Self-sale ad actum gerendum in Classical Roman Law

Ulpian (Ad Sab. 10: D. 28. 3. 6. 5) mentions self-sale ad actum gerendum (i.e. in order to become a manager) along with self-sale ad pretium participandum (i.e. in order to share the price) as causa servitutis which led the Roman to the loss of his citizenship. The author argues that the self-sale ad actum gerendum as well as ad pretium participandum was a special fraudulent scheme according to which a free-man who allowed himself to be sold as a slave enriched at the expense of a deceived buyer (his putative master after purchasing) – the pretended slave appropriated the money which he had made secretly taking advantage of his responsible manager po-sition – and won in a legal case concerning freedom (causa liberalis). Bringing an action against the deceiver could not provide effective protection of the buyer in that case. In order to prevent the realization of the fraudulent scheme and to punish the wrongdoer the alleged master as a defendant in the causa liberalis was given the op-portunity to raise the special defence emptionis atque actus administrati, which led to denegatio proclamationis of the alleged slave, i.e. he was barred from claiming his liberty, and thus he became a ‘slave de facto’ who was equated to a true slave.

Keywords

Roman Empire, Roman law, slavery, slave as a manager, self-sale, self-enslavement

Acknowledgment

Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-09-00386

Received

20.04.2023

Publication date

29.09.2023

Number of characters

32899

Cite

GOST	Durnovo M. Self-sale ad actum gerendum in Classical Roman Law // Vestnik drevnei istorii – 2023. – V. 83. – Issue 3 C. 593-605 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vdi/s032103910023145-2-1-en (circulation date: 28.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S032103910023142-9
MLA	Durnovo, Maxim "Self-sale ad actum gerendum in Classical Roman Law." Vestnik drevnei istorii 83.3 (2023):593-605. DOI: 10.31857/S032103910023142-9
APA	Durnovo M. (2023). Self-sale ad actum gerendum in Classical Roman Law. Vestnik drevnei istorii 83(3), pp.593-605 DOI: 10.31857/S032103910023142-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 161

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aubert, J.-J. 1994: Business managers in ancient Rome: A social and economic study of institores, 200 BC – AD 250. Leiden–New York–Köln.

2. Buckland, W.W. 1908: The Roman law of slavery: The condition of the slave in private law from Augustus to Justinian. Cambridge.

3. Carlsen, J. 1995: Vilici and Roman estate managers until AD 284. Rome.

4. Coli, U. 1922: Saggi critici sulle fonti del diritto romano. I. Capitis deminutio. Firenze.

5. Crook, J. 1967: Law and life of Rome. Ithaca (New York).

6. Duncan-Jones, R. 2016: Power and privilege in Roman society. Cambridge.

7. Glancy, J. 2002: Slavery in early Christianity. Oxford.

8. Harris, W.V. 2011: Rome’s imperial economy: Twelve essays. Oxford–New York.

9. Herrmann-Otto, E. 1999: Causae liberales. Index 27, 141–159.

10. Herrmann-Otto, E. 2002: Modes d’acquisition des esclaves dans l’Empire romain. Aspects juridiques et socio-économiques. In: M. Garrido-Hory (ed.), Routes et marchés d’esclaves: 26e colloque du GIREA, Besançon, 27–29 septembre 2001. Besançon, 113–126.

11. Indra, M. 2011: Status quaestio: Studien zum Freiheitsprozess im klassischen römischen Recht. Berlin.

12. Kaiser, W. 2001: Zur Herkunft des Codex Florentinus: Zugleich zur Florentiner Digestenhandschrift als Erkentnisquelle für die Redaktion der Digesten. In: A. Schmidt-Recla, E. Schumann, F. Theisen (Hrsg.), Sachsen im Spiegel des Rechts: ius commune propriumque. Köln–Weimar–Wien, 39–57.

13. Kaser, M. 1996: Das römische Zivilprozessrecht. 2. Aufl. München.

14. Lenski, N. 2011: Constantine and slavery: libertas and the fusion of Roman and Christian values. Atti dell’Accademia romanistica Costantiniana 18, 235–260.

15. Mommsen, Th. (recogn.) 1870: Digesta Iustiniani Augusti. Vol. 1. Berolini.

16. Morabito, M. 1981: Les réalités de l’esclavage d’après le Digeste. Paris.

17. Nicolau, M. 1933: Causa liberalis: Étude historique et comparative du procès de liberté dans les législations anciennes. Paris.

18. Peppe, L. 2010: Fra corpo e patrimonio: Obligatus, addictus, ductus, persona in causa mancipi. In: A. Corbino, M. Humbert, G. Negri (a cura di), Homo, caput, persona: La costruzione giuridica dell’identità nell’esperienza romana. Pavia, 435–490.

19. Ramin, J., Veyne, P. 1981: Droit romain et société: les hommes libres qui passent pour esclaves et l’esclavage volontaire. Historia 30/4, 472–497.

20. Reduzzi Merola, F. 2021: De quoi parle-t-on quand on parle d’esclavage volontaire à Rome? Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 47/1, 159–177.

21. Reggi, R. 1958: Liber homo bona fide serviens. Milano.

22. Silver, M. 2011: Contractual slavery in the Roman economy. Ancient History Bulletin 25, 73–132.

23. Silver, M. 2016: At the base of Rome’s peculium economy. Fundamina 22/1, 67–93.

24. Söllner, A. (Bearb.) 2000: Corpus der römischen Rechtsquellen zur antiken Sklaverei. IX. Irrtümlich als Sklaven gehaltene freie Menschen und Sklaven in unsicheren Eigentumsverhältnisse: Homines liberi et servi alieni bona fide servientes. Stuttgart.

25. Thébert, Y. 1993: The slave. In: A. Giardina (ed.), L. Cochrane (transl.), The Romans. Chicago, 138–174.

26. Wieling, H. (Bearb.) 1999: Corpus der römischen Rechtsquellen zur antiken Sklaverei. I. Die Begründung des Sklavenstatus nach ius gentium und ius civile. Stuttgart.