1. Apresjan 2004 — Apresjan J. D. (ed.). Novyi ob”yasnitel’nyi slovar’ sinonimov russkogo yazyka [A new interpretive dictionary of Russian synonyms]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoi kul’tury; Vienna: Wiener Slawistischer Almanach, 2004.
2. Bickerton 2009 — Bickerton D. Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill & Wang, 2009.
3. Bickerton 2014 — Bickerton D. More than nature needs: Language, mind, and evolution. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press, 2014.
4. Botha, Knight 2009 — Botha R. P., Knight Ch. The prehistory of language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 2009.
5. Bruening 2014 — Bruening B. Precede-and-command revisited. Language. 2014. Vol. 90. No. 2. Pp. 342—388.
6. Burlak 2011 — Burlak S. A. 2011. Proiskhozhdenie yazyka: Fakty, issledovaniya, gipotezy [The origins of language: Facts, research, hypotheses]. Moscow: Corpus, 2011.
7. Christiansen et al. 2013 — Christiansen M. H. Botha R. P., Everaert M. (eds.). Language has evolved to depend on multiple-cue integration. The evolutionary emergence of language: Evidence and inference. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2013.
8. Chomsky 1970 — Chomsky N. Remarks on nominalization. Readings in English transformational grammar. Jacobs R. A., Rosenbaum P. S. (eds.). Waltham (MA): Ginn, 1970.
9. Dor et al. 2015 — Dor D., Knight Ch., Lewis J. The social origins of language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2015.
10. Fillmore et al. 1988 — Fillmore Ch. J., Kay P., O’Connor M. C. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language. 1988. Vol. 64. No. 3. Pp. 501—538.
11. Fitch 2010 — Fitch W. T. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.
12. Fitch et al. 2005 — Fitch W. T., Hauser M. D., Chomsky N. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition. 2005. Vol. 97. Pp. 179—210.
13. Frege 1892 — Frege G. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. 1892. Bd. 100. S. 25—50.
14. Goldberg, Jackendoff 2004 — Goldberg A., Jackendoff R. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language. 2004. Vol. 80. No. 3. Pp. 532—568.
15. Hauser et al. 2002 — Hauser M. D., Chomsky N., Fitch W. T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science. 2002. Vol. 298(5598). Pр. 1569—1579.
16. Hermer-Vazquez et al. 1999 — Hermer-Vazquez L., Katsnelson A. S., Spelke E. S. Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology. 1999. Vol. 39. No. 1. Pp. 3—36.
17. Kayne 1994 — Kayne R. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1994.
18. Langacker 1969 — Langacker R. On pronominalization and the chain of command. Modern studies in English. Reibel D. A., Schane S. A. (eds.). Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1969.
19. Larson 1988 — Larson R. K. On double object constructions. Linguistic Inquiry. 1988. Vol. 19. No. 3. Pp. 335—391.
20. Paducheva 2011 — Paducheva E. V. Implitsitnoe otritsanie i mestoimeniya s otritsatel’noi polyarizatsiei [Implicit negation and negative polarity pronouns]. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 3—18.
21. Reinhart 1983 — Reinhart T. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press. 1983.
22. Tallerman, Gibson 2012 — Tallerman M., Gibson K. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.
23. Thompson 2013 — Thompson J. N. Relentless evolution. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2013.