. 159–181.
30. Dhondup K. The Water-Horse and Other Years. A History of 17th and 18th Century Tibet. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, 1984.
31. Elverskog J. The Jewel Translucent Sutra. Altan Khan and the Mongols in the Sixteenth Century. Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2003.
32. Grupрer S.M. Manchu Patronage and Tibetan Buddhism during the First Half of the Ch‘ing Dynasty. Journal of Tibetan Studies. 1984. No. 4. Pp. 47–74.
33. Jin H. Mongolian Chronicles of the Qing Dynasty. Hohhot: Nei Menggu renmin chubanshe, 2009 (in Chinese) [Jin Hai. Qingdai menggu zhi. (金海.清代蒙古志). Huhehaote: Neimenggu renmin chubanshe (呼和浩特:内蒙古人民出版社), 2009].
34. Khazanov A. M. The Spread of World Religions in Medieval Nomadic Societies of the Eurasian Steppes. Nomadic Diplomacy, Destruction and Religion from the Pacific to the Adriatic. M. Gervers, W. Schlepp (eds.). Toronto: Joint Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, 1994. Рp. 11–34.
35. Materials from “Qing True Records” on the History of Dzungaria. Urumqi: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe, 1987 (in Chinese) [“Qing shilu” zhunga'er shiliao zhaibian (《清实录》准噶尔史料摘编). Wulumuqi: Xinjiang renmin chubanshe (乌鲁木齐：新疆人民出版社), 1987].
36. Natsagdorj Sh., Ochir А. ‘Six Tümen’. The History of Mongolia. Vol. II. Part 3: Yuan and Late Medieval Period. D. Sneath, Ch. Kaplonski (eds.). Global Oriental, 2010. Pp. 521–526.
37. New History of Yuan. Clan Tables. Vol. 28, table 2 (in Chinese) [Xin Yuanshi. Shizu biao (新元史，氏族表). Juan 28, biao 2]. https://cnkgraph.com/Book/  KR7b0026_0028?key=兀罗带#matchedKey0 (accessed: 20.10.2022).
38. Okada H. Origins of the Dörben Oyirad. Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher. Neue Folge. Band 7. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1987. Pp. 181–211.
39. Pallas P.S. Sammlungen historischer Nachrichten über die mongolischen Vőlkerschaften. Theil 1. St. Petersburg, 1776.
40. Sanchirov V.P. Written Monuments on the History of the Oirats 17th –18th centuries. Elista: Publ. Dept. of KIGI RAS, 2016.
41. Sangs-rgyas-rgya-mtsho. Life of the Fifth Dalai lama. Vol. IV. Transl. by Zahiruddin Ahmad. New Delhi: International Academy of Indian Culture and Aditya Prakashan, 1999.
42. Saγang Sečen. Erdeni-yin Tobči (Precious Summary) [A Mongolian Chronicle of 1662]. Canberra: Australian National University, 1990 (in Mongolian).
43. Serruys H. The Office of Tayisi in Mongolia in the fifteenth Century. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 1977. Vol. 37. No. 2. Рp. 353–380.
44. Sneath D. The Headless State: Aristocratic Orders, Kinship Society, and the Misrepresentation of Nomadic Inner Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.
45. Sukhbaatar Na., Bayarsaikhan D. History of the Hoyts. Ulaanbaatar: Soyombo printing, 2016 (in Mongolian) [Сухбаатар На., Баярсайхан Д. Хойдын туух. Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг, 2016].
46. Sum-pa mkhan-po Ye-shes dpal-’byor. The Annals of Kokonor. Tranl. by Ho-Chin Yang. Indiana University Publications. Uralic and Altaic Series. Vol. 106. Bloomington: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1969.
47. Taupier R. The Oirad of the Early 17th Century: Statehood and Political Ideology. PhD diss. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 2014.
48. Terbish L. The History of Buddhism among the Oirats. Ulaanbaatar: Soyombo printing, 2008. (In Mongolian) [Тэрбиш Л. Ойрадын бурханы шашны товч туух. Улаанбаатар: Соёмбо принтинг, 2008].
49. The Historical Atlas of China. Vol. 7 (Yuan/Ming period). Tan Qixiang (ed.). Beijing: China Cartographic Publishing House, 1996 (in Chinese) [Zhongguo lishi ditu ji (中国历史地图集). Di qi ce. Yuan Ming shiqi (第七册. 元明时期). Tan Qixiang zhubian. Beijing: Zhongguo ditu chubanshe, 1996 (谭其骧主编. 北京：中国地图出版社), 1996].
50. Wang J. The Origin of “Manzhou” and “Manjushri”, Leaders and Bodhisattvas in Tibetan religio-political concept. Collected papers of the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinic. Taipei, 1997. Issue 28. Pp. 93–132 (In Chinese) [Wang J. “Manzhou” yu “Wenshu” de yuanyuan ji Xizang zhengjiao sixiang zhong de lingxiu yu fopusa (王俊中.“满洲”与“文殊”的渊源及西藏政教思想中的领袖与佛菩萨). Zhongyang yanjiuyuan jindaishi yanjiusuo jikan, di ershiba qi (中央研究院近代史研究所集刊. 台北，第二十八期). 1997. Pp. 93–132].
51. Wrapped in Excellent Silk, the Autobiography of the Fifth Dalai Lama Ngawang Lobsang Gyatso. Vol. 1, 3. Lhasa: Bod ljongs mi dmangs dpe skrun khang, 2012 (in Tibetan) [Ngag dbang blo bzang rgya mtsho mdzad. Rgyal dbang lnga pa ngag dbang blo bzang rgya mtsho’i rnam thar du ku la’i gos bzang. Vol. 1, 3. Lhasa: Bod ljongs mi dmangs dpe skrun khang, 2012].
52. Zhao E. Draft History of Qing. Shanghai: Zhonghua shuju, 1927 (in Chinese) [Zhao E. Qing shi gao. Liezhuan, fanbu 5 (赵尔巽. 清史稿. 列传三百九、藩部五). Shanghai: Zhonghua shuju (上海：中华书局)，1927. http://guoxue.httpcn.com/html/book/CQPWAZXV/KOMEPWTBKO.shtml  (accessed: 20.10.2022).
53. Zheng T. History of the Qing. Taipei: Zhishufang chuban jituan, 2003 (in Chinese) [Zheng Tianting. Qing shi (鄭天挺、清史). Taibei: Zhishufang chuban jituan (台北：知書房出版集團), 2003].

Карта_Миграция ойратов в конце 16 - начале 17 вв. вв. (Китинов_карта.pdf, 1,773 Kb) [Скачать]

Система Orphus

Загрузка...
Вверх