1. Ivanov 1965 — Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Obshcheindoevropeiskaya, praslavyanskaya i anatoliiskaya yazykovye sistemy (sravnitel’no-tipologicheskie ocherki) [Proto-Indo-European, Proto-Slavic, and Anatolian language systems (comparative-typological essays)]. Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
2. Dunn 2015 — Dunn M. Indo-European lexical cognacy database. 2015. Available at: http://ielex.mpi.nl. 
3. Emonds 2004 — Emonds J. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Adger D., de Cat C., Tsoulas G. (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004. Pp. 75—120.
4. Emonds 2012 — Emonds J. Augmented structure preservation and the Tensed S constraint. Main clause phenomena: New horizons. Aelbrecht L., Haegeman L., Nye R. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012. Pp. 23—46.
5. Friedrich 1975 — Friedrich P. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Butte (MT): Journal of Indo-European Studies, 1975.
6. Greenhill et al. 2008 — Greenhill S. J., Blust R., Gray R. D. The Austronesian basic vocabulary database: From bioinformatics to lexomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics. 2008. Vol. 4. Pp. 271—283.
7. Guardiano, Longobardi 2005 — Guardiano C., Longobardi G. Parametric comparison and language taxonomy. Grammaticalization and parametric variation. Batllori M., Hernanz M.-L., Picallo C., Roca F. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2005. Pp. 149—174.
8. Hermann 1895 — Hermann Ed. Gab es im Indogermanischen nebensätze? Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen. 1895. Bd. 33. Hf. 4. S. 481—535.
9. van den Hout 2003 — van den Hout Th. Studies in the Hittite phraseological construction I: Its syntactic and semantic properties. Hittite studies in honor of Harry A. Hoffner, Jr. on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Beckman G., Beal R., McMahon G. (eds.).Winona Lake (IN): Eisenbrauns, 2003. Pp. 177—203.
10. van den Hout 2010 — van den Hout Th. Studies in the Hittite phraseological construction II: Its origin. Hethitica XVI: Studia Anatolica in memoriam Erich Neu dicata. Lebrun R., De Vos J. (eds.). Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters, 2010. Pp. 191—204.
11. Kushniarevich, Utevska et al. 2015 — Kushniarevich A., Utevska O. et al. Genetic heritage of the Balto-Slavic speaking populations: A synthesis of autosomal, mitochondrial and Y-chromosomal data. PLOS One. 2 September 2015. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135820. 
12. Lehman 1974 — Lehman W. P. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press, 1974.
13. Longobardi, Guardiano 2009 — Longobardi G., Guardiano C. Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness. Lingua. 2009. Vol. 119. No. 11. Pp. 1679—1706.
14. Segerer 2008 — Segerer G. Le projet RefLex [Reference Lexicon]. 2008. Available at: http://reflex.cnrs.fr/database. 
15. Sideltsev 2007 — Sideltsev A. An overlooked case of inversion in Middle Hittite. Tabularia Hethaeorum: Hethitologische Beiträge Silvin Košak zum 65. Geburtstag (Dresdner Beitrage Zur Hethitologie 25). Groddek D., Zorman M. (eds.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2007. Pp. 613—629.
16. Starostin 2011—2015 — Starostin G. (ed.). The global lexicostatistical database. Moscow; Santa Fe: Russian State University for the Humanities; Santa Fe Institute, 2011—2015. Available: http://starling.rinet.ru/new100. 
17. Stolz 1989 — Stolz Th. Zum Wandel der morphotaktischen Positionsregeln des Baltischen Reflexivzeichens. Folia Linguistica Historica. 1989. Bd. 9. Nr. 1. S. 13—27.
18. Wichmann et al. 2013 — Wichmann S., Müller A., Wett A., Velupillai V., Bischoffberger J. et al. The ASJP Database. 2013. Version 16. Available at: http://asjp.clld.org/download. 
19. Yates 2014 — Yates A. On the PIE “quasi-serial verb” construction: Origin and development. Proceedings of the 25th Annual UCLA Indo-European conference. Jamison S. W., Melchert H. C., Vine B. (eds.). Bremen: Hempen, 2014. Pp. 237—255.